Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement

The Center for Medicare Advocacy has been publishing a series of alerts regarding the Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act of 2010 and Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. See link to their most recent one which focuses on the nursing home provisions of the bill.

Title IV, Subtitle B, of PPACA – Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement – addresses a variety of nursing home issues.

 

Part 1: Improving Transparency of Information

 

PPACA § 6101. Disclosure of Ownership and Additional Disclosable Parties. Effective immediately and upon request, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and nursing facilities (NFs) must make available to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), HHS Inspector General, the state, and the state long-term care ombudsman information about nursing home ownership (specifically, each member of the governing board, additional disclosable entities [which are defined as persons or entities that (1) exercise operational, financial, or managerial control over the facility or part of the facility or that provide policies and procedures or financial or cash management services; (2) lease or sublease real property to the facility; or (3) provide management or administrative services, management or clinical consulting services, or accounting of financial services to the facility]). Two years after enactment of the law (March 2012), the Secretary of HHS must publish final regulations. Ninety days after final regulations are published (June 2012), SNFs and NFs must report the information to the Secretary in a standardized format. One year after final regulations are published (March 2013), the Secretary must make the information available to the public.

 

PPACA § 6102. Accountability Requirements for Skilled Nursing Facilities and Nursing Facilities. Two years after enactment of the law (March 2012), HHS must publish final regulations for an effective compliance and ethics program, which may include a model compliance program. Three years after enactment of the law (March 2013), SNFs and NFs must have compliance and ethics programs in operation to prevent and detect criminal, civil, and administrative violations of the Act and to promote quality of care. Three years after final regulations are promulgated (March 2015), HHS must evaluate whether the compliance and ethics programs changed deficiency citations or made other changes to measures of quality, and must submit a report to Congress. HHS must also implement, by regulations, a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) by December 31, 2011, which facilities must implement one year later.

 

PPACA § 6103. Nursing Home Compare Medicare Website. HHS must add to the official nursing home website, Nursing Home Compare, information about:

(1) Staffing data, including staffing turnover and tenure;

(2) Links to state internet sites, including links to the statements of deficiencies (reported on form #2567 and referred to as "2567s") and facility plans of correction;

(3) Standardized complaint form;

(4) Summary information on the number, type, severity, and outcome of substantiated complaints;

(5) Number of adjudicated instances of criminal violations by a facility or its employees that were committed in the facility, including those that involve abuse, neglect, exploitation, "or other violations or crimes that resulted in serious bodily injury."

The information must be presented "in a manner that is prominent, updated on a timely basis, easily accessible, readily understandable to consumers of long-term care services, and searchable."

 

HHS must establish a process to review the "accuracy, clarity of presentation, timeliness, and comprehensiveness" of information on Nursing Home Compare and make appropriate changes a year after enactment (March 2011).

 

To improve the timeliness of information on Nursing Home Compare, states must submit survey information to HHS no later than the date they send such information to facilities, and HHS must use the information to update the website "as expeditiously as practicable but not less frequently than quarterly."

 

The Special Focus Facility (SFF) program is mandated by statute. SFFs, defined as facilities that have "substantially failed to meet applicable requirements," must be surveyed at least every six months.

 

SNFs and NFs must have, and make available to anyone on request, reports about surveys and complaint investigations conducted within the prior three years. SNFs and NFs must post notice in a prominent and publicly accessible place that these reports are available.

 

HHS must provide guidance to states on establishing links to survey reports (2567s). States must maintain "a consumer-oriented website providing useful information to consumers," including 2567s, complaint investigation reports, and facility plans of correction.

 

HHS must develop a Consumer Rights Information Page on Nursing Home Compare that includes information and links on consumer rights and the survey process and state-specific information about services available through the state long-term care ombudsman.

 

PPACA § 6104. Reporting of Expenditures. Within one year after enactment (March 2011), HHS must redesign Medicare cost reports to require separate reporting of SNF expenditures for wages and benefits for direct care staff, including nurses and other medical and therapy staff. SNFs must begin using the new cost reports within two years of enactment (March 2012). Within 30 months of enactment (September 2013), HHS must categorize annual expenditures into four functional categories:

(1) Direct care staff;

(2) Indirect care (including housekeeping and dietary services);

(3) Capital assets; and

(4) Administrative services costs.

HHS must make the information available to interested parties on request.

