Fines reduced for abuse and neglect

Florida's State Journal Register ran an article about Golden Moments Senior Care Center in Jacksonville that was fined only $20,000 after one of its nurse's aides terrorized several elderly and sick residents.  The nursing home agreed to pay a reduced fine.  Golden Moments and the Illinois Department of Public Health worked out a deal in which the 113-bed facility will pay a $6,500 fine connected with the nurse's aide's conduct, said department spokeswoman Melaney Arnold.

The complaint said Golden Moments nurse's aide Jessie L. Ross "displayed a pattern of abusive behavior toward residents". That behavior included telling a resident to "go to hell," slapping the resident and depriving the resident of soda and snacks. Ross slapped a different resident, threatened to slit his throat, kicked the resident and held the resident's hands against his chest. Ross also allegedly hid another resident's nail polish and slapped that resident across the face. 

A state inspection report indicated residents had been complaining to staff members about the aide's conduct for weeks, and that several staff members observed, knew about or suspected physical and mental abuse was going on but failed to report the situation to their superiors.  Ross, who told Public Health officials she was training to become a nurse, is fighting the discipline, which hasn't been finalized.

"I find the decision to reduce the fine against Golden Moments for the abuse of residents to be incomprehensible," said Jamie Freschi, regional long-term care ombudsman who works for Springfield's "I CARE" social service agency. "The system has a responsibility to look out for the safety of the residents, not the interests of the facilities."

Officials from the state and federal governments are considering new fines against Golden Moments Senior Care Center after the Oct. 3 death of a 74-year-old resident who choked on food.   A Springfield-based advocate for nursing home residents said she was appalled by the fine reduction and noted that central Illinois nursing homes charge $4,000 to $5,000 a month for the care of one resident.

Golden Moments resident Adam Waelz was pronounced dead Oct. 3 after choking on food provided by the nursing home, Morgan County Coroner Jeff Lair said.   According to a state inspection report, Waelz, who was developmentally disabled, was known to be at risk of choking and often ate or drank too fast and should have been closely supervised while in the dining room.

The day of his death, Waelz, who had no teeth, should have received ham that was ground up, but he instead received ham that had been torn into pieces, according to the report. Lair's death investigation found ham pieces and mashed potatoes from Waelz's mouth lying next to his body. An autopsy revealed a wad of ham pieces the "size of a tangerine" in his windpipe, according to the state report.

Other problems described in the report included failure to keep residents clean, failure to prevent new bed sores from developing on several residents, and failure to provide activities for residents housed in an Alzheimer's unit.

 

Star-Tribune Series Part 2

The second part of the Star-Tribune's investigation into fatal falls at nursing homes concentrate on the lack of sanctions.  Seventeen days after Agnes Johnson died, state investigators drove out to the White Community Hospital and Nursing Home to interview the staff.  An aide told them she had turned away momentarily while using a mechanical lift to maneuver Johnson from her bed to a wheelchair, and Johnson slipped from the device's sling to the floor, breaking her shoulder and thigh. The OHFC concluded that she died from neglect. It concluded that the aide violated the home's guidelines requiring two people to perform lifts, according to a report. It also determined the nursing home had not properly trained the aide to use the lift.  Despite the mistakes and Johnson's death, the OHFC did not cite the nursing home for violating state and federal regulations. The state found neglect in 17 cases statewide since 2004 where residents were seriously injured or died after falling out of lifts. It has issued citations for errors in only three cases.

When a Minnesota investigation finds that a nursing home was at fault, regulators require nothing more of the nursing home if it fired the worker involved or developed a corrective plan before investigators arrived. Minnesota rarely issues fines against nursing homes.  That is why some health care advocates question the OHFC's effectiveness in holding nursing homes accountable for abuse and neglect -- including falls.  They question a regulatory approach in which more than 1,000 Minnesota deaths were attributed to falls in nursing homes from 2002 through 2008, but the OHFC fully investigated only about 75 of those.

Federal officials audit the OHFC's process for evaluating reports of all types of incidents -- including falls -- and triaging them for possible investigation.  In the past two years, the OHFC has not met federal standards in how it selects cases to investigate.  Last year, federal auditors said that in a sample of complaints, OHFC triaged only 60 percent correctly.

In one of the sampled cases, the OHFC declined to do an on-site investigation into whether a nursing home was using mechanical lifts correctly and if the facility was following physician orders for medical checkups after injury. The auditors said the case should have been given the highest possible priority because other residents who were being moved with lifts were at risk.

