Minimal fines are no deterrent

The Las Vegas Sun had an article about a nursing home that was cited and fined $5,100 by the state for repeated health and safety violations and ordered not to accept new residents.  These violations are incredible.  The bureau said an “immediate jeopardy situation” was declared due to missing resident medications, failure to have criminal background checks, an ongoing cockroach infestation, a lack of a functioning auditory alarm system, poor care on a resident with a colostomy, tuberculosis testing and medication administration.

Eight of the deficiencies were repeats from previous inspections. The state Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance said there have been repeated violations dating back to February of 2007 at Best Care Facility which was fined $600 last year.  Surveys in 2007, 2008, 2009 and in February this year showed multiple violations. The bureau said the home was inspected Feb. 2 this year and received the grade of D when 30 violations were found.

“It has been determined that residents are not safe at this facility due to chronic, repeated non-compliance and that the facility is engaging in practices detrimental to the health and safety of the residents,” the bureau said.

A person named “Danny” at the nursing home answered the telephone. He said he would return a call later but he declined to give his last name.

 

 

 

Weak Penalty for Mental Cruelty

Arizona Daily Star reported that Posada Del Sol nursing home has agreed to pay a fine of $4,000 to the Arizona Department of Health Services for failing to protect six of its residents from abuse.

The 156-bed facility represents that they are experts who specialize in caring for people with complex behavioral-health issues.  State inspectors said the nursing home failed to protect six residents from "mental and/or verbal abuse" regarding food preferences, and from an abusive environment toward bariatric/obese patients.

In one case, a physician had authorized a patient to eat meals in bed due to pain from bladder spasms, the staff ignored the orders and, except for one can of supplement, refused to give the resident any food.   A nurse even taunted the resident with a food tray in an attempt to coerce the resident to the dining room.

In another case, a resident with excruciating back pain asked to eat meals in bed but was denied and given a can of supplement instead, the report says.

Posada Del Sol recently made "leadership changes" and retrained its patient-care and food-service workers.

The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid's nursing-home rating system gives Posada Del Sol a rating of one star - its lowest designation, meaning "much below average."
 

Seniors for Sale

The Seattle Times had a great article called "Seniors for Sale".  The article discusses the unfortunate plight of Nadra McSherry.   She needed an adult family home and settled on Narrows View Manor in Tacoma, owned by Arlie and Charlene Leno.   They relied on the fact that adult homes were licensed by the state Department of Social and Health Services. 

McSherry paid $3,500 a month for a bedroom, prepared meals and daily care delivered by a staff of aides.  McSherry's daughters had no clue that only weeks earlier, inspectors for DSHS had swept into the home and uncovered 14 safety and health violations. And they had no idea that Arlie Leno harbored a troubling past, one enabled by state regulators.

In 1990, Arlie Leno left his job as a nursing-home administrator and became his own boss, getting a state license to run a Tacoma boarding home with 16 adult residents. He called it Tule Lake Manor. Leno's residents ranged from the bed bound to those with late-stage Alzheimer's disease or Down syndrome. Despite his work experience, Leno got into trouble within a few months of opening Tule Lake Manor.

Inspectors for DSHS cited him for 18 violations including failing to properly train staff, notify family when a resident fell and broke a hip, and obtain medical care for a resident who fell and was injured.  Inspectors found that one staffer had lost her nurse's-aide license for "alcohol and drug issues"; another was on probation for a felony assault conviction and, by law, was not allowed to be alone with a vulnerable adult.

In 2000, DSHS revoked Leno's boarding-home license, citing a decade of abuse and neglect and evidence that residents had "suffered actual harm." Between 1990 and 2000, state inspectors had cited Leno with 135 violations.  He sold Tule Lake Manor for $422,000.

After Arlie Leno gave up his boarding home in 2000, he began taking a more active role at Narrows View.  After that, inspectors cited the home more often for violations including failing to train staff and to screen them for infectious diseases.

In 2002, they declared bankruptcy. They said they netted about $30,000 a year from their business but had $316,000 in mortgage and other debts, including $40,000 in delinquent federal taxes.

More violations piled up at Narrows View Manor: They failed to create a "care plan" for each resident. The care plan is a critical blueprint that tells staff exactly what care each resident requires: what medications to take and when, how often a resident has to be turned to avoid bedsores, what diet to follow, and so on.

Arlie Leno also hired a woman convicted of felony assault to care for the residents. By law, her conviction barred her from working there.

