Medicare and Hospice

Health Leaders Media and the blog Free Market Mojo wrote interesting articles about how Medicare policies increase hospice stays.  The Medicare hospice benefit is designed to provide visits by an interdisciplinary care team to better manage pain and other end of life issues and to provide psychosocial and spiritual support in the nursing home setting for residents and their families.

However, the length of an average Medicare-certified hospice stay in a nursing home has doubled during the last decade, researchers at Brown University have found.  Published in the August Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, their study finds that standard treatment time in nursing homes between 1999 and 2006 has increased from 46 to 93 days.   The study proves that nursing homes make more money by placing a resident on hospice because the standard daily payment rate for most Medicare hospice enrollment acts as an incentive for extended stays.

The study also found that the doubling of Medicare services in nursing homes is related to a 50% growth rate in the number of hospices—primarily for profit hospices.  Stays were longest in states with the greatest provider growth.  At the current time, a third of Medicare beneficiaries who die in nursing homes are accessing hospice services, and the study predicts that this number is expected to increase.

In addition to changing the rates of payment to reflect the proper timing of the more intense care needs, the researchers agree with a Medicare Payment Advisory Commission's recommendation that procedures for determining hospice eligibility recertification should be strengthened.

These changes would help the Medicare system avoid the possible scrutiny of nursing home residents who live beyond the physician certified six month prognosis—a Medicare requirement for hospice eligibility—and would permit patients to access the hospice care when they actually need it. 

Affordable Care Act

Barbara Quirk wrote an article on The Cap Times regarding certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act.  The federal Department of Health and Human Services announced the availability of $60 million in Affordable Care Act grants to help people navigate their health and long-term care options. Through these grants, HHS’s Administration on Aging will collaborate with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to encourage an integrated approach to health care and social services. It is a model that has long been recognized as essential for patients and their caregivers.

The Affordable Care Act seeks to lower health care costs, improve the quality of health care and, perhaps most importantly, give people more control over their own care. These new grants, authorized under the new law, will help seniors, individuals with disabilities and their families get better quality care and more control. We’ve also streamlined the process for states and people who rely on these funds,” said HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

“We know how difficult it can be for caregivers and patients to try and deal with a sudden illness or chronic disease while at the same time trying to negotiate through a complex health care system to figure where you can get help. These new funds that we have bundled together will help promote better opportunities for coordination of health and long-term supports,” said Sebelius.

“When it comes to long-term health care, each patient has a unique mix of complex medical and social needs that must be considered when seeking care,” says Marilyn Tavenner, acting CMS administrator. “Our health care system can offer many options to meeting those needs from traditional nursing home care to home and community-based services. Making patients and their families aware of these options will help them make inherently difficult decisions about long-term care. The integrated program will help families make informed choices and make sure patients have more control over their own care.”

This is part of a larger nationwide effort to bring direct-care workers into positions of respect and acknowledgment by giving the patients or the families a bigger voice in decisions about working conditions and wages. Whether in a traditional nursing home setting or an in-home setting, a critical factor is continuity of care.

Basic to any effort to improve long-term care is retaining, supporting and strengthening this core group of personal care providers.

Affordable Care Act funds will be available to states, area agencies on aging and Aging and Disability Resource Centers to coordinate and continue to encourage the use of tested Care Transitions Program models that integrate the medical and social service systems. This will smooth the transition of individuals from hospitals and nursing homes back to their communities and homes.

Barbara Quirk is a Madison geriatric nurse practitioner. Tandbquirk@aol.com
 

What a Tangled Web They Weave

Nursing home partners in the ownership and operation of hundreds of nursing homes are fighting and suing each other for the fraud they have perpetuated for the last decade.   New York real estate investor and nursing home owner/operator Rubin Schron is suing his partners (in fraud) Troutman Sanders, Leonard Grunstein, and Murray Forman.  See Complaint here.

Schron accuses Troutman, Grunstein, and Murray Forman of breaching their fiduciary duties to benefit themselves at Schron's expense, according to this report by Bloomberg.  The Am Law Daily reported on federal charges against Schron, Grunstein, and Forman over their involvement in a $50 million kickback scheme with nursing homes and pharmaceutical providers. In February all three reached a $14 million civil settlement with federal prosecutors in Boston. 