 

PPACA § 6105. Standardized Complaint Form. Within one year after enactment (March 2011), HHS must develop a standardized complaint form that residents or persons acting on their behalf may use to file a complaint with a state survey agency or long-term care ombudsman program. States must establish a complaint resolution process that includes

(1) Procedures to assure accurate tracking of complaints,

(2) Procedures to determine the severity of complaints

(3) Procedures for complaint investigations, and

(4) Deadlines for responding to complaints.

In addition to the standardized form, complaints may still be submitted in other ways and formats, including orally.

 

PPACA § 6106. Ensuring Staffing Accountability. Within two years after enactment (March 2012), SNFs and NFs must submit, electronically to HHS, direct care staffing information (including agency and contract staff), "based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format." Staffing information must:

(1) Specify the category of worker;

(2) Include information on resident census and case mix;

(3) Include a regular reporting schedule;

(4) Include information on employee turnover and tenure and hours of care per resident per day for each category of worker.

 

PPACA § 6107. GAO Study and Report on Five-Star Quality Rating System. Within two years of enactment (March 2012), the Government Accountability Office must submit a report to Congress on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services's (CMS) Five-Star Quality Rating System, addressing how the system is being implemented, problems, and suggested improvements.

 

Part 2: Targeting Enforcement

 

PPACA § 6111. Civil money penalties. HHS may reduce a civil money penalty (CMP) by not more than 50% if a SNF or NF "self-reports and promptly corrects a deficiency for which a penalty was imposed." A reduction is not available for (1) a deficiency if HHS had reduced a CMP in the previous year with respect to a repeat deficiency and (2) a deficiency reflecting a pattern of harm or widespread harm, immediate jeopardy, or a resident's death. HHS must publish regulations providing for independent informal dispute resolution (IIDR). HHS may require placement of CMPs in an escrow account. SNFs or NFs that succeed on their appeals may receive the amounts collected plus interest.

 

CMP funds may be used for (1) activities "that benefit residents," including protecting residents whose facility closes or is decertified; (2) projects supporting resident and family councils and other consumer involvement in assuring quality care in facilities; and (3) facility improvement initiatives approved by HHS, including joint training of facility staff and surveyors, technical assistance, and appointment of temporary management firms.

 

Note: In an apparent drafting error, the law provides that per-day CMPs "may not be imposed" for any day during the period beginning on the initial day of the imposition of the penalty and ending on the day on which the [independent] informal dispute resolution process is completed. It is presumed that Congress meant that penalties would not be required to be placed in escrow accounts until completion of the IIDR process.

 

PPACA § 6112. National Independent Monitor Demonstration Project. Within one year of enactment (March 2011), HHS must begin a two-year demonstration project "to develop, test, and implement an independent monitor program to oversee interstate and large intrastate chains" of SNFs and NFs. HHS will choose chains from among those that apply for the project, focusing on chains with "serious safety and quality of care problems." The independent monitor analyzes the chain's compliance; conducts sustained oversight; analyzes management; reports his/her findings to the chain, HHS, and relevant states; and publishes the results. A chain must respond to the monitor's findings by submitting a report within 10 days, indicating corrective actions it will take or the reasons it will not implement the recommendations. A chain is responsible for "a portion of the costs associated" with the monitor. HHS must evaluate the demonstration in a report to Congress.

 

PPACA § 6113. Notification of Facility Closure. A SNF or NF administrator must provide written notice of a voluntary closure to HHS, state long-term care ombudsman, residents, and legal representatives 60 days in advance of the closure. Advance notice of a termination will be at the discretion of HHS. The administrator must ensure that no new residents are admitted after the date that written notice of closure is provided. The notice of closure must include (1) a plan (approved by the state) for the transfer and adequate relocation of all residents and (2) assurances that the residents will be transferred to the most appropriate facility or other setting in terms of quality, services, and location, taking into consideration the needs, choice, and best interests of each resident. HHS may continue payments until all residents are successfully relocated. An administrator who fails to comply with these requirements may be subject to a CMP of up to $100,000 and may be excluded from federal payment programs.

 

PPACA § 6114. National Demonstration Projects on Culture Change and Use of Information Technology in Nursing Homes. Within one year of enactment (March 2011), HHS will implement two three-year demonstration projects, one on "culture change" and the other on the use of information technology in nursing homes.

 

Part 3: Improving Staff Training

 

PPACA § 6121. Dementia and Abuse Training. Initial training for nurse aides must include "dementia management training and patient abuse prevention training." HHS may also require such training in aides' ongoing training.