But Minnesota's practice of not routinely issuing citations has a drawback, she acknowledged. To help consumers shop for nursing homes, the federal government developed a five-star quality rating that uses the number of citations issued against each home as part of the rating. That means that some substantiated cases of neglect are not reflected in the ratings for Minnesota homes.

In 2005, two nurses aides at Viewcrest Health Center were using a mechanical lift to move a resident from a wheelchair to bed. Without warning, the sling tore and the elderly woman fell to the floor.  The fall left her in great pain and her overall condition deteriorated. Six days later, she died. OHFC investigators discovered that Viewcrest was using a sling that had been patched to fix a broken strap, despite the manufacturer's recommendation to discard and not repair damaged slings. Despite the harm to the resident, the OHFC did not cite Viewcrest for violating government rules.

Viewcrest was found at fault in 2006, when the OHFC ruled that the nursing home didn't properly care for a resident, a known falls risk, who fell and broke her neck. The OHFC did issue citations in that case. Two years later, in 2008, the OHFC again cited Viewcrest because it didn't develop a care plan to help a resident who had fallen 11 times. But in the same year, the OHFC determined Viewcrest was at fault when a resident rolled off a bed and broke her leg while being cared for by a nurses aide. The state regulators said the facility did a poor job training the aide to care for the resident. No citations were issued. Then, in 2009, there was another fall-related incident at Viewcrest. The staff left a resident, who was at risk for falls, alone in his wheelchair and did not activate an alarm that would have sounded as he fell and cut his head. For a third time in four years, the OHFC declined to issue citations for mistakes the home made that resulted in falls.

Helen Fellerman, 93, had a rare disease that made her particularly prone to bleeding. She was also unsteady, forgetful and had a history of falls. So alarms were attached to her bed and wheelchair at Stillwater Good Samaritan Center so staff members would know when she was on the move. But when Fellerman tumbled from her wheelchair on the night of Aug. 31, 2005, the alarm did not go off, an OHFC report noted. She had been left alone for about 30 minutes. She died three days later. The fall had caused bleeding inside her skull, made worse by her medical condition.

 

 

 

SunWest Management fined $8 million

Oregonlive.com had an article about the $8 million in fines Oregon issued against Sunwest Management, several of its affiliates and former CEO, claiming the chain of assisted living centers misled investors, lied about the true condition of the company and used unlicensed salespeople to sell unregistered securities.

The Oregon Division of Finance and Corporate Securities issued civil penalties of $4.2 million against Jon Harder, co-founder and former CEO of the Salem company. It also levied fines of $3.8 million against Sunwest and several of its affiliate companies.  However, Oregon will hold off on collecting the money as long as Harder and the companies comply with the terms of any agreements or orders issued by U.S. District Court or the receiver appointed to oversee the case in March, after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued Sunwest and Harder making many claims similar to the state's.  Harder and his team formed a company for each of the nearly 300 assisted living centers it acquired or built. Numerous subsidiary companies controlled by Harder offered other services. If the state actually recovers any money from Harder or the Sunwest companies, it intends to put the money into a restitution fund for investors.

 

 

 

Regulatory enforcement is lacking

The DesMoines Register had an article about the outrageous delays in disciplinary actions in Iowa.  I am sure it has something to do with all the political campaign contributions given by the nursing home industry to Iowa politicians. The state board that disciplines Iowa's nursing home administrators hasn't issued any sanctions in two years and isn't reviewing the state's own care facility inspection reports.  The Board is made up of industry lobbyists and insiders, and doesn't even have the requisite number of citizen representatives.  Of the two most recent citizen representatives, one is a former hospital lobbyist with a poor record of attendance at board meetings, and the other resigned in protest last year after complaining that she had been marginalized by the board.

The chairman is a former nursing home administrator who recently resigned from a Waterloo care facility for "confidential personnel reason". He admits that some cases of abuse and neglect aren't being reviewed by the board.  The records show that the board doesn't act even when the state's own regulators have alleged criminal wrongdoing.

The board is meant to protect the 24,000 residents of Iowa nursing homes. The board licenses and reviews the conduct of facility administrators who are ultimately responsible for meeting the needs of the residents. However, since 2001, the Board of Nursing Home Administrators has disciplined only nine of Iowa's 750 licensed administrators. In some cases, the discipline had no real effect, because the administrators were already retired from the profession or in prison.