"This case is about the systemic exploitation by self-interested attorneys and bankers of clients who entrusted them to devise and implement the terms of complex business deals that these defendants arranged and advocated for their clients," states Schron in his 97-page complaint.  Grunstein served as principal outside legal adviser to the real estate investor and his companies from the 1980s until late last year. The suit accuses Grunstein of causing "hundreds of millions in dollars of damages" to Schron.  Also named as defendants are Grunstein's brother and business associate, Harry Grunstein, and Troutman M&A and project finance partner Lawrence Levinson. 

"Grunstein facilitated his tortious conduct by his association with these firms," states Schron's complaint. "Grunstein frequently used their letterhead for his schemes, and he was assisted by the active complicity of several partners, including defendant Levinson. In reward for facilitating Grunstein's misdeeds, these law firms received tens of millions of dollars in legal fees from Schron and the Schron Entities."

The complaint further claims that Grunstein and Forman brought investment opportunities to Schron that they themselves took stakes in without contributing cash or assuming risk. Schron claims that he alone bore the risk from these transactions, with Grunstein and Forman later becoming involved in a series of deals in the nursing home business that drew the attention of federal prosecutors.

The trio have been caught up in a tangle of litigation. Grunstein and Forman filed suit against Schron in March, claiming he misappropriated funds from entities created by the two business partners and failed to keep and maintain audited financial statements.  "Underlying all of the claims in this action is Schron's pattern of betraying the trust placed in him," state Grunstein and Forman in their 38-page complaint,. Grunstein and Forman are seeking $100 million in damages from Schron, several of his relatives, and their affiliated holding companies. 
 


 

Nursing Home investigated for Abuse

The Winston-Salem Journal had an article about Clemmons Nursing and Rehab Center possibly losing the ability to be reimbursed by Medicaid and Medicare for failing to follow OBRA regulations and other standards of care.  Clemmons is facing federal and state claims that it isn't properly caring for residents after investigators found that employees injured a patient by carelessly picking her up out of a wheelchair and throwing her onto her bed.  The state's investigation cited concerns about residents' physical and mental health and said the nursing home failed to comply with its policies and procedures, such as filing timely reports on incidents.  The center also was cited by the state for not properly observing residents' medication regimens and not properly cleaning some female residents' genitals.

Medicare may no longer make payments to the center for new inpatient services, and would only make payments for up to 30 days for patients admitted before June 19.  However, federal and state agencies have in the past extended the compliance deadline, depending primarily on whether the facility shows initiative in addressing deficiencies.

Clemmons is operated by Forsyth Health Investors LLC. The center has 120 beds and 71 residents.  The center also received a notice, dated June 1, that its state certification was in immediate jeopardy. 

The state agency recommended to Medicare that the center be fined a civil penalty of $10,000 for each incident.  A survey by the federal Medicare and Medicaid agency, released in December, gave the center two out of five stars, with five being the highest. The rankings focus on three categories -- health inspections, staffing and quality measures.

See full report here.

Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement

The Center for Medicare Advocacy has been publishing a series of alerts regarding the Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act of 2010 and Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. See link to their most recent one which focuses on the nursing home provisions of the bill.

Title IV, Subtitle B, of PPACA – Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement – addresses a variety of nursing home issues.

 

Part 1: Improving Transparency of Information

 

PPACA § 6101. Disclosure of Ownership and Additional Disclosable Parties. Effective immediately and upon request, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and nursing facilities (NFs) must make available to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), HHS Inspector General, the state, and the state long-term care ombudsman information about nursing home ownership (specifically, each member of the governing board, additional disclosable entities [which are defined as persons or entities that (1) exercise operational, financial, or managerial control over the facility or part of the facility or that provide policies and procedures or financial or cash management services; (2) lease or sublease real property to the facility; or (3) provide management or administrative services, management or clinical consulting services, or accounting of financial services to the facility]). Two years after enactment of the law (March 2012), the Secretary of HHS must publish final regulations. Ninety days after final regulations are published (June 2012), SNFs and NFs must report the information to the Secretary in a standardized format. One year after final regulations are published (March 2013), the Secretary must make the information available to the public.