In July 2003, the couple separated and Charlene Leno, then 60, moved out. Their breakup created problems for Arlie Leno as well as for his residents. His wife was listed on the state license as the "provider," meaning she was the owner responsible for overseeing care.

Arlie Leno's solution was to lie repeatedly to inspectors about his wife's whereabouts. For nearly a year, state records show, he told DSHS investigators that his wife was away on vacation or visiting family.  DSHS officials finally discovered the deception.   Leno had lied at least four times so DSHS fined them a measly $400.

That same year, 2004, Arlie Leno sneaked an extra resident into Narrows View. By law, he was limited to six residents, but he added a seventh, apparently to squeeze out more profits.

During a DSHS inspection in July 2004, Leno told a staffer that he had only six residents, five female and one male. The inspector became suspicious when he spotted a second male resident walk out of the staff bedroom, and asked his identity.

In another case, a resident fell on the bathroom floor and broke her leg but the caregiver refused to call an ambulance. "We don't do that here," DSHS records recount the caregiver as saying. "We call the family to take them."   The injured woman's family wasn't called until nearly three hours after she fell, records show. 

Again, DSHS settled for modest fines.

All through this time, McSherry's daughters and other family members visited her nearly every day at Narrows View; daughter Janice McDonald, who worked at a hospital nearby, would stop in after work.  "One might wonder why we didn't see what was going on," Elaine Matsuda would later explain. "There are some things that are so subtle. And what Arlie Leno didn't want us to see is not going to happen while we're there."   The McSherry family knew nothing of Leno's serious violations.

In June 2006, McSherry developed a small bedsore on her tailbone. The daughters arranged for a registered nurse to visit the Leno home and treat her wound.   Once the wound had sufficiently healed, the nurse showed aides at Narrows View how to treat pressure sores. She told the staff to alert her or McSherry's doctor if the sore flared again.

Within two months, McSherry's pressure sore re-emerged, medical records show. But no one at the home recognized its danger and no one in McSherry's family was told about it, nor were her doctor or nurse. The wound remained untreated for more than a month. Aides did rub an ointment on it each day. But the ointment was not suitable for pressure sores. In fact, records show, the ointment made it worse.

After sitting for a month with a painful festering bedsore, she finally said, "My bottom hurts," McDonald recalled.  She undressed her mother, then gasped. "There was a quarter-size hole in the skin. It went to the bone," she said.

A nurse visiting Leno's home at the time examined McSherry's tailbone and was alarmed. It was the worst pressure sore she had seen in 20 years of practice, she later told DSHS investigators. It was a Stage IV ulcer, meaning it had eaten through her skin, muscles and connective tissue, down to the bone.

McSherry was rushed to the emergency room, then admitted to Allenmore Hospital. For nearly a month, doctors unleashed a medical arsenal against the raging infection and the pain. Nothing worked.  She died.

Dr. Richard Waltman, who signed her death certificate, said McSherry died of a heart attack brought on by infection from the bedsore. "It was too much for her body to handle," he said.

"My mother died a horrifically painful death. She weighed 80 pounds when she died. They were giving her morphine that would have knocked out a 400-pound football player," Matsuda said. "She still would scream and yell and cry out in pain and delirium from the medication."

DSHS determined that Leno's mistreatment of McSherry did not warrant revoking his license. It required him, for the first time, to post his violations publicly. And it did fine him $3,200: $100 for each of the 32 days that he failed to provide proper care to McSherry the price of one preventable death.

This infuriated Matsuda and her sisters. Since McSherry's death, DSHS found more serious violations at Leno's home. In May 2007, a female resident was found crawling in the middle of a four-lane street in a busy intersection. The woman, who had Alzheimer's disease, ended up in a nearby emergency room with a head wound.

Finally in May 2007, Janice Schurman, a DSHS supervisor, wrote to her superiors that field investigators felt Leno should lose his license.  Supervisors overruled her.   DSHS supervisors ultimately ruled in favor of Leno, who will be 83 years old this year.   He holds a dubious record: No adult-home owner has amassed as many serious violations as Leno has and still remained open for business.

McSherry's daughters were haunted by their mother's neglect.   Matsuda contacted Seattle attorney Anthony Shapiro, who determined that Arlie Leno had no major assets and did not carry liability insurance.  Shapiro embraced a novel strategy: He filed a civil suit against DSHS under the legal doctrine of "deliberate indifference." He had to prove that DSHS knew that a substantial risk to residents existed at Leno's adult family home and chose to ignore it.