Board records show how lengthy the delays can be:

- In January 2001, nursing home administrator Randy Downey was convicted of assault and jailed for physically attacking his wife in a care facility in front of the residents. Three years passed before the board took action by placing Downey's license on probation and imposing a $250 fine.

- In July 2003, Kenneth Opp was sentenced to prison for embezzling $400,000 from The Abbey, a Des Moines care facility. It wasn't until October 2004 that the board revoked his administrator's license.

- In 1999, Stanley Schryba was accused of sexually harassing a co-worker. In late 2003, the case was disposed of when Schryba agreed to refrain from renewing his license once it had expired. By that time, he had already moved from Iowa and retired.

Other cases that have resulted in no action by the board:

- In 2002, the administrator at Mapleleaf Health Care Center in Mount Pleasant failed to tell the state that a resident had been found dead with his or her head wedged between the mattress and side rail of a bed.

- In 2003, the administrator at Van Buren Good Samaritan Home in Keosauqua allegedly concealed information about a resident who died there after choking on a hot dog while left unattended in the dining room. Inspectors alleged the administrator failed to report the choking episode to the resident's physician and family, and falsely told the home's own medical director the resident had suffered a seizure.

- In 2004, the administrator at Davenport's Meadow Lawn Nursing Home was fired for transferring three residents to other care facilities simply because they "annoyed" her. The owner had allegedly ordered the administrator to apologize to the residents and tried to have them moved back to Meadow Lawn.

- In 2004, the administrator of the Stacyville Community Nursing Home was fired after she allegedly put a friend on the payroll, then routed more than $12,000 from a fund used for nursing services into a bank account she maintained with that friend.

- In 2007, ManorCare nursing home in West Des Moines was fined $12,500, and the federal government temporarily cut off Medicaid and Medicare funding for the home. One of the most serious allegations was tied to "resident dumping" - the practice of forcing out elderly residents once their savings are depleted and Medicaid begins paying for their care. The administrator allegedly told inspectors, "I don't want to fill up 120 beds with Medicaid long-term-care residents."
 

Small fines are no deterrent to bad care

Arizona Daily Star had an article about a ridiculously small fine issued against a nursing home for severe neglect of their residents.  Devon Gables has agreed to pay a state fine of only $1,450 after an investigation found several civil violations, including nearly a month's delay in getting a resident treatment for a skin problem that turned into a serious pressure sore.  State investigators found a total of 16 violations of state and federal rules and regulations governing long-term care at Devon Gables.

Among other things, Devon Gables staff did not immediately consult a physician about a resident's dark and reddened skin, which was rubbing against a wheelchair pedal. The resident ended up developing an infection that was serious enough to require hospitalization.  The state, which found several more violations during an inspection in April, gave the nursing home a state quality rating of "A" — the highest level, which denotes "excellent."

The Arizona Department of Health Services, which licenses nursing homes in the state, can only fine facilities a maximum of $500 per day for violations.

Other incidents cited in the state's report:
• The staff gave a narcotic drug to a resident who was documented as being allergic to narcotics.
• Investigators say the nursing home failed to develop a post-discharge plan for a resident who was released to an "unsafe environment" — a home with no electricity, and with dirt and mouse droppings on "counters and floors in virtually every room."
• Did not report to the state an allegation of abuse involving one resident. The allegation did not turn out to be substantiated, but state rules require any allegation of abuse be reported to the state within five days.
• Failed to document nursing assessments before and after three residents with end-stage renal disease went for dialysis.

Devon Gables is also the subject of three pending lawsuits in Pima County Superior Court alleging negligence, violations of the Arizona Adult Protective Services Act, and wrongful death in two of the cases. 

 
 

Should fines be limited to $10,000?

The State Journal-Register had an interesting article about how Illinois is challenging a decision by a Sangamon County Judge Zappa that puts a $10,000 limit on nursing home fines, but the ruling already has affected dozens of cases statewide.  Zappa issued his ruling in a case involving Peoria’s Rosewood Care Center, which had appealed a $25,000 fine stemming from the death of 95-year-old Katherine Martin in 2006.  Zappa found that the department violated state law and bypassed administrative rules when it began to impose fines of more than $10,000 several years ago. He barred the department from enforcing fines of more than $10,000 in past cases that remained pending and any future cases.

