Seniors for Sale

The Seattle Times had a great article called "Seniors for Sale".  The article discusses the unfortunate plight of Nadra McSherry.   She needed an adult family home and settled on Narrows View Manor in Tacoma, owned by Arlie and Charlene Leno.   They relied on the fact that adult homes were licensed by the state Department of Social and Health Services. 

McSherry paid $3,500 a month for a bedroom, prepared meals and daily care delivered by a staff of aides.  McSherry's daughters had no clue that only weeks earlier, inspectors for DSHS had swept into the home and uncovered 14 safety and health violations. And they had no idea that Arlie Leno harbored a troubling past, one enabled by state regulators.

In 1990, Arlie Leno left his job as a nursing-home administrator and became his own boss, getting a state license to run a Tacoma boarding home with 16 adult residents. He called it Tule Lake Manor. Leno's residents ranged from the bed bound to those with late-stage Alzheimer's disease or Down syndrome. Despite his work experience, Leno got into trouble within a few months of opening Tule Lake Manor.

Inspectors for DSHS cited him for 18 violations including failing to properly train staff, notify family when a resident fell and broke a hip, and obtain medical care for a resident who fell and was injured.  Inspectors found that one staffer had lost her nurse's-aide license for "alcohol and drug issues"; another was on probation for a felony assault conviction and, by law, was not allowed to be alone with a vulnerable adult.

In 2000, DSHS revoked Leno's boarding-home license, citing a decade of abuse and neglect and evidence that residents had "suffered actual harm." Between 1990 and 2000, state inspectors had cited Leno with 135 violations.  He sold Tule Lake Manor for $422,000.

After Arlie Leno gave up his boarding home in 2000, he began taking a more active role at Narrows View.  After that, inspectors cited the home more often for violations including failing to train staff and to screen them for infectious diseases.

In 2002, they declared bankruptcy. They said they netted about $30,000 a year from their business but had $316,000 in mortgage and other debts, including $40,000 in delinquent federal taxes.

More violations piled up at Narrows View Manor: They failed to create a "care plan" for each resident. The care plan is a critical blueprint that tells staff exactly what care each resident requires: what medications to take and when, how often a resident has to be turned to avoid bedsores, what diet to follow, and so on.

Arlie Leno also hired a woman convicted of felony assault to care for the residents. By law, her conviction barred her from working there.

In July 2003, the couple separated and Charlene Leno, then 60, moved out. Their breakup created problems for Arlie Leno as well as for his residents. His wife was listed on the state license as the "provider," meaning she was the owner responsible for overseeing care.

Arlie Leno's solution was to lie repeatedly to inspectors about his wife's whereabouts. For nearly a year, state records show, he told DSHS investigators that his wife was away on vacation or visiting family.  DSHS officials finally discovered the deception.   Leno had lied at least four times so DSHS fined them a measly $400.

That same year, 2004, Arlie Leno sneaked an extra resident into Narrows View. By law, he was limited to six residents, but he added a seventh, apparently to squeeze out more profits.

During a DSHS inspection in July 2004, Leno told a staffer that he had only six residents, five female and one male. The inspector became suspicious when he spotted a second male resident walk out of the staff bedroom, and asked his identity.

In another case, a resident fell on the bathroom floor and broke her leg but the caregiver refused to call an ambulance. "We don't do that here," DSHS records recount the caregiver as saying. "We call the family to take them."   The injured woman's family wasn't called until nearly three hours after she fell, records show. 

Again, DSHS settled for modest fines.

All through this time, McSherry's daughters and other family members visited her nearly every day at Narrows View; daughter Janice McDonald, who worked at a hospital nearby, would stop in after work.  "One might wonder why we didn't see what was going on," Elaine Matsuda would later explain. "There are some things that are so subtle. And what Arlie Leno didn't want us to see is not going to happen while we're there."   The McSherry family knew nothing of Leno's serious violations.

In June 2006, McSherry developed a small bedsore on her tailbone. The daughters arranged for a registered nurse to visit the Leno home and treat her wound.   Once the wound had sufficiently healed, the nurse showed aides at Narrows View how to treat pressure sores. She told the staff to alert her or McSherry's doctor if the sore flared again.

Within two months, McSherry's pressure sore re-emerged, medical records show. But no one at the home recognized its danger and no one in McSherry's family was told about it, nor were her doctor or nurse. The wound remained untreated for more than a month. Aides did rub an ointment on it each day. But the ointment was not suitable for pressure sores. In fact, records show, the ointment made it worse.