"This was not the only incident in Narrows View's history where pressure ulcers and pressure sores cropped up among patients," Shapiro said. "They had a long history of people having pressure sores and DSHS knew about it and other than noting it, and coming in periodically, the practice at this home really never changed.

DSHS settled with McSherry's family late last year for $565,000. Leno, also named in the suit, reached a confidential settlement with the family.

A Times reporter telephoned a DSHS regional office and, as any member of the public can do, asked about the enforcement history at Arlie Leno's home.   A DSHS staffer mischaracterized the bulk of Leno's history of violations as minor infractions and "paperwork problems."

When she came to the 2006 violations regarding McSherry, the staffer noted that a resident had developed a "little pressure ulcer."  When asked if the woman died from neglect, the DSHS staffer consulted the enforcement computer once again.

Oh, no, she said. "It doesn't show anything about a death
 

Illinois Task Force Proposals

The Chicago Tribune had an article about the weak and disappointing proposals to improve safety and the quality of care in nursing homes.  A panel appointed by Gov. Pat Quinn proposed  an array of sweeping reforms designed to end the chronic violence and abuse that plague some nursing homes, while fostering better treatment for people with serious mental illness living in those facilities. The proposals range from tightened criminal background checks of new nursing home residents to stronger sanctions and enforcement of facilities with chronic safety breaches.

Quinn's Nursing Home Safety Task Force also recommended that state police begin searching nursing homes for residents with outstanding warrants, and urged the state to increase minimum staffing requirements of the facilities to bring them up to standards spelled out in federal government studies on nursing home care.  "Urge"?  Why don't they propose specific hours per patient day?

 

Continue Reading...

Millions in Medicaid Fraud?

Palm Beach Post ran an interesting article about possible Medicaid Fraud.  As taxpayers, we should all be outraged when nursing homes take money for patient care and use it for other reasons such as perks, bonuses, and profit.  Medicaid auditors have disallowed more than a half-million dollars in "operating costs" at a Pahokee nursing home.  The audit only looked at a limited period, 2003-2004, and concluded nearly $672,000 in operating expenses did not merit reimbursement by the government.  Hopefully, they will audit additional years to find the millions taken in Mediciad funds.  Government money provides most of the revenue at the 120-bed nursing home, where the annual operating budget runs between $5 million and $10 million.

Among the red flags: Billing the government for automobile expenses "not supported as business-related" at Glades Health Care Center.  The Post examined spending on hot tubs, Cadillacs, BMWs and other luxury cars, along with hefty pay for executives and their family members at Glades Health Care Center and related organizations over several years.

A spokeswoman for the state's Agency for Health Care Administration said she was not aware of other audits currently under way against the chain of nursing homes, though she could not rule out further inquiries.  Why aren't they doing audits for other years?

 

Lobbyist gets fine for neglect lowered

The Des Moines Register ran an article about the settlement of a fine paid by Friendship Manor after it neglected a resident so badly that a leg had to be removed due to gangrene.  The nursing home agreed to pay more than $75,000 to settle allegations of resident neglect.  Officials fined the nursing home $101,250 last fall, after the resident died. It was one of the largest fines ever imposed against an Iowa nursing home.  The case involved Ruth Louden who entered Friendship Manor in 2008 for what was expected to be a short stay. The facility was to provide physical therapy for her after she fractured an ankle in a fall at her home.  Louden's doctors gave Friendship Manor written orders to monitor the circulation in her leg and to check her skin every shift for any signs of swelling or redness.

During the next four weeks, staff ignored Louden's complaints of horrible and excruciating pain. During that time, Friendship Manor staff gave Louden pain medication but never pulled back a stocking to examine her leg.  Workers at Friendship Manor said that during Louden's 25-day stay, they never removed her stocking to look at her leg.  Eventually, a physical therapy aide at Friendship Manor noticed Louden's leg smelled like rotting meat. She also noticed blood seeping through the stocking.

Louden was taken to a Grinnell hospital, where an emergency room physician noted that a wound dressing applied at the hospital a month earlier was untouched, indicating that the staff neglected to change the dressing.  Louden suffered gangrene and the leg was amputated below the knee. She never recovered, and she died three months later.