Public Health officials believe state law allowed them to boost fines to $50,000 whenever they determined that bad care directly caused a resident’s death. The department in 2006 also began issuing fines of at least $20,000 when residents sustained serious injuries connected with bad care.  High fines rightly punish and deter bad behavior, and promote better care.

Fines involving 40 Illinois nursing homes have been reduced, with the facilities agreeing to pay $10,000 or less, since the Feb. 13 decision.  I bet the facilities jumped at the chance to pay less than $10,000.   State officials are considering reducing individual fines that exceed $10,000 in more than 80 other cases going back to 2006.

The Department of Public Health hasn’t decided yet how to proceed in a pending case against Woodstock Residence, now known as Crossroads Care Center, in which the Woodstock nursing home was fined $300,000 — a record level — in May 2008. State regulators have investigated five suspicious deaths there, as well as a former employee who allegedly used drug cocktails on residents.

The article cited a few examples of cases in which fines against nursing homes have been reduced to $10,000 by the Illinois Department of Public Health because of Sangamon County Judge Leo Zappa’s order in February. These cases remain pending, and a final amount to be paid hasn’t been negotiated:

* Maryville Manor, Maryville: Original fine was $40,000, stemming from an Aug. 6, 2007, inspection that detailed a range of problems including multiple bedsores and pressure sores on residents, a lack of recreational activities and a situation in which a nurse’s aide resigned after injectable anti-anxiety medicine prescribed for a resident was found in the aide’s possession.

* Evergreen Nursing and Rehab Center, Effingham: Original fine was $25,000, stemming from a March 22, 2006, investigation into the June 22, 2005, death of an 84-year-old resident who suffocated after becoming caught in a bedrail that had a piece missing.

* Dearborn Court, Kankakee: Original fine was $30,000, stemming from a Sept. 4, 2007, investigation into the alleged physical assault of a 64-year-old female resident by two employees of the nursing home on Aug. 15, 2007. The employees allegedly hit the resident with plastic hangers, tied her up with a belt, punched her in the head and stomach and tried to choke her.

* Peachtree Estates, Jonesboro: Original fine was $20,000, stemming from a July 15, 2008, inspection that said the facility failed to obtain prompt medical attention for a 73-year-old female resident who fell and sustained a head injury June 19, 2008. About a month before that injury, the resident had fallen and broken her left arm; she also fell on June 20, 2008.

 

Nursing home fined for neglect

The Palm Beach Post had an article about  nursing home neglect that really pissed me off.  The nursing home resident that was neglected was a bilateral amputee with bed sores on his stumps and buttocks.  When a state inspector saw him, he was sleeping unattended in a wheelchair on the front walkway of the Azalea Court nursing home in West Palm Beach.  She noticed a lit cigarette smoldering on a towel covering the resident’s left stump. A 1-inch hole had burned into the towel and the edges of the fabric were glowing red. “Smoke was actively rising from the towel,” according to the inspection report. The man had been labeled a “safe smoker.”  The patient had been found asleep with a lighted cigarette on prior occasions. Two weeks earlier, a nurse found the man sitting outside the facility, sleeping with a lit cigarette in his mouth.

The incidents reflect the nursing home’s “intentional or negligent failure to provide adequate and appropriate health care,” state officials said in a complaint that called for a $31,000 fine against Azalea Court. As part of a settlement agreement, the fine was lowered this year to $11,000.

Azalea Court was also fined $5,000 this year when after state inspectors last year found maggots crawling out of the leg cast of a resident. That fine was initially $10,000. Azalea Court has appealed both fines to an administrative law judge.

The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration also has cited Azalea staff last year for failing to respond to an alarm connected to the front door of the facility that signals if people are leaving the facility.  In addition inspectors interviewed six residents who said they were scared to voice grievances with the facility for fear of retribution.  This is a common complaint in most nursing homes.  Residents are scared that the care will get worse if they complain or get a nurse in trouble.
 

Lack of staffing led to death and cover up

Tony Bartelme of The Post and Courier had a great article about Alzheimer's, violence, and a cover up in nursing homes using the story of Dwayne Walls. It is a tragic story and clearly preventable.  Below is a short summary of the article.  Dwayne Walls was a resident of Veterans' Victory House, a large nursing home near Walterboro, who suffered Alzheimer's.  One day, they moved Walls to another room and put a dangerously psychotic patient in his old one. His wife warned nurses that Walls would try to return to his old room. "They said they were going to really watch him. But at midnight, I got a call that he had gone to his room and gotten beaten to a pulp," she said.