 

PPACA § 6102. Accountability Requirements for Skilled Nursing Facilities and Nursing Facilities. Two years after enactment of the law (March 2012), HHS must publish final regulations for an effective compliance and ethics program, which may include a model compliance program. Three years after enactment of the law (March 2013), SNFs and NFs must have compliance and ethics programs in operation to prevent and detect criminal, civil, and administrative violations of the Act and to promote quality of care. Three years after final regulations are promulgated (March 2015), HHS must evaluate whether the compliance and ethics programs changed deficiency citations or made other changes to measures of quality, and must submit a report to Congress. HHS must also implement, by regulations, a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) by December 31, 2011, which facilities must implement one year later.

 

PPACA § 6103. Nursing Home Compare Medicare Website. HHS must add to the official nursing home website, Nursing Home Compare, information about:

(1) Staffing data, including staffing turnover and tenure;

(2) Links to state internet sites, including links to the statements of deficiencies (reported on form #2567 and referred to as "2567s") and facility plans of correction;

(3) Standardized complaint form;

(4) Summary information on the number, type, severity, and outcome of substantiated complaints;

(5) Number of adjudicated instances of criminal violations by a facility or its employees that were committed in the facility, including those that involve abuse, neglect, exploitation, "or other violations or crimes that resulted in serious bodily injury."

The information must be presented "in a manner that is prominent, updated on a timely basis, easily accessible, readily understandable to consumers of long-term care services, and searchable."

 

HHS must establish a process to review the "accuracy, clarity of presentation, timeliness, and comprehensiveness" of information on Nursing Home Compare and make appropriate changes a year after enactment (March 2011).

 

To improve the timeliness of information on Nursing Home Compare, states must submit survey information to HHS no later than the date they send such information to facilities, and HHS must use the information to update the website "as expeditiously as practicable but not less frequently than quarterly."

 

The Special Focus Facility (SFF) program is mandated by statute. SFFs, defined as facilities that have "substantially failed to meet applicable requirements," must be surveyed at least every six months.

 

SNFs and NFs must have, and make available to anyone on request, reports about surveys and complaint investigations conducted within the prior three years. SNFs and NFs must post notice in a prominent and publicly accessible place that these reports are available.

 

HHS must provide guidance to states on establishing links to survey reports (2567s). States must maintain "a consumer-oriented website providing useful information to consumers," including 2567s, complaint investigation reports, and facility plans of correction.

 

HHS must develop a Consumer Rights Information Page on Nursing Home Compare that includes information and links on consumer rights and the survey process and state-specific information about services available through the state long-term care ombudsman.

 

PPACA § 6104. Reporting of Expenditures. Within one year after enactment (March 2011), HHS must redesign Medicare cost reports to require separate reporting of SNF expenditures for wages and benefits for direct care staff, including nurses and other medical and therapy staff. SNFs must begin using the new cost reports within two years of enactment (March 2012). Within 30 months of enactment (September 2013), HHS must categorize annual expenditures into four functional categories:

(1) Direct care staff;

(2) Indirect care (including housekeeping and dietary services);

(3) Capital assets; and

(4) Administrative services costs.

HHS must make the information available to interested parties on request.

 

PPACA § 6105. Standardized Complaint Form. Within one year after enactment (March 2011), HHS must develop a standardized complaint form that residents or persons acting on their behalf may use to file a complaint with a state survey agency or long-term care ombudsman program. States must establish a complaint resolution process that includes

(1) Procedures to assure accurate tracking of complaints,

(2) Procedures to determine the severity of complaints

(3) Procedures for complaint investigations, and

(4) Deadlines for responding to complaints.

In addition to the standardized form, complaints may still be submitted in other ways and formats, including orally.

 

PPACA § 6106. Ensuring Staffing Accountability. Within two years after enactment (March 2012), SNFs and NFs must submit, electronically to HHS, direct care staffing information (including agency and contract staff), "based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format." Staffing information must:

(1) Specify the category of worker;

(2) Include information on resident census and case mix;

(3) Include a regular reporting schedule;

(4) Include information on employee turnover and tenure and hours of care per resident per day for each category of worker.