After sitting for a month with a painful festering bedsore, she finally said, "My bottom hurts," McDonald recalled.  She undressed her mother, then gasped. "There was a quarter-size hole in the skin. It went to the bone," she said.

A nurse visiting Leno's home at the time examined McSherry's tailbone and was alarmed. It was the worst pressure sore she had seen in 20 years of practice, she later told DSHS investigators. It was a Stage IV ulcer, meaning it had eaten through her skin, muscles and connective tissue, down to the bone.

McSherry was rushed to the emergency room, then admitted to Allenmore Hospital. For nearly a month, doctors unleashed a medical arsenal against the raging infection and the pain. Nothing worked.  She died.

Dr. Richard Waltman, who signed her death certificate, said McSherry died of a heart attack brought on by infection from the bedsore. "It was too much for her body to handle," he said.

"My mother died a horrifically painful death. She weighed 80 pounds when she died. They were giving her morphine that would have knocked out a 400-pound football player," Matsuda said. "She still would scream and yell and cry out in pain and delirium from the medication."

DSHS determined that Leno's mistreatment of McSherry did not warrant revoking his license. It required him, for the first time, to post his violations publicly. And it did fine him $3,200: $100 for each of the 32 days that he failed to provide proper care to McSherry the price of one preventable death.

This infuriated Matsuda and her sisters. Since McSherry's death, DSHS found more serious violations at Leno's home. In May 2007, a female resident was found crawling in the middle of a four-lane street in a busy intersection. The woman, who had Alzheimer's disease, ended up in a nearby emergency room with a head wound.

Finally in May 2007, Janice Schurman, a DSHS supervisor, wrote to her superiors that field investigators felt Leno should lose his license.  Supervisors overruled her.   DSHS supervisors ultimately ruled in favor of Leno, who will be 83 years old this year.   He holds a dubious record: No adult-home owner has amassed as many serious violations as Leno has and still remained open for business.

McSherry's daughters were haunted by their mother's neglect.   Matsuda contacted Seattle attorney Anthony Shapiro, who determined that Arlie Leno had no major assets and did not carry liability insurance.  Shapiro embraced a novel strategy: He filed a civil suit against DSHS under the legal doctrine of "deliberate indifference." He had to prove that DSHS knew that a substantial risk to residents existed at Leno's adult family home and chose to ignore it.

"This was not the only incident in Narrows View's history where pressure ulcers and pressure sores cropped up among patients," Shapiro said. "They had a long history of people having pressure sores and DSHS knew about it and other than noting it, and coming in periodically, the practice at this home really never changed.

DSHS settled with McSherry's family late last year for $565,000. Leno, also named in the suit, reached a confidential settlement with the family.

A Times reporter telephoned a DSHS regional office and, as any member of the public can do, asked about the enforcement history at Arlie Leno's home.   A DSHS staffer mischaracterized the bulk of Leno's history of violations as minor infractions and "paperwork problems."

When she came to the 2006 violations regarding McSherry, the staffer noted that a resident had developed a "little pressure ulcer."  When asked if the woman died from neglect, the DSHS staffer consulted the enforcement computer once again.

Oh, no, she said. "It doesn't show anything about a death
 

Investigation into Ohio nursing homes

Ohio's Newsnet5.com had an article about their investigation into Ohio nursing homes.  Working with their partners at Scripps Howard News Service, NewsChannel5 spent three months researching care homes.   NewsChannel5 found poor ratings for a number of Cleveland-area nursing homes. In fact, a quarter of the facilities in Cuyahoga County rated just one star on Medicare's five-star scale. Five other ManorCare properties in the area garnered just one star.

"There should be two kinds of nursing homes the excellent and non existent," said Larry Minnix, chief executive officer of the American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging.

Long-term care ombudsman, Gerald Kasunic, said, "If you smell urine or feces, or what I call the chemical hidden smell, something that may be a serious chemical odor, those are kind of bad signs."

According the SHNS and WEWS study of death records maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 19,000 people died in area nursing homes in 2005 and 2006. Of those deaths, 651 people died of accidents, skin infections or other potentially avoidable causes.