One night Walls went into another patient's room and climbed in an empty bed. Moments later, another patient walked in. He was 88 years old and also had dementia.  A nursing aide saw the man hitting Walls with his cane. Walls was on the floor, bleeding and unconscious.  An ambulance took Walls to the emergency room and phoned Walls' wife, Judy Hand. That night and over the next four days, they told her that Walls had merely fallen; they didn't mention the beating. Walls spent the next week in bed, and Hand was at his side when he died.   The nursing home's doctor later would write in Walls' file that his patient had contracted fatal pneumonia after becoming "immobile," but that the beating didn't account for this immobility.

In December 2006, investigators with the U.S. Department of Justice visited the facility: Staff gave patients wrong foods and medications and too often used physical restraints to control behavior problems. They found that the facility was poorly equipped to handle combative Alzheimer's patients.

"There appears to be no formal behavior program for residents diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, placing residents at heightened risk for the use of physical or chemical restraints to control behavior, and placing them at heightened risk of physical assault by other residents who may become frustrated at their repetitive speech or wandering," investigators concluded.

The state Department of Mental Health owns the facility but has a contract with a private company called Advantage Veterans Services of Walterboro to run it. The company is affiliated with HMR Advantage Health Systems, which is based in Easley and operates 26 nursing homes in South Carolina and elsewhere in the Southeast.

Nearly 80,000 people in South Carolina have Alzheimer's, enough to fill the University of South Carolina's Williams-Brice Stadium, and that memory loss isn't the disease's only troubling effect: More than two-thirds will exhibit some form of agitation or combative behavior.  Aggressive behavior is a normal part of the brain's breakdown, nursing homes don't hire enough people to meet the needs of these patients. Many blacklist Alzheimer's and dementia patients with histories of aggression, leaving already stressed families and loved ones with few options.

There is no cure for Alzheimer's, but doctors are zeroing in on its causes. One leading theory involves proteins. Healthy people have stringlike proteins in their brain cells that normally curl like unfurled ribbons. These ribbons help nourish the cells. But in Alzheimer's patients, these ribbons get tangled, destroying the cells in the process, along with a person's memories and functions that control behavior.

 As happens with about 70 percent of Alzheimer's patients, Walls grew more agitated as the disease marched through his brain, though he was by no means the only person in the wing suffering these effects.  In 2008, staff at the Veterans' Victory House documented in his medical records how another resident pushed him to the floor one month, and how a month later Walls hit another resident in the head with his fist. In June 2008, a resident hit another, who fell into Walls and knocked him to the floor. In July, a staff member found Walls in another resident's bed, his fists balled.   By August, a month before Walls' death, staff noted that he was "aggressive to others and himself," particularly when he was scared. But then the storm clouds cleared. Staff noted on the day Walls was beaten that he had no behavior problems and was moving around well.

Walls had fallen and needed to go to the hospital for X-rays, a nurse said. She didn't mention the beating, or that a deputy had been called to investigate.  Hand drove to Walterboro the next Monday morning for a visit. "I walked into the room and gasped. He was black and blue all over, swollen and on oxygen. I ran out of the room and got a nurse. They came and I asked what had happened." Dwayne had fallen, they told her. Throughout the day, the home's employees stopped by to visit Walls to see how he was doing.  Later that afternoon, four days after the attack, she approached a staffer. "I said, 'He couldn't have possibly gotten that from a fall.' She looked at me and said, 'No one told you? He was beaten.' "  Colleton County Coroner Richard Harvey told her over the phone that the beating contributed to Walls' death, but she was surprised when the death certificate listed the cause as natural and didn't mention the altercation. In an interview, Harvey said he did an autopsy but the results showed that Walls died of pneumonia, not from any other injuries.

The doctor wrote the summary in November, two months after Walls' death, and after an ombudsman hired by the lieutenant governor's Office on Aging visited the home. The agency had received a complaint about "residents that beat other residents," low staffing levels and "residents sitting in soiled diapers."  After the visit, the ombudsman noted the altercation involving Walls but said the agency doesn't investigate resident-to-resident abuse.