 

PPACA § 6107. GAO Study and Report on Five-Star Quality Rating System. Within two years of enactment (March 2012), the Government Accountability Office must submit a report to Congress on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services's (CMS) Five-Star Quality Rating System, addressing how the system is being implemented, problems, and suggested improvements.

 

Part 2: Targeting Enforcement

 

PPACA § 6111. Civil money penalties. HHS may reduce a civil money penalty (CMP) by not more than 50% if a SNF or NF "self-reports and promptly corrects a deficiency for which a penalty was imposed." A reduction is not available for (1) a deficiency if HHS had reduced a CMP in the previous year with respect to a repeat deficiency and (2) a deficiency reflecting a pattern of harm or widespread harm, immediate jeopardy, or a resident's death. HHS must publish regulations providing for independent informal dispute resolution (IIDR). HHS may require placement of CMPs in an escrow account. SNFs or NFs that succeed on their appeals may receive the amounts collected plus interest.

 

CMP funds may be used for (1) activities "that benefit residents," including protecting residents whose facility closes or is decertified; (2) projects supporting resident and family councils and other consumer involvement in assuring quality care in facilities; and (3) facility improvement initiatives approved by HHS, including joint training of facility staff and surveyors, technical assistance, and appointment of temporary management firms.

 

Note: In an apparent drafting error, the law provides that per-day CMPs "may not be imposed" for any day during the period beginning on the initial day of the imposition of the penalty and ending on the day on which the [independent] informal dispute resolution process is completed. It is presumed that Congress meant that penalties would not be required to be placed in escrow accounts until completion of the IIDR process.

 

PPACA § 6112. National Independent Monitor Demonstration Project. Within one year of enactment (March 2011), HHS must begin a two-year demonstration project "to develop, test, and implement an independent monitor program to oversee interstate and large intrastate chains" of SNFs and NFs. HHS will choose chains from among those that apply for the project, focusing on chains with "serious safety and quality of care problems." The independent monitor analyzes the chain's compliance; conducts sustained oversight; analyzes management; reports his/her findings to the chain, HHS, and relevant states; and publishes the results. A chain must respond to the monitor's findings by submitting a report within 10 days, indicating corrective actions it will take or the reasons it will not implement the recommendations. A chain is responsible for "a portion of the costs associated" with the monitor. HHS must evaluate the demonstration in a report to Congress.

 

PPACA § 6113. Notification of Facility Closure. A SNF or NF administrator must provide written notice of a voluntary closure to HHS, state long-term care ombudsman, residents, and legal representatives 60 days in advance of the closure. Advance notice of a termination will be at the discretion of HHS. The administrator must ensure that no new residents are admitted after the date that written notice of closure is provided. The notice of closure must include (1) a plan (approved by the state) for the transfer and adequate relocation of all residents and (2) assurances that the residents will be transferred to the most appropriate facility or other setting in terms of quality, services, and location, taking into consideration the needs, choice, and best interests of each resident. HHS may continue payments until all residents are successfully relocated. An administrator who fails to comply with these requirements may be subject to a CMP of up to $100,000 and may be excluded from federal payment programs.

 

PPACA § 6114. National Demonstration Projects on Culture Change and Use of Information Technology in Nursing Homes. Within one year of enactment (March 2011), HHS will implement two three-year demonstration projects, one on "culture change" and the other on the use of information technology in nursing homes.

 

Part 3: Improving Staff Training

 

PPACA § 6121. Dementia and Abuse Training. Initial training for nurse aides must include "dementia management training and patient abuse prevention training." HHS may also require such training in aides' ongoing training.

 

ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ADDRESSING NURSING HOME ISSUES

 

PPACA § 6201. Nationwide Program for National and State Background Checks on Direct Patient Access Employees of Long-Term Care Facilities and Providers. HHS must establish a nationwide program "to identify efficient, effective, and economical procedures" for background checks of workers with direct patient access, modeled on the pilot program conducted under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. The procedures must include search of state-based abuse and neglect registries, state and Federal criminal history records, and a fingerprint check. States must:

(1) Conduct the screening and criminal history background checks;

(2) Monitor compliance by long-term care facilities and providers;

(3) Provide for provisional employment, up to 60 days, for employees and for direct on-site supervision for employees pending completion of an appeal process;

(4) Provide for an independent appeal process for a provisional employee or employee to dispute the accuracy of information;

(5) Provide for a single state agency to be responsible for overseeing the process (including specifying the disqualifying offenses).