 

New GAO Report on Underreporting of Violations

The Government Accountability Office issued a new report titled Addressing the Factors Underlying Understatement of Serious Care Problems Requires Sustained CMS and State Commitment.  Not surprisingly South Carolina is one of the worst offendersReducing understatement is critical to protecting the health and safety of vulnerable nursing home residents and ensuring the credibility of the survey process. Federal and state efforts will require a sustained, long-term commitment because understatement arises from weaknesses in several interrelated areas—including CMS’s survey process, surveyor workforce and training, supervisory review processes, and state agency practices and external pressure.

The conclusions reached include as follows:
Concerns about CMS’s Survey Process.
Survey methodology and guidance are integral to reliable and consistent state nursing home surveys, and we found that weaknesses in these areas were linked to understatement by both surveyors and state agency directors. Both groups reported struggling to interpret existing guidance, and differences in interpretation were linked to understatement, especially in determining what constitutes actual harm. Surveyors noted that the current survey guidance was too lengthy, complex, and subjective. Additionally, they had fewer concerns about care areas for which CMS has issued revised interpretive protocols.

Ongoing Workforce and Surveyor Training Challenges. Workforce shortages in state survey agencies increase the need for high-quality initial and ongoing training for surveyors. Currently, high vacancy rates can place pressure on state surveyors to complete surveys under difficult circumstances, including compressed time frames, inadequately staffed survey teams, and too many inexperienced surveyors. States are responsible for hiring and retaining surveyors and have grappled with pervasive and intractable workforce shortages. State agency directors struggling with these workforce issues reported the need for more readily accessible training for both their new and experienced surveyors that did not involve travel to a central location. Nearly 30 percent of surveyors in high-understatement states stated that initial surveyor training, which is primarily a state activity that incorporates two CMS on-line computer courses and a 1-week federal basic training course culminating in the SMQT, was not adequate to identify deficiencies and cite them at the appropriate scope and severity level. State agency directors reported that workforce shortages also impede states’ ability to provide ongoing training opportunities for experienced staff and that additional CMS online training and electronic training media would help states maintain an experienced, well-informed workforce.

Supervisory Review Limitations.
Currently, CMS provides little guidance on how states should structure supervisory review processes, leaving the scope of this important quality-assurance tool exclusively to the states and resulting in considerable variation throughout the nation in how these processes are structured. We believe that state quality assurance processes are a more effective preventive measure against understatement because they have the potential to be more immediate and cover more surveys than the limited number of federal comparative surveys conducted in each state. However, compared to reviews of serious deficiencies, states conducted relatively fewer reviews of deficiencies at the D through F level, those that were most frequently understated throughout the nation, to assess whether or not such deficiencies were cited at too low a scope and severity level.  In addition, we found that frequent changes to survey results made during supervisory review were symptomatic of workforce shortages and survey methodology weaknesses.

State Agency Practices and External Pressure In a few states, noncitation practices, challenging relationships with the industry or legislators, or unbalanced IDR processes—those that surveyors regard as favoring nursing home operators over resident welfare—may have had a negative effect on survey quality and resulted in the citation of fewer nursing home deficiencies than was warranted.  In one state, both the state agency director and over 40 percent of surveyors acknowledged the existence of a noncitation practice such as allowing a home to correct a deficiency without receiving a citation.  Forty percent of surveyors in four other states also responded on our questionnaire that noncitation practices existed.   Twelve state agency directors reported on our questionnaire experiencing some kind of external pressure. For example, in one state a legislator attended a survey and questioned surveyors as to whether state agency executives were coercing them to find deficiencies. Under such circumstances, it is difficult to know if the affected surveyors are consistently enforcing federal standards and reporting all deficiencies at the appropriate scope and severity levels. States’ differing experiences regarding the enforcement of federal standards and collaboration with their CMS regional offices in the face of significant external pressure also may confuse or undermine a thorough and independent survey process. If surveyors believe that CMS does not fully or consistently support the enforcement of federal standards, these surveyors may choose to avoid citing deficiencies that they perceive may trigger a reaction from external stakeholders. In addition, deficiency determinations may be influenced when IDR processes are perceived to favor nursing home operators over resident welfare.

Recommended Action includes:

Make sure that action is taken to address concerns identified with the new QIS methodology, such as ensuring that it accurately identifies potential quality problems; and clarify and revise existing CMS written guidance to make it more concise, simplify its application in the field, and reduce confusion, particularly on the definition of actual harm.

To address surveyor workforce shortages and insufficient training, we recommend that the Administrator of CMS take the following two actions: (1)  consider establishing a pool of additional national surveyors that could augment state survey teams or identify other approaches to help states experiencing workforce shortages; and (2) evaluate the current training programs and division of responsibility between federal and state components to determine the most cost-effective approach to: (1) providing initial surveyor training to new surveyors, and (2) supporting the continuing education of experienced surveyors.