The ombudsman nonetheless concluded, "There is a shortage of staff," after looking at the facility's staffing logs. The reports showed the Alzheimer's unit had just one licensed nurse on duty for 52 patients on morning shifts before and after Walls' attack. On one night shift, the wing had no licensed nurse at all. The ombudsman asked the nursing home to follow state regulations, which requires at least two licensed nurses during the morning shift and one on the night shift.

More recently, an investigator with the state Department of Health and Environmental Control made an unannounced visit to the home and found it hadn't properly reported the incident involving Walls and the 88-year-old man who beat him. State law requires nursing homes to report "serious incidents" involving residents who assault others.


 

 

 

Why are monetary fines set so low?

People always ask us why DHEC and other enforcement agencies don't fine facilities who neglect and abuse residents.  There is no one explanation.  Lack of enforcement tools.  Lack of qualified investigators.  Nursing home lobbying and campaign contributions.  Lack of media scrutiny.  I saw an article recently in the Journal Star discussing the limits placed on fines and the importance of monetary fines on quality of care and deterrence.  

The article starts with a simple proposition:  "When a nursing home resident's minor injury is left untreated and progresses to a major infection that ultimately kills her, the facility responsible should pay a stiff price.  When one resident beats another in a nursing home cafeteria because there's no staff member there to stop it, or when a male resident's catheter isn't checked and he gets a serious infection that still has him hospitalized, or when an octogenarian slides out of her wheelchair and is found dead with its seatbelt around her neck because nobody is watching, there ought to be fines that send a message that that's intolerable. And when a resident who takes a tumble complains of dizziness and head pain only to be told her problem will get checked out at an eye exam the next day, there ought to be strict accountability - especially when she ends up dying that next day."

That seems pretty straightforward and full of common sense but how do you decide what is a fair and reasonable fine?  Most states limit the amount of fines that a facility must pay.

A recent  ruling from a judge held that the Illinois Department of Public Health's is limited in fine amounts because State law appears to limit the fines the state can levy for these violations to $10,000 per incident.  The Legislature should amend state law to permit higher fines for abuse and/or neglect. The penalties must be severe enough that negligent nursing home operators will improve the conditions.

The article ends with some basic truths:  Most facilities are understaffed or suffering from burn out.  "Many homes don't staff above the minimal level required by the government, and the difference is often readily apparent. Adding to the problem is the high turnover rate in a workplace that can pay poorly yet require phenomenal dedication in bleak conditions. It's often worse in troubled facilities. It's a tough and trying job in the best of situations."

The residents of nursing homes are society's most vulnerable. They deserve a dignified and safe environment in which to live.   Increased fines, additional investigators, and improved staffing requirements would go a long way in providing the elderly and infirmed the care they need.

Life Care Center charged with manslaughter after neglecting a resident

Wickedlocal.com had a recent article about the wrongful death of a resident caused by the neglect and incompetence of the nursing home staff.  This death was clearly preventable if the facility was not understaffed and the employees were doing their jobs.

Julia McCauley was a resident who on the morning of Aug. 17, 2004, rolled her wheelchair unattended out the front door of the Life Care Center of Acton, and tumbled down a flight of stairs causing her death.  McCauley was not wearing a doctor-prescribed WanderGuard bracelet designed to set off an alarm and lock the doors if McCauley got too close to the exit.

Attorney General Martha Coakley’s office believes that McCauley’s death could have been avoided had she been wearing her electronic bracelet and that the nursing home’s parent company, Life Care Centers of America, is culpable.

Of course, Life Care Center officials deny any wrongdoing and refuse to accept responsibility.  What ever happened to accountability?  Life Care Center is charged with manslaughter and neglect of a long-term care facility resident.   If convicted, the Tennessee-based corporation would only face a possible fine not to exceed $6,000.

Life Care operates more than 200 facilities in 28 states, including several that have come under scrutiny in the past.  In 2005, the company paid $2.5 million to resolve allegations of billing Medicaid and Medicare for services that were never provided or were useless to the residents of a Lawrenceville, Ga., facility.

The Acton facility in the past was fined $2,112 in the fall of 2005 and $11,147 in December 2006 for various deficiencies found during routine state checks. In July 2007, state and federal regulators imposed fines totaling more than $164,000 for deficiencies that jeopardized residents’ safety. But the fines were rescinded after the facility promised to correct the deficiencies.

 

 

 

 

Poliakoff & Associates, P.A., is one of South Carolina’s most respected and distinguished law firms. The Poliakoff firm began nearlyMore...