 

ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ADDRESSING NURSING HOME ISSUES

 

PPACA § 6201. Nationwide Program for National and State Background Checks on Direct Patient Access Employees of Long-Term Care Facilities and Providers. HHS must establish a nationwide program "to identify efficient, effective, and economical procedures" for background checks of workers with direct patient access, modeled on the pilot program conducted under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. The procedures must include search of state-based abuse and neglect registries, state and Federal criminal history records, and a fingerprint check. States must:

(1) Conduct the screening and criminal history background checks;

(2) Monitor compliance by long-term care facilities and providers;

(3) Provide for provisional employment, up to 60 days, for employees and for direct on-site supervision for employees pending completion of an appeal process;

(4) Provide for an independent appeal process for a provisional employee or employee to dispute the accuracy of information;

(5) Provide for a single state agency to be responsible for overseeing the process (including specifying the disqualifying offenses).

The federal match for a state program must be three times the state amount, not exceeding $3 million. The nationwide program applies to SNFs, NFs, home health agencies, hospice providers, adult day care providers, and residential care providers that arrange for or directly provide long-term care services, "including an assisted living facility that provides a level of care established by the Secretary." The Office of Inspector General must evaluate the nationwide program and submit a report to Congress.

 

PPACA § 6703. Grants and Training to the Ombudsman Program on Abuse and Neglect. This provision, part of the Elder Justice Act, provides grants and training to the ombudsman program on abuse and neglect. It also establishes a National Training Institute for Federal and State Surveyors to improve surveyor training in abuse and neglect, provides for grants to improve state survey agencies' complaint investigation systems, and requires a study on establishing a national nurse aide registry.

 

PPACA § 10325. Revision to Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System. Revisions to the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for SNFs are delayed from October 1, 2010 to October 1, 2011, except for changes to concurrent therapy and the look-back period, which were published in the final PPS regulations on August 11, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 40288). The Minimum Data Set 3.0 will become effective October 1, 2010.
 

Taking Responsibility

Boston Herald had a great article about a family's attempt to learn the truth behind a document a resident allegedly signed while suffering from delusions and memory loss.  They hope to shed light on what she called an “outrageous and deceptive” practice.  Having demented residents sign their right to a jury trial away.  This is a tragic story that I hear all the time.  Resident clearly gets hurt by negligence of facility.  The facility, instead of taking responsibility, tortures the family by ridiculous legal machinations such as arbitration, health courts, malpractice tribunals.  This family has waited years for closure.

John J. Donahue died after suffering injuries at a Brockton nursing home in 2005.  Donahue, a paralyzed retired railroad engineer, spent the final 46 days of his life being shuffled between nursing homes and hospitals following an eye injury he suffered at Embassy House, Hoey said. On Sept. 5, 2005, Donahue’s left eye was gouged by a metal safety hook on a machine an employee was using to move him from his bed. Two people were supposed to operate the machine, called a Hoyer lift, per facility policy, according to a state investigation on the incident. The state Department of Public Health investigated Sept. 21, 2005, and found the allegation of neglect to be valid. The certified nursing assistant who operated the Hoyer machine alone was fired.

He was taken to the hospital more than 15 hours later, where his eye was removed. Donahue died weeks later of sepsis causing blood clots and organ failure. Hoey said experts will testify at trial that the eye trauma placed Donahue in a compromised state, which made him more susceptible to disease and infections.

Two years later, Owens filed a lawsuit alleging the nursing home’s negligence led to her father’s health decline, and in turn, his death.  The nursing home claimed that Donahue had signed an arbitration agreement in 2003, when he was 91, waiving his right to a trial if he was injured or killed.

Arbitration agreements are becoming more common at nursing homes and they are costly and time-consuming to contest, said Donahue’s attorney, David Hoey of North Reading.  Hoey said he fought the alleged agreement for two years, until the Court held the agreement was void based on testimony and records from staff at Embassy House Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Brockton.

In December 2003 - the month Donahue signed the agreement - staff noted that Donahue made “confused, depressed (and) delusional statements” and showed “delusional ideation,” according to the February 2009 Plymouth Superior Court order signed by Judge Charles J. Hely. Hely ruled that Donahue was “unable to act in a reasonable manner” on the arbitration contract and that Embassy House “had reason to know of this significantly impaired condition.”

On Feb. 9, a Superior Court medical tribunal cleared the case to go forward to trial.  In Massachusetts, medical malpractice lawsuits must be heard by a tribunal before going to trial.