To address inconsistencies in state supervisory reviews, we recommend that the Administrator of CMS take the following action:
Set an expectation through guidance that states have a supervisory review program as a part of their quality-assurance processes that includes routine reviews of deficiencies at the level of potential for more than minimal harm (D-F) and that provides feedback to surveyors regarding changes made to citations.

To address state agency practices and external pressure that may compromise survey accuracy, we recommend that the Administrator of CMS take the following two actions: (1)  reestablish expectations through guidance to state survey agencies that noncitation practices—official or unofficial—are inappropriate, and systematically monitor trends in states’ citations; and (2) establish expectations through guidance to state survey agencies to communicate and collaborate with their CMS regional offices when they experience significant pressure from legislators or the nursing home industry that may affect the survey process or surveyors’ perceptions

Fines reduced for abuse and neglect

Florida's State Journal Register ran an article about Golden Moments Senior Care Center in Jacksonville that was fined only $20,000 after one of its nurse's aides terrorized several elderly and sick residents.  The nursing home agreed to pay a reduced fine.  Golden Moments and the Illinois Department of Public Health worked out a deal in which the 113-bed facility will pay a $6,500 fine connected with the nurse's aide's conduct, said department spokeswoman Melaney Arnold.

The complaint said Golden Moments nurse's aide Jessie L. Ross "displayed a pattern of abusive behavior toward residents". That behavior included telling a resident to "go to hell," slapping the resident and depriving the resident of soda and snacks. Ross slapped a different resident, threatened to slit his throat, kicked the resident and held the resident's hands against his chest. Ross also allegedly hid another resident's nail polish and slapped that resident across the face. 

A state inspection report indicated residents had been complaining to staff members about the aide's conduct for weeks, and that several staff members observed, knew about or suspected physical and mental abuse was going on but failed to report the situation to their superiors.  Ross, who told Public Health officials she was training to become a nurse, is fighting the discipline, which hasn't been finalized.

"I find the decision to reduce the fine against Golden Moments for the abuse of residents to be incomprehensible," said Jamie Freschi, regional long-term care ombudsman who works for Springfield's "I CARE" social service agency. "The system has a responsibility to look out for the safety of the residents, not the interests of the facilities."

Officials from the state and federal governments are considering new fines against Golden Moments Senior Care Center after the Oct. 3 death of a 74-year-old resident who choked on food.   A Springfield-based advocate for nursing home residents said she was appalled by the fine reduction and noted that central Illinois nursing homes charge $4,000 to $5,000 a month for the care of one resident.

Golden Moments resident Adam Waelz was pronounced dead Oct. 3 after choking on food provided by the nursing home, Morgan County Coroner Jeff Lair said.   According to a state inspection report, Waelz, who was developmentally disabled, was known to be at risk of choking and often ate or drank too fast and should have been closely supervised while in the dining room.

The day of his death, Waelz, who had no teeth, should have received ham that was ground up, but he instead received ham that had been torn into pieces, according to the report. Lair's death investigation found ham pieces and mashed potatoes from Waelz's mouth lying next to his body. An autopsy revealed a wad of ham pieces the "size of a tangerine" in his windpipe, according to the state report.

Other problems described in the report included failure to keep residents clean, failure to prevent new bed sores from developing on several residents, and failure to provide activities for residents housed in an Alzheimer's unit.

 

Star-Tribune Series on Falls Part 3

The third part in the series based on the Star-Tribune's excellent investigation into falls in nursing homes deals with prevention.  The key to prevention is proper staffing and training.  Inadequate staffing is a common complaint from nursing home workers, industry watchers and families with loved ones in nursing homes. More than 1,000 Minnesotans suffered fall-related deaths in nursing homes from 2002 through 2008, according to a Star Tribune analysis of death certificates.

Every night, after pulling on her scrubs and heading to work for the night shift, the nursing home aide would start to feel tense. Frail people's lives would soon be in her hands. Call lights would blink. Alarms would beep. Sometimes she felt too rushed to care for everyone properly.

"If there's one alarm going off in one hall and there's another one going off in the other hall in the other direction, which one do you go to first?" she said. "One of them you're going to save from falling. The other one is going to fall."