The federal match for a state program must be three times the state amount, not exceeding $3 million. The nationwide program applies to SNFs, NFs, home health agencies, hospice providers, adult day care providers, and residential care providers that arrange for or directly provide long-term care services, "including an assisted living facility that provides a level of care established by the Secretary." The Office of Inspector General must evaluate the nationwide program and submit a report to Congress.

 

PPACA § 6703. Grants and Training to the Ombudsman Program on Abuse and Neglect. This provision, part of the Elder Justice Act, provides grants and training to the ombudsman program on abuse and neglect. It also establishes a National Training Institute for Federal and State Surveyors to improve surveyor training in abuse and neglect, provides for grants to improve state survey agencies' complaint investigation systems, and requires a study on establishing a national nurse aide registry.

 

PPACA § 10325. Revision to Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System. Revisions to the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for SNFs are delayed from October 1, 2010 to October 1, 2011, except for changes to concurrent therapy and the look-back period, which were published in the final PPS regulations on August 11, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 40288). The Minimum Data Set 3.0 will become effective October 1, 2010.
 

Survival Rates in LTAC hospitals

Survival among Medicare beneficiaries who have been transferred to long-term acute-care hospitals is poor, according to a study published in the June 9 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association.  To analyze long-term-care trends, researchers used the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files from 1997 to 2006, which included all Medicare hospitalizations involving admission to an intensive-care unit of an acute-care, non-federal hospital in the continental U.S.

The findings showed that the number of LTAC hospitals grew to 408 in 2006 from 192 in 1997, while the number of admissions to those facilities increased to 40,353 from 13,732, and costs rose to $1.32 billion from $484 million. In that time, the study showed, transferred patients had higher number of co-morbidities—5 from 1997 to 2000 compared with 5.8 between 2004 and 2006. Meanwhile, mortality rates remained high throughout the study period, increasing to 52.2% between 2004 and 2006 from 50.7% between 1997 and 2000.


 

Settlement in fall/pressure ulcer case

Levin & Perconti reported on their blog that they helped the family of a victim of nursing home abuse in their settlement against the Mercy Health Care Rehabilitation Center, securing a $690,000 settlement for the 87-year-old victim's family.

The victim was initially admitted to the nursing home after suffering a stroke that caused her some left-sided weakness. When she entered the nursing home she required supervision and needed assistance with activities. She was known to be a fall risk. However, despite the nursing home’s knowledge of her fall risk, they allowed her to fall. She suffered a right femur fracture which was treated with a brace. While still in the nursing home’s care, she suffered a skin breakdown from the brace rubbing against her leg. This breakdown still went untreated by the nursing home staff and the victim developed Osteomyelitis. The combination of the fracture and the infection contributed to the victim’s death seven months later, according to the settlement report.

The nursing home negligence complaint alleged that the defendant nursing home failed to appropriately develop, implement or revise a care plan to address the decedent’s fall risk and failed to ensure that the decedent received proper supervision to prevent falls. It also stated that after her fall, the nursing home failed to provide preventative measures to avoid the development of skin breakdown, and failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to promote the healing of the decedent’s skin breakdown.

The Sad Plight of Crystal Rader

I ran across a couple of articles on Crystal Rader.  Born with muscular dystrophy, Rader requires a motorized wheelchair to get around.  Rader enjoys leaving the nursing home for activities and the wheelchair is the only way she can participate.  Her current wheelchair is six years old and ready to break down.   Rader bought it for $35,000 (with assistance of Medicaid) six years ago,

She applied to Colorado's Medicaid program for assistance for a new wheelchair. Medicaid denied her request, claiming in its rejection letter that the wheelchair is unavailable to her under the state's Durable Medical Equipment Program because she lives at the Fort Collins Health Care Center, a nursing home owned and operated by Sava Senior Care, therefore, the nursing home should provide the wheelchair and then presumably get reimbursed by Medicaid later.