Federal officials fined Friendship Manor $4,050 for each of the 25 days Louden was there. They also imposed a $150 per-day fine for the 76 days the home needed to correct other problems.

Owner Tim Boyle refused to admit any fault or pay the fine so he appealed the penalty. Finally last month, he agreed to settle the case by paying $75,397 to the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Boyle is also the president of the Iowa nursing home industry's main lobbying organization.  Boyle, who has hosted campaign fundraisers for Iowa lawmakers in his South Dakota home, then began lobbying his congresswoman for a less punitive system of regulating nursing homes. The Iowa Healthcare Association, with Boyle as its president, began telling Iowa lawmakers of "rogue" inspectors who were too aggressive in their enforcement of health and safety regulations. In one written presentation for legislators, the association said the fine against Friendship Manor threatened the existence of the facility and its $700,000 payroll. The presentation made no mention of Louden's death or the gangrene that triggered the fine. 

It is unclear how his role as a lobbyist and his relationship with government officials might have helped in the negotiations to lower the fine.

 

Continue Reading...

New GAO Report on Underreporting of Violations

The Government Accountability Office issued a new report titled Addressing the Factors Underlying Understatement of Serious Care Problems Requires Sustained CMS and State Commitment.  Not surprisingly South Carolina is one of the worst offendersReducing understatement is critical to protecting the health and safety of vulnerable nursing home residents and ensuring the credibility of the survey process. Federal and state efforts will require a sustained, long-term commitment because understatement arises from weaknesses in several interrelated areas—including CMS’s survey process, surveyor workforce and training, supervisory review processes, and state agency practices and external pressure.

The conclusions reached include as follows:
Concerns about CMS’s Survey Process.
Survey methodology and guidance are integral to reliable and consistent state nursing home surveys, and we found that weaknesses in these areas were linked to understatement by both surveyors and state agency directors. Both groups reported struggling to interpret existing guidance, and differences in interpretation were linked to understatement, especially in determining what constitutes actual harm. Surveyors noted that the current survey guidance was too lengthy, complex, and subjective. Additionally, they had fewer concerns about care areas for which CMS has issued revised interpretive protocols.

Ongoing Workforce and Surveyor Training Challenges. Workforce shortages in state survey agencies increase the need for high-quality initial and ongoing training for surveyors. Currently, high vacancy rates can place pressure on state surveyors to complete surveys under difficult circumstances, including compressed time frames, inadequately staffed survey teams, and too many inexperienced surveyors. States are responsible for hiring and retaining surveyors and have grappled with pervasive and intractable workforce shortages. State agency directors struggling with these workforce issues reported the need for more readily accessible training for both their new and experienced surveyors that did not involve travel to a central location. Nearly 30 percent of surveyors in high-understatement states stated that initial surveyor training, which is primarily a state activity that incorporates two CMS on-line computer courses and a 1-week federal basic training course culminating in the SMQT, was not adequate to identify deficiencies and cite them at the appropriate scope and severity level. State agency directors reported that workforce shortages also impede states’ ability to provide ongoing training opportunities for experienced staff and that additional CMS online training and electronic training media would help states maintain an experienced, well-informed workforce.

Supervisory Review Limitations.
Currently, CMS provides little guidance on how states should structure supervisory review processes, leaving the scope of this important quality-assurance tool exclusively to the states and resulting in considerable variation throughout the nation in how these processes are structured. We believe that state quality assurance processes are a more effective preventive measure against understatement because they have the potential to be more immediate and cover more surveys than the limited number of federal comparative surveys conducted in each state. However, compared to reviews of serious deficiencies, states conducted relatively fewer reviews of deficiencies at the D through F level, those that were most frequently understated throughout the nation, to assess whether or not such deficiencies were cited at too low a scope and severity level.  In addition, we found that frequent changes to survey results made during supervisory review were symptomatic of workforce shortages and survey methodology weaknesses.