"I think it's really related to the inadequate staffing. Totally related. And, you know, the damage is untold," said Charlene Harrington, a professor emeritus of sociology and nursing at the University of California, San Francisco. She has done numerous studies on nursing home staffing. Though state and federal staffing standards are not precisely defined, 75 percent of Minnesota nursing homes reporting data are understaffed by one federal measure.

In interviews with the Star Tribune, 16 nurses aides at some homes with more than 10 fall-related deaths from 2002 through 2008 frequently complained of insufficient staffing. They requested anonymity, fearing for their ability to get jobs in the industry. The former night shift aide, who once worked at two metro area nursing homes, said it sometimes felt like chaos, even at 2 a.m.

Nurses aides help nursing home residents do the routine things others take for granted: Get out of bed, go to the bathroom, walk, eat.  Nursing homes have struggled to find good workers in the past, although the recession has widened the pool of candidates recently.  The average hourly wage for a nurses aide in Minnesota is $12.86, according to the state Department of Employment and Economic Development.

The impact of staffing can be profound. At St. Anthony Health Center, a frequent visitor told state inspectors doing a routine survey that she saw residents sit unattended for long periods, get out of chairs on their own and get agitated waiting for help to the bathroom. One nurses aide said she was concerned about residents' safety. Another said it was sometimes difficult to get to beeping alarms when they're busy with other residents. The survey the home for insufficient staffing, at the same time noting multiple falls.

The biggest roadblock to more staffing, by all accounts: greed for profits.

Nursing home care is already too expensive. The homes receive from $3,000 to almost $9,000 a month per resident in Minnesota, according to the state Department of Human Services. The average monthly cost is $4,858. About $1.35 billion was spent on nursing home care in Minnesota in 2007, according to the department. Medical Assistance paid for $813 million in fiscal year 2008.

At a minimum, Minnesota requires that homes provide two hours of nursing care per resident per day. Federal regulations say a nurse must be on duty 24 hours a day. Both say homes must have "a sufficient number of qualified nursing personnel on duty" to meet residents' needs, but give no number or ratio.

The federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regulates nursing homes nationally and contracts with states to enforce the regulations. It calculates expected staffing levels for each nursing home, taking into account the severity of their residents' needs and time needed to care for them. Using those expected staffing levels, 278 of 371 Minnesota nursing homes are understaffed.

One federal study in 2001 found a high staffing ratio helps only to a point. For long-term residents, it found, staffing above 4.08 hours of care per resident each day didn't improve quality of care.

Little Sisters of the Poor nursing home in St. Paul is one of about 90 nursing homes in the state that has higher staffing than CMS expected.  Sister Theresa Robertson, the nursing home's administrator, said she believes there is a correlation between staffing and falls.  Higher staffing means residents can be watched more closely, she said. That may help the staff figure out when residents are acting differently and understand ways to help them and prevent falls, she and other administrators said.

Nursing home resident Jim Grant, who once lived at Rose of Sharon Manor in Roseville, said it took too long to get a response when he turned on his call light. Grant, a 73-year-old stroke victim, said that once when he needed to go to the bathroom, he got up by himself and fell and cracked bones in his right leg about a year ago.

There are no uniform regulations for timeliness in answering call lights. As Grant sat in his cramped room at Rose of Sharon, his bed surrounded by family photos and knickknacks, a woman down the hall bellowed in a hoarse voice, "I have to go to the bathroom! ... I've got to go. I've got to go ... I've got to go now." "She's got to go bad," Grant said. He noted that yelling to get a staff member's attention wasn't uncommon.

State health investigators and regulators rarely issue citations for staffing levels, data shows.  But nurses aides know that, even if they're working short-staffed, they're often the ones who take the blame for falls. In about 60 cases where records showed what happened to the nurses aide, homes fired aides about half the time. In 18 cases, homes issued suspensions or warnings or retrained the aides. In 11 instances, nurses aides quit.

One former nurses aide at Crest View Lutheran Home in Columbia Heights said she got frustrated by staffing levels when she worked there in 2007. She and other former Crest View workers described a lack of teamwork. At 4:30 on a Sunday afternoon this summer, the Crest View dining room came alive as staff members in colorful scrubs helped residents to dinner using wheelchairs, walkers and belts. One hallway was nearly deserted, except for one resident who talked on the phone in her room, another resident who sat near a room window, and a third who quietly ambled down the corridor. Throughout the hallway, a beep echoed repeatedly. There were no staff members in sight. The nurse's station sat empty. Crest View, which had at least 13 fall-related deaths from 2002 through 2008, was cited for insufficient staffing early this year as part of regular nursing home surveys.