"If they live in a long-term care or nursing facility, we do not pay for durable medical equipment unless that person is within 14 days of discharge," Department of Health Care Policy and Financing spokeswoman Joanne Lindsey said.   The state pays the Fort Collins Health Care Center for medical and equipment costs.

Rader said she isn't confident the Fort Collins Health Care Center, which is owned by Atlanta-based Sava Senior Care, will help her get a new chair.

"For a 26-year-old to be stuck in bed is horrible," Rader said. "It scares me. I lose all my activities I like to do."

I wonder why the local Ombudsman isn't involved?
A fund has been set up to help Crystal Rader replace her aging motorized wheelchair. 

 

Rader has set up a fund at Wells Fargo Bank to take donations for a new chair. Donations can be made to Crystal Rader's New Power Wheelchair Fund at any Fort Collins Wells Fargo branch.

See articles from the Coloradoan here and here.

Veteran Benefits for LTC

In honor of Memorial Day and all our veterans, I thought I would share Anne Hart's column from the Sacramento Organizing Examiner which discussed assistance for veterans such as such as "a sizable cash benefits check each month-- if you or a spouse of a veteran are frail and need in-home help. 

The article emphasizes that you don't have to pay anyone or invest money to get your long-term care veterans benefits. Unfortunately there's typically a waiting list to get into nursing homes for veterans.  Did you know that if you're a veteran, help is available--?

Bob Scrivano is an independent senior care planning consultant quoted in the article. Also see the site, Veterans America: Improving Pension Benefits and Assets & Aging. The basic message is that you have to organize now what you want to have happen to your home or any other assets you have, and you have to act on any plan of what to do if you or any family member becomes in need of in-home or nursing home care.

What you need to know is what you're entitled to, how not to lose your home when the state tries to take it away to pay for nursing home or medical bills, or what to watch out for as you act on your plan. 

"If you're married to a veteran or are a veteran and are looking for veteran's benefits for long-term care or in-home care for an older person who needs assisted living, such as someone coming into the home to care for the older person, watch out for scams and schemes. There's too many people being mailed information about VA benefits for long-term care that requires you to invest in something or pay for something. You don't have to buy anything."

Visit the Department of Veterans Affairs to download a Veterans Benefits fact sheet or call the VA at 1-800-827-1000 to obtain information about available services in your area. And check out the Veterans Health Administration to view available programs and services.


 

Criminal Liability

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts made a horrible decision by rejecting the Attorney General's attempt to prosecute Life Care Centers of America for the death of a resident.  See article from The Boston Globe here.  In 2007, Coakley’s prosecutors convinced a Middlesex grand jury to return a manslaughter charge against Life Care, a Tennessee-based operator of nursing homes nationwide.

Life Care Centers of America was charged with manslaughter because numerous employees willfully violated the standard of care by failing to safeguard a resident who died when she fell down steps after her wheelchair overturned.  McCauley was unsupervised in her wheelchair at 7 a.m. without an alert device on her wrist that closes the facility’s doors.  The Globe reported in 2007 that McCauley had a habit of wandering away. Doctors ordered her to have a device put on her wrist that sets off an alarm and closes the center’s doors when patients get near them. She apparently wheeled herself through the double doors and fell down eight steps.

The Attorney General attempted to hold Life Care Centers of America criminally liable for the “aggregate actions’’ of all the employees she said played a role in the failed care of Julia McCauley.  “A corporation may be criminally liable for the crimes alleged here only where at least one of its employees could be found individually liable for the crime,’’ Justice Judith Cowin wrote for the court.

The SJC ruling does not end the criminal case because Coakley may be able to pursue a manslaughter prosecution on a different legal theory — that the actions of a single supervisor caused the woman’s death.

 



 

Poliakoff & Associates, P.A., is one of South Carolina’s most respected and distinguished law firms. The Poliakoff firm began nearly 60 years ago by three attorney brothers: Matthew, J. Manning, and Bernard. With a history of believing the justice system...More...