Guilty plea in health care fraud case

St. Louis Today had an article about a criminal enterprise masquerading as a nursing home.  Luckily they got caught and the company pleaded guilty to fraud and will pay $1.6 million in fines and restitution.

When the Texas-based Cathedral Rock Corp. bought 11 Missouri and Illinois nursing homes in 2001, owner and CEO C. Kent Harrington told employees that residents were the first priority and would get "extra-special treatment."

The real priority was packing elderly and disabled clients into those homes — including five in the St. Louis area that were understaffed and provided substandard care, according to court documents and federal prosecutors.   Until 2005, the services "were grossly inadequate" and represented "a complete failure of care," Assistant U.S. Attorney Dorothy McMurtry said in court.

It also settled a whistle-blower civil lawsuit filed by nurses in 2003 that triggered what officials said was a relatively rare criminal prosecution of a nursing home over poor care.

Five Cathedral Rock-owned companies that ran those homes agreed to pay $1 million in criminal fines and penalties, and $628,000 in the civil settlement.  The companies will be formally sentenced in April, likely to some term of probation in addition to the fines and penalties.  So no one is going to jail for defrauding the government, stealing from medicare and medicaid, and directly causing the deaths of dozens of residents!

Among the claims was that the homes' staff doctored patient charts, falsified drug records and failed to give necessary medications. Some residents suffered from bed sores. Others wandered away. One ended up on a roof. One was found days later. One died after falling from a window.  The homes were repeatedly cited by regulators, fined and penalized.   Officials said the homes filed corrective plans but then failed to comply or "misrepresented" their efforts to comply.

"FTB (fill the beds) is everything," read a 2004 e-mail from a Cathedral Rock regional vice president to another executive. "Whereas compliance is important and cost control is as well, CENSUS is to be your primary focus," the e-mail read.

In 2004, Cathedral Rock had 2,600 beds in 25 nursing homes and assisted-living facilities in Missouri, Illinois, Texas, Ohio and South Carolina, Harrington said at the time.

Its website currently lists 1,308 beds in 15 homes in Texas and New Mexico. A spokesman said it no longer operates facilities in Missouri or Illinois.

 

Arbitration decision in Colorado

McKnight's had an article about a decision in Colorado regarding the enforcement of an arbitration clause in a nursing home case.  The Colorado court ruled that a healthcare proxy does not have the authority to sign an arbitration agreement on behalf of a nursing home resident.  Under Colorado law, a healthcare proxy is only empowered to make medical decisions on behalf of another, including “provision, withholding, or withdrawal of any health care, medical procedure, including artificially provided nourishment and hydration, surgery, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or service to maintain, diagnose, treat, or provide for a patient's physical or mental health or personal care,” the Bureau of National Affairs reported.

In the case of Lujan v. Life Care Centers of America, Colorado, Alvin Lujan signed an arbitration agreement, waiving jury trial rights, when admitting his mother, Estella Lujan, to the Life Care Centers of America nursing home. She died three days later, and a wrongful death claim was filed against the facility. Life Care Centers argued that admission to a nursing home is a medical decision and, therefore, the Colorado law applies.  But the Colorado Court of Appeals determined that the signing of an arbitration agreement does not fall under the specific definition of the authorities given to a healthcare proxy. As a result, the Lujan family had the right to sue the facility.

In October, the Nebraska Supreme Court arrived at a similar decision regarding the roll of patient surrogates
 

CapitalSource sale to Omega Health Investors

There have been several articles about the recent sale of nursing homes by CapitalSource.  The articles are unclear about which nursing homes will be sold.  Below are links and information from several articles.

McKnight's wrote that CapitalSource, commercial lending company to many nursing home chains, will sell off its long-term care interests to Omega Healthcare Investors in a deal valued $860 million.   The sale covers a CapitalSource lease portfolio that includes 143 long-term care facilities.  Under the deal, Omega Healthcare Investors, which already owns or holds mortgages for 254 skilled nursing and assisted living facilities, will assume $529 million in asset-related debt, and give CapitalSource $280 million cash and $51 million in OHI stock.   A second article from McKnight states that CapitalSource Inc.,sold the last of its nursing home interests. This marks the company's exit from the skilled nursing ownership business.  The latest sale takes CapitalSource out of nursing home ownership, but it says it will continue to provide financing for owners and operators of long-term-care facilities.