 

Star-Tribune Fall Investigation Part 1

As discussed yesterday, here is an edited part one of the series of articles in the Star-Tribune about fatal falls in nursing homes.  There were 1,000 Minnesotans whose deaths were related to falls in nursing homes from 2002 through 2008, according to a Star Tribune analysis of death certificates. On average, one nursing home resident in the state dies every two days in circumstances stemming from a fall.  Less than 10 percent of fall-related deaths in nursing homes are fully investigated by the Minnesota Department of Health, which is charged with monitoring nursing home care.  Even when regulators discover that negligence or neglect caused the fall and death, they often do not cite nursing homes for violations of state and federal regulations.

Minnesotans in nursing homes fell after aides left them alone on toilets. They fell while being improperly  transferred -- such as from a bed to a wheelchair -- by one aide when two were needed. They fell when aides misused equipment for moving them and dropped them in the process.

Some died quickly, their fragile neck bones snapped or their aging bodies overwhelmed by internal bleeding caused by the fall and compounded by blood-thinning drugs. Others -- often still enjoying some quality of life -- were suddenly bed-ridden in excruciating pain from broken bones.  After a fall, a spiral of decline often begins in the elderly. Weakened by the ordeal, victims succumb to pneumonia or see their chronic health conditions erupt with a vengeance. The fall, medical experts say, sets off a deadly systemic chain reaction, hastening the end of life. 

More than a dozen former nursing aides who worked at Minnesota nursing homes that have had fall-related deaths cited staffing problems as a concern. By at least one federal measure, 75 percent of Minnesota nursing homes are understaffed, although both state and federal staffing standards are vague.

Advocates for the elderly say if more of the deaths related to falls were subject to a more rigorous regulatory microscope, it would reveal both overburdened staffs and mismanagement.

During its investigation at Crest View, the state found problems with falls there. In a single month -- April 2005 -- there were 48 falls involving 33 residents at the facility, the report shows. Although the facility "identified a concern" with an increased number of falls, it didn't revise its fall-prevention program, the report said. The state cited Crest View for flawed care, concluding that it violated three federal regulations. Under standard procedure, Crest View was given time to correct the deficiencies and avoid punishment.   Regulators took no further action.

But over the past few years, some nursing homes have launched fall-reduction efforts, using sophisticated equipment to pinpoint balance and gait weaknesses, providing strength training and beefing up internal investigations. Over the past two decades, changes in laws and a shift in nursing home philosophy aimed at increasing profits

Under federal rules, every nursing home resident must be assessed for fall risk. Over the past two years, small consortiums of Minnesota nursing homes have made fall-prevention a priority. Under a state incentive program, some get extra payments to improve their performance. One group, Empira, received $4.2 million last year for 16 participating nursing homes.  Part of Empira's strategy is changing how the homes try to prevent falls. Some homes are improving their investigations into what causes a particular resident to fall. A few turn to technology: St. Therese Home in New Hope bought expensive diagnostic equipment to pinpoint weaknesses when residents sit, stand and move.

At St. Therese, in the midst of a heightened effort to prevent falls, a paralyzed, high-profile resident died after he was dropped as two nursing aides moved him from a wheelchair to bed last spring.

The Rev. Tim Vakoc, a 49-year-old Roman Catholic priest and Army chaplain, had suffered a devastating head injury in 2004 from a roadside bomb in Iraq.  On June 20, he died after falling to the floor and injuring his head, a state report determined. The state's investigation found no neglect by St. Therese nursing home, but blamed the two nursing assistants, saying they gave "incongruous" explanations of what happened as they tried to move Vakoc using an EZ Lift device.  Since 2004, at least 17 nursing home residents died or were injured across the state after being dropped from lifts.

Jeanette Lashinski doubts she ever would have filed a complaint about her mother's fall-related death in 2006. But her sister-in law, who worked in nursing home business offices much of her career, decided it was important to pursue. Lashinski's mother, Alice Kalas, was active into her late 70s, going dancing three times a week.   With arthritis and dementia, Kalas went to live at the Camilia Rose Care Center in Coon Rapids in early 2005. Nearly a year later, a nursing aide helped her to the bathroom and left her unattended. As the aide returned, she heard a crash and saw Kalas on the floor, head down. An X-ray scan showed her neck was broken. Kalas, 81, developed pneumonia and died 20 days later.

