Powerful lobbyists prepare to attack nursing home reform bill
Politico's Samuel Loewenberg wrote an article about how high priced lobbyists are attempting to get rid of necessary reforms for nursing home care to improve.
The profitable nursing home industry is mobilizing Washington’s most well-connected lobbyists to fight needed reforms, Recently state and federal investigators and outside experts have agreed to certain reforms as a gaggle of industry lobbyists plotted strategy.
Among the lobbysts was The Carlyle Group, the politically connected and powerful private equity firm that recently bought Manor Care, one of the nation’s largest nursing home chain, for $6.3 billion.
“In spite of existing oversight mechanisms, we continue to see examples of horrific treatment of nursing home residents,” testified Lewis Morris, general counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General.
The lobbyists are carefully watching the Senate, where legislation could increase the oversight and enforcement of the industry. It is well documented how deficient the oversight and enforcement of the industry is as evidenced by the recent GAO Report. The senators are expected to try to attach the legislation to the upcoming Medicare payments package.
The industry lobbyists are fighting provisions to fully disclose ownership of nursing homes. Why? No one knows. Clearly, families of residents should be able to understand who owns and operates the facility where they place loved ones.
Additionally, penalties would be increased to as much as $100,000 if a patient is harmed or dies due to poor care. The penalties, which have not been changed in two decades, are now capped at $10,000.
To gird for the increased regulation, the industry is using a half-dozen of Washington’s most politically potent lobbying firms on both sides of the aisle. “It is going to be pretty much battening down the hatches, because we’re not going to have a fair shake with a Democratic majority,” said a nursing home industry lobbyist who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Since Carlyle took over Manor Care, some homes have reported significant patient care problems, said SEIU spokeswoman Julie Eisenhardt. Meanwhile lobbyists for The Carlyle Group are stating that there is no evidence that private equity ownership negatively impacts care. Both the Government Accountability Office and the Senate Finance Committee are still investigating the negative effect of private equity ownership on nursing home quality.
The issue is at the heart of one of the most controversial parts of the Grassley-Kohl legislation: a requirement that the sometimes-twisted ownership structures of nursing homes be made more transparent. Congressional staff, experts, and advocates for the elderly say that private equity firms often establish layers in ownership structure as a way to dodge responsibility and legal liability.
And GAO reported how federal government regulators often miss signs of abuse and care deficiencies, ranging from failure to ensure “proper nutrition and hydration and [prevent] pressure sores” to serious deficiencies that could lead to “actual harm and immediate jeopardy.”
Great information. Fines should be increased if there is inadequate care. This is something that is seen too often.
A point to remember:
A mistake is not necessarily negligence. If the care is substandard on a regular basis, yes it is negligence. But humans do make mistakes, and most nursing homes try very hard to provide the best care for their residents. Families themselves sometimes make this very difficult to do. I think we need to look at both sides of the coin.
Carol:
I agree that there are two sides to any story and sometimes three but it drives me crazy when nursing homes states that they don't have enough money to properly care for residents and then spend millions on lobbyists. Then these lobbyists talk about "frivolous" cases without ever giving an example, and stating that the compensation given to families of neglected residents affect the care provided to present residents. This is untrue. Insurance pays for any settlement or jury award and it does not come out of the money used to care for residents.
It is shocking how the big chains (i.e. Beverly, Manor Care, Extendicare, Mariner, SavaSeniorCare, and Trans Healthcare, Inc.) have decided to have no insurance for the facility and then created a maze of corporate entities to hide assets and forego accountability. It is not fair to the neglected residents. Mistakes do happen and can be explained but the industry has made it a point not to be held accountable for cost cutting procedures that hurt the care provided to the residents. There are two victims when that happens: the residents and the nurses who provide care without adequate staff and resources.
Good point, Ray. And I agree that many of the industry's problems begin with cost cuts of the big chains (and even not so big chains). I just want to point out that there are some nursing homes (non-profits, mostly) that do spend the money to educate their staff and provide care above the standard to their residents. When the name of the game is profit, priorities usually change.
Nursing Home Legislation and Mandatory Staffing Levels
(Best Syndication News) On Friday, September 26, 2008, Reps. Pete Stark and Jan Schakowsky introduced the "Nursing Home Transparency and Quality of Care Improvement Act of 2008."
The bill increases the transparency of nursing home ownership, ensures that residents and their families have information about the quality of care at these facilities, and strengthens enforcement of nursing home compliance with quality of care standards. It is a companion bill to S. 2641, introduced by Senators Charles Grassley and Herb Kohl.
The Nursing Home Act enables nursing home residents and government regulators to better know who actually owns the nursing home and who controls the decision-making that impacts the quality of care provided. In addition, the bill improves the reporting of information on staffing levels and direct patient care expenditures.
http://www.bestsyndication.com:80/?q=20081017_nursing_homes_legislation.htm