CapitalSource sold the 37 nursing homes to an undisclosed buyer for an all-cash price of $100 million, the company said in a statement. The money will be used to pay down debts associated with the properties. The sale is part of a wider sale of its net lease portfolio, including the already disclosed divestiture of 143 skilled nursing facilities to Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. CapitalSource will continue to provide financing for owners and operators in the long-term care industry, according to a company spokesman.

This final sale, along with the Omega sale and a Department of Housing and Urban Development mortgage financing deal, should net CapitalSource $495 million. The company said it would use these revenues to reduce the balance on its syndicated bank facility and add to overall company liquidity. The additional liquidity should put the company in a position to expand its healthcare lending franchise, the CapitalSource release said.

The Washington Post had an article on the sale stating that CapitalSource needed help to relieve the debt acquired during the recession.  CapitalSource is a specialty financing companies that has been hit hard by the credit crisis and the recession. Auditors at Bethesda-based American Capital issued an opinion earlier this year that the firm was in danger of not continuing as a business.  The company has disappointed analysts this year because of higher-than-expected losses on its loans to businesses and commercial real estate developers.

CapitalSource, which makes loans from $10 million to $100 million to nursing homes, said selling its 180 nursing homes is part of its transition to a bank. The company earlier this year changed its status from a publicly traded real estate investment trust to a bank.  James Pieczynski, who runs CapitalSource's health-care lending business, and Steven Museles, the company's chief legal officer, will become co-chief executives.

 

 

 

 

Georgia dumping violent prisoners into nursing homes

Macon.com posted an article about a proposal in Georgia to house sex offenders, violent offenders, those being electronically monitored and those with medical and mental health needs in nursing homes.   The state DOC is working with the state Board of Pardons and Paroles to recruit nursing homes, assisted-living facilities and other organizations interested in housing offenders upon release from prison.  Why would they be interested in bringing these dangerous people into the homes of our parents and grandparents?  The only reason is greed and reckless indifference to the safety of their other residents.

The statewide briefings are designed to serve as an "educational forum" for potential housing service providers, according to a Georgia Department of Corrections news release.  Briefings will be held across the state through February 2010. For more information about the meetings, contact LaTrese Schofield, residential coordinator for the state DOC, at schofl00@dcor.state.ga.us or (404) 463-2947.

Please contact Ms. Schofield and tell her this is a bad idea.

 

Health Care Reform Bill includes new rules for nursing homes

NCCNHR (formerly the National Citizens' Coalition for Nursing Home Reform) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit membership organization founded in 1975 by Elma L. Holder to protect the rights, safety and dignity of America's long-term care consumers.   NCCNHR issued the following Bulletin:

The health care reform bill passed by the House of Representativesbefore includes not only sweeping health insurance reforms but also nursing home transparency, criminal background checks on long-term care workers, and a voluntary payroll deduction system that would provide benefits for long-term care services. The bill, H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, can be downloaded at http://thomas.loc.gov.

 

As expected, the bill includes-without amendment-nursing home transparency provisions requiring:

1)  Public disclosure of individuals and entities that own, govern, operate, finance, provide services to, and/or control the nation's nursing homes.

2)  Compliance and ethics programs and internal quality assurance programs in nursing homes, and pilot projects to test ways to improve oversight of chains.

3)  Collection and reporting of staffing information based on payroll data, including hours of care per resident day, turnover and retention rates, and facility expenditures for wages and benefits.

4)  A review of Nursing Home Compare and addition of information about sanctions against facilities and the number of adjudicated crimes occurring in them.

5)  A categorical breakdown of expenditures on cost reports to show how much facilities spend on direct care versus other expenses.

6)  An improved state complaint process to help protect complainants against retaliation.

7)  An increase in federal civil monetary penalties and a process to hold CMPs in escrow during appeals (although only after an independent informal dispute resolution process was completed).
8)  Adequate notification when facilities decided to close, including the option for the government to continue reimbursement until relocation was achieved.

9)  Training of nursing assistants in dementia care and abuse prevention.

10)  The bill would authorize a program of national criminal background checks on all long-term care workers who have access to residents or patients--from those who provide in-home long-term care services to nursing home employees.

H.R. 3962 also incorporates the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act to create a national voluntary social insurance system through which enrollees who became disabled (after paying into the system for at least five years) could purchase community-based long-term care, services or supports. Nursing home residents who were Medicaid beneficiaries could retain 5 percent of their benefit, in addition to their personal needs allowance, for their personal use while the remainder was applied to the cost of their care. (See page 1562 of the bill.)