A state probe faulted the nursing home. The home failed to provide "supervision, assistance and on-going interventions" to reduce her risk, the state found. The state cited the nursing home for failing to prevent the accident. No fines were issued.  An alarm the staff had put on Kalas was removed with family'agreement because it agitated Kalas. Once it was removed, charts didn't list her as a fall risk anymore, and the staff thought it was safe to leave her alone in the bathroom.

Tania Rubin, 93, survived the Nazi advance in the Soviet Union, but a fall at Texas Terrace Care Center in St. Louis Park made her last days painful, her family said.  Early one morning, the staff found Rubin bleeding after hitting her face on an oxygen tank near her bed. She died a week later.  A hospital report after the fall said Rubin was suffering and dying, her chronic medical conditions no longer treatable. It is unclear whether a complaint was ever made to the state. A death certificate shows Rubin died of congestive heart failure, aortic stenosis and other natural causes. It does not mention her fall.

 

 

 

Great report about falls in Star-Tribune

The Star-Tribune had a series of articles based on their investigation into nursing home sin Minnesota.  Although the series concentrates on records from one state, it is persuasive as to what is going on nationally.  The first article "When Death comes without Dignity" discusses the investigation itself.

A Star Tribune report documents a troubling pattern in nursing homes based on death certificates.  They looked for patterns that might lead to a story, such as drug overdoses or medical errors. The death certificates noticed a number of deaths related to falls by patients in nursing homes.  More than 1,000 deaths related to falls in Minnesota nursing homes over the six-year period.

"As we worked on these stories these last several months, editors and reporters would literally shudder at some of the examples we had uncovered. Our minds would quickly flash forward to what would be in store for us when we grew old. Does anyone want to imagine being 90 years old, alone at night in a nursing home, struggling to get to the bathroom when no one is around to help?"

The Star-Tribune staff spent several months tracking down the families of those who had died from falls, exploring the conditions that led to an individual death, and talking to nursing homes in the hopes of explaining why so many of the elderly die in such a painful manner. One thing that became clear was how quickly the stability of a nursing home resident can change, "how one little incident can lead to the end."

The reporters also discovered some clear trouble spots: Reporters talked to nursing home aides who were at wit's end trying to keep up with the needs of their patients; to children who couldn't get a straight answer about how their parents had died, and to nursing home advocates who asked whether we just wanted them to tie up old people to make sure they don't hurt themselves. (Of
course not.)   The nursing homes' internal investigations are private, and the state does not require a complete review of every death by fall.

I will blog the next couple of days regarding this series of articles.

 



 

$54 million verdict in rape case

 Louisville Courier-Journal had an article about the recent jury verdict against ResCare Inc. A jury in Albuquerque, N.M., returned a damage award of about $54 million against ResCare Inc. over the rape of a disabled male resident in one of the company’s group homes.  After a three-week trial, the jury unanimously found ResCare negligent, Bettinger said. The company was ordered to pay nearly $5 million in actual damages and more than $49 million in punitive damages.

Carl Bettinger, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said the incident occurred a few weeks after ResCare fired nine of the 12 employees of its group home in Roswell, N.M., because they failed or refused drug testing. Bettinger said in an interview that ResCare’s now-defunct New Mexico subsidiary “scrambled” to hire new staff for the home. One of the new hires had been fired from his last job, where he had been found kissing a male resident, Bettinger said. ResCare didn’t call that employer to check on the new worker before hiring him.

The man worked one night at the ResCare facility. That was the night the resident was abused, Bettinger said.  No eyewitnesses came forward.  Physical evidence was lost when the resident was showered the next day.

The award surpasses the $36.6 million profit earned in all of last year by ResCare, one of the nation’s largest providers of residential care to persons with disabilities.


 

S.C. SLED Vulnerable Adults Investigative Unit

The Sun News had an article about the SLED unit called Vulnerable Adults Investigative Unit that is responsible for investigating abuse and neglect of vulnerable adults but only in state-run facilities.  For some unknown reason, they do not investigate incidents in private for profit nursing homes.  SLED investigates deaths and complaints about abuse at state-run facilities, such as those operated by the state Department of Mental Health. Call 866-200-6066. 

The lieutenant governor's office on Aging/Long Term Care ombudsman has the duty to investigate all other residential facilities, including private nursing homes and assisted living centers, but they hardly ever do and do not have the necessary resources. Call 800-868-9095.

The S.C. Department of Social Services investigates abuse or neglect of vulnerable adults in private or foster care homes. Call 803-898-7318. S.C.