State Agency Practices and External Pressure In a few states, noncitation practices, challenging relationships with the industry or legislators, or unbalanced IDR processes—those that surveyors regard as favoring nursing home operators over resident welfare—may have had a negative effect on survey quality and resulted in the citation of fewer nursing home deficiencies than was warranted.  In one state, both the state agency director and over 40 percent of surveyors acknowledged the existence of a noncitation practice such as allowing a home to correct a deficiency without receiving a citation.  Forty percent of surveyors in four other states also responded on our questionnaire that noncitation practices existed.   Twelve state agency directors reported on our questionnaire experiencing some kind of external pressure. For example, in one state a legislator attended a survey and questioned surveyors as to whether state agency executives were coercing them to find deficiencies. Under such circumstances, it is difficult to know if the affected surveyors are consistently enforcing federal standards and reporting all deficiencies at the appropriate scope and severity levels. States’ differing experiences regarding the enforcement of federal standards and collaboration with their CMS regional offices in the face of significant external pressure also may confuse or undermine a thorough and independent survey process. If surveyors believe that CMS does not fully or consistently support the enforcement of federal standards, these surveyors may choose to avoid citing deficiencies that they perceive may trigger a reaction from external stakeholders. In addition, deficiency determinations may be influenced when IDR processes are perceived to favor nursing home operators over resident welfare.

Recommended Action includes:

Make sure that action is taken to address concerns identified with the new QIS methodology, such as ensuring that it accurately identifies potential quality problems; and clarify and revise existing CMS written guidance to make it more concise, simplify its application in the field, and reduce confusion, particularly on the definition of actual harm.

To address surveyor workforce shortages and insufficient training, we recommend that the Administrator of CMS take the following two actions: (1)  consider establishing a pool of additional national surveyors that could augment state survey teams or identify other approaches to help states experiencing workforce shortages; and (2) evaluate the current training programs and division of responsibility between federal and state components to determine the most cost-effective approach to: (1) providing initial surveyor training to new surveyors, and (2) supporting the continuing education of experienced surveyors.

To address inconsistencies in state supervisory reviews, we recommend that the Administrator of CMS take the following action:
Set an expectation through guidance that states have a supervisory review program as a part of their quality-assurance processes that includes routine reviews of deficiencies at the level of potential for more than minimal harm (D-F) and that provides feedback to surveyors regarding changes made to citations.

To address state agency practices and external pressure that may compromise survey accuracy, we recommend that the Administrator of CMS take the following two actions: (1)  reestablish expectations through guidance to state survey agencies that noncitation practices—official or unofficial—are inappropriate, and systematically monitor trends in states’ citations; and (2) establish expectations through guidance to state survey agencies to communicate and collaborate with their CMS regional offices when they experience significant pressure from legislators or the nursing home industry that may affect the survey process or surveyors’ perceptions

Lack of disciplinary action against Administrators

Chicago Sun-Times had a great article about how administrators in Illnois (like most states) do not get disciplined when  the administrators allow or permit abuse, neglect, or poor care at nursing homes.  Illinois nursing home administrators are rarely disciplined even though the state Health Department, which investigates nursing home care, refers dozens of cases a year to the agency in charge of meting out punishment.

From 2005 through 2009, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation received 407 complaints from the state's health department. Only three resulted in discipline for nursing home administrators.  THREE OUT OF 407 COMPLAINTS. 

Advocates for nursing home residents say that's a sign of a broken system.  "Less than 1 percent is ridiculous," said Toby Edelman, an attorney with the nonprofit Center for Medicare Advocacy. "There should be more accountability on the part of the administrators."

The numbers were put together by a task force Gov. Pat Quinn formed after a series of assaults, rapes and murders in Illinois nursing homes. The task force is looking into why so few cases result discipline, said Michael Gelder, Quinn's senior health adviser. "We're absolutely very concerned about that," he said.

Advocates for nursing home residents are now watching to see whether Jamie L. Lloyd, administrator of Maplewood Care in Elgin, will be disciplined after a 21-year-old mentally ill resident sexually assaulted a 69-year-old woman at the home. Lloyd did not do a proper background check.  Had Lloyd checked, he would have discovered the former resident had an outstanding arrest warrant on felony battery charges.

 

 

 

Fines reduced for abuse and neglect

Florida's State Journal Register ran an article about Golden Moments Senior Care Center in Jacksonville that was fined only $20,000 after one of its nurse's aides terrorized several elderly and sick residents.  The nursing home agreed to pay a reduced fine.  Golden Moments and the Illinois Department of Public Health worked out a deal in which the 113-bed facility will pay a $6,500 fine connected with the nurse's aide's conduct, said department spokeswoman Melaney Arnold.

The complaint said Golden Moments nurse's aide Jessie L. Ross "displayed a pattern of abusive behavior toward residents". That behavior included telling a resident to "go to hell," slapping the resident and depriving the resident of soda and snacks. Ross slapped a different resident, threatened to slit his throat, kicked the resident and held the resident's hands against his chest. Ross also allegedly hid another resident's nail polish and slapped that resident across the face. 