 

Last-minute efforts to add the Elder Justice Act to H.R. 3962 were not successful. The EJA is in the health care reform bill passed by the Senate Finance Committee.

 

 

 

Money-Driven Medicine film

A friend of mine who is interested in nursing homes sent me a link to Money-Driven Medicine: Patients for Sale.  I have not seen the movie but the trailer looks interesting.

Money-Driven Medicine provides the essential introduction Americans need to become knowledgeable participants in healthcare reform.   Based on Maggie Mahar's acclaimed book, Money Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Health Care Costs So Much, the film offers a behind-the-scenes look at how our 2.6 trillion dollar a year healthcare system went so terribly wrong and what it will take to fix it.

The U.S. spends twice as much per person on healthcare as the average developed nation, fully one-sixth of our GDP - yet our outcomes, especially for chronic diseases, are very often worse.  The U.S. is the only industrialized nation that has chosen to turn medicine into a largely unregulated, for-profit business. 

In Money-Driven Medicine, Dr. Donald Berwick, president of the Institute for Health Care Improvement, explains: “We get more care, but not better care.” Our fee-for-service system channels resources into the high-tech, high-cost “rescue care” patients need after they become critically ill, while it skimps on the preventive primary care which could keep them out of the hospital in the first place. As a consequence, emergency rooms overflow while family practitioners are becoming an endangered species. Medical students explain that these perverse pay incentives drive them away from primary care into higher-paying specialties.

Medical ethicist Larry Churchill doesn’t mince words: “The current medical care system is not designed to meet the health needs of the population. It is designed to protect the interests of insurance companies, pharmaceutical firms, and to a certain extent organized medicine. It is designed to turn a profit. It is designed to meet the needs of the people in power.”

These businesses comprise the “medical-industrial complex” which has wrested power from physicians, turning healthcare into a commodity and patients into profit centers.   Although many uninsured and underinsured Americans receive too little care, the well-insured often get unnecessary, even risky care. More than two decades of studies by researchers at Dartmouth reveal that one-third of our healthcare dollars are squandered on useless tests and ineffective or unproven procedures no better than the less-costly ones they replace. The studies demonstrate that evidence-based, accountable care would be both more effective and less expensive. 

In Money-Driven Medicine frustrated doctors and outraged patients testify to the tragedies which can happen when profit trumps patients’ needs. Money-Driven Medicine will encourage health professionals and patients to work together to take control of American medicine back from the MBAs.

 

Study on Health Insurance Fraud

The George Washington University School of Public Health did a study about health insurance fraud.  Here are some interesting excerpts from the study:

In 2007, the U.S. spent nearly $2.3 trillion on health care and public and private insurers processed more than 4 billion health insurance claims.  The National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA) has estimated that, conservatively, 3% of all health care spending—or $68 billion—is lost to health care fraud. Other estimates by government and law enforcement agencies place fraud-related losses as high as 10% of annual health care spending; at this rate, the losses in 2007 alone –over $220 billion – would have been enough to cover the uninsured.

Medicare and Medicaid may be susceptible to fraud in part because many investigative reports on victims of consumer swindles suggest that financial fraud is not uniformly distributed across all households; instead, it disproportionately targets the elderly, women, minorities, the less educated, and the poor.  In other words, Medicare and Medicaid fraud may reflect the vulnerable nature of the populations that depend on the program rather than any failing on the part of either program.

Growth of health care spending

McKnight's had an article about health care spending.  The article states that Federal spending on nursing home and home health accelerated in 2007, even as overall healthcare spending grew at the slowest rate since 1998, according to a new spending report issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Freestanding nursing home spending expanded by 4.8% that year, compared with 4.0% in 2006. Meanwhile, spending for freestanding home healthcare services increased to 11.3%.   Overall healthcare spending climbed by 6.1% in 2007 to $2.2 trillion, or $7,421 per person. Total healthcare spending by public programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, grew 6.4% in 2007, a deceleration from 8.2% 2006.

One of the factors contributing to the overall slower growth in federal healthcare spending was a deceleration in prescription drug spending due to an increased use of generic medication. Retail prescription drug spending grew by 4.9% in 2007, compared with 8.6% growth in 2006, according to the report.

 

Poliakoff & Associates, P.A., is one of South Carolina’s most respected and distinguished law firms. The Poliakoff firm began nearly 60 years ago by three attorney brothers: Matthew, J. Manning, and Bernard. With a history of believing the justice system...More...