Attorney General's Medicaid Fraud Control Unit investigates misuse of Medicaid funds. Call 888-662-4328.

Last November, Dwayne Walls was living in the Alzheimer's wing at Veterans' Victory House, a state-owned nursing home in Walterboro, when another patient beat him unconscious with a cane. Walls died a week later.   Despite the beating, the Colleton County coroner ruled that Walls, 76, died of natural causes. But the death also triggered an investigation by the state Law Enforcement Divisions Vulnerable Adults Investigative Unit.

In place for two years, the unit was created to investigate abuse, neglect, exploitation and deaths in government nursing homes, such as Veterans Victory House.   So far the unit has received more than 2,500 reports and complaints.  "A patient might be 105, but maybe he wasn't supposed to die that day," said Matt Brown, a SLED agent who works in the unit. "He has the same right to live as 5-year-olds with their whole lives ahead of them."

Lawmakers established the unit in 2007 after a nonprofit group, Protection and Advocacy for People with Disabilities, issued a report that showed the departments of Mental Health and Disabilities and Special Needs had long ignored or covered up abuse cases. The new unit is a more neutral investigative body for these agencies, said SLED Capt. Patsy Lightle, who runs the Vulnerable Adults Investigative Unit and a separate one that investigates child deaths.

One of the unit's responsibilities is to investigate suspicious deaths at state-run facilities. In the unit's first two years, agents received reports about 725 deaths.

 

The fox is guarding the henhouse!

The DesMoines Register had one of the most disturbing articles I have ever read.  Daniel Larmore is the chairman of the board that oversees Iowa's nursing home administrators.  That board is charged with licensing and disciplining Iowa's nursing home administrators — but it has taken no action against an administrator in two years.   He characterized the sexual abuse of a resident in his facility as a "meaningful" relationship that caused no harm to the resident.  How dare he say such an irresponsible thing.  Who the heck does he think he is.

Larmore was the administrator at the Harmony House care center in Waterloo.  State records show that Larmore himself faced allegations from the state inspectors in 2004 — and was never investigated or disciplined by the board.  The incident resulted in a $3,500 fine against the facility, a detailed report of the inspectors' findings should have been sent to the Iowa Department of Public Health, which would have passed the information on to the board for its review.  It is unclear whether Larmore's case was ever sent to the board for consideration. But Larmore has also acknowledged to the Register that the board failed to review some cases that were sent to the board for potential disciplinary action.

In June 2004, the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals alleged that Larmore failed to properly investigate and respond to complaints that a female nurse aide had repeatedly engaged in sex with a brain-injured, 29-year-old male resident of the home. The aide's co-workers had witnessed several suspicious encounters between the resident and the aide, and had reported their concerns to supervisors. At one point, the resident's roommate complained, saying the two seemed to be having sex on the other side of a privacy curtain.

State inspectors accused Larmore of making little effort to investigate the matter when an employee first voiced her suspicions. The state also alleged he failed to separate the resident and the aide once the complaints were made. The aide finally confessed to having sex with the resident.   In a written response to the state's allegations, Larmore argued that sex between the caregiver and the resident did not cause injury or harm to the resident.  The resident had a brain injury and clearly could not have given consent.

Larmore wrote: "The relationship was initiated by, and was meaningful to, (the resident). ... The presented situation was one of mutual interest of a (resident) and a caregiver and, although inappropriate, did not present potential or actual harm to the consumer due to the reciprocal fond relationship."

In Iowa, a professional caregiver who engages in sex with a nursing home resident can be criminally charged with dependent-adult abuse. Larmore acknowledged in his response to the state that after the first concerns were voiced about intimate or inappropriate contact between the resident and the aide, he didn't talk to other employees or to the victim. In May, before Larmore resigned as Harmony House administrator, he fired nurse aide Tina Turner, 29, for allegedly having sex with a resident of the home and providing the man with marijuana.

Turner denied the allegation. One of her co-workers alleged Turner confessed to disconnecting the man from his ventilator so he could inhale the drug, saying, "I didn't want to kill him or anything. I just wanted to get the dude high."
 

So this SOB covers up the sexaul assault of a brain damaged resident and fails to properly investigate of prevent it and he gets rewarded by becoming the chairman of the group that investigates Administrators?  Are you kidding me?
 

Poliakoff & Associates, P.A., is one of South Carolina’s most respected and distinguished law firms. The Poliakoff firm began nearlyMore...