A state inspection report indicated residents had been complaining to staff members about the aide's conduct for weeks, and that several staff members observed, knew about or suspected physical and mental abuse was going on but failed to report the situation to their superiors.  Ross, who told Public Health officials she was training to become a nurse, is fighting the discipline, which hasn't been finalized.

"I find the decision to reduce the fine against Golden Moments for the abuse of residents to be incomprehensible," said Jamie Freschi, regional long-term care ombudsman who works for Springfield's "I CARE" social service agency. "The system has a responsibility to look out for the safety of the residents, not the interests of the facilities."

Officials from the state and federal governments are considering new fines against Golden Moments Senior Care Center after the Oct. 3 death of a 74-year-old resident who choked on food.   A Springfield-based advocate for nursing home residents said she was appalled by the fine reduction and noted that central Illinois nursing homes charge $4,000 to $5,000 a month for the care of one resident.

Golden Moments resident Adam Waelz was pronounced dead Oct. 3 after choking on food provided by the nursing home, Morgan County Coroner Jeff Lair said.   According to a state inspection report, Waelz, who was developmentally disabled, was known to be at risk of choking and often ate or drank too fast and should have been closely supervised while in the dining room.

The day of his death, Waelz, who had no teeth, should have received ham that was ground up, but he instead received ham that had been torn into pieces, according to the report. Lair's death investigation found ham pieces and mashed potatoes from Waelz's mouth lying next to his body. An autopsy revealed a wad of ham pieces the "size of a tangerine" in his windpipe, according to the state report.

Other problems described in the report included failure to keep residents clean, failure to prevent new bed sores from developing on several residents, and failure to provide activities for residents housed in an Alzheimer's unit.

 

Health Care Reform Bill includes new rules for nursing homes

NCCNHR (formerly the National Citizens' Coalition for Nursing Home Reform) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit membership organization founded in 1975 by Elma L. Holder to protect the rights, safety and dignity of America's long-term care consumers.   NCCNHR issued the following Bulletin:

The health care reform bill passed by the House of Representativesbefore includes not only sweeping health insurance reforms but also nursing home transparency, criminal background checks on long-term care workers, and a voluntary payroll deduction system that would provide benefits for long-term care services. The bill, H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, can be downloaded at http://thomas.loc.gov.

 

As expected, the bill includes-without amendment-nursing home transparency provisions requiring:

1)  Public disclosure of individuals and entities that own, govern, operate, finance, provide services to, and/or control the nation's nursing homes.

2)  Compliance and ethics programs and internal quality assurance programs in nursing homes, and pilot projects to test ways to improve oversight of chains.

3)  Collection and reporting of staffing information based on payroll data, including hours of care per resident day, turnover and retention rates, and facility expenditures for wages and benefits.

4)  A review of Nursing Home Compare and addition of information about sanctions against facilities and the number of adjudicated crimes occurring in them.

5)  A categorical breakdown of expenditures on cost reports to show how much facilities spend on direct care versus other expenses.

6)  An improved state complaint process to help protect complainants against retaliation.

7)  An increase in federal civil monetary penalties and a process to hold CMPs in escrow during appeals (although only after an independent informal dispute resolution process was completed).
8)  Adequate notification when facilities decided to close, including the option for the government to continue reimbursement until relocation was achieved.

9)  Training of nursing assistants in dementia care and abuse prevention.

10)  The bill would authorize a program of national criminal background checks on all long-term care workers who have access to residents or patients--from those who provide in-home long-term care services to nursing home employees.

H.R. 3962 also incorporates the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act to create a national voluntary social insurance system through which enrollees who became disabled (after paying into the system for at least five years) could purchase community-based long-term care, services or supports. Nursing home residents who were Medicaid beneficiaries could retain 5 percent of their benefit, in addition to their personal needs allowance, for their personal use while the remainder was applied to the cost of their care. (See page 1562 of the bill.)

 

Last-minute efforts to add the Elder Justice Act to H.R. 3962 were not successful. The EJA is in the health care reform bill passed by the Senate Finance Committee.

 

 

 

Poliakoff & Associates, P.A., is one of South Carolina’s most respected and distinguished law firms. The Poliakoff firm began nearlyMore...