Star-Tribune Series Part 2

The second part of the Star-Tribune's investigation into fatal falls at nursing homes concentrate on the lack of sanctions.  Seventeen days after Agnes Johnson died, state investigators drove out to the White Community Hospital and Nursing Home to interview the staff.  An aide told them she had turned away momentarily while using a mechanical lift to maneuver Johnson from her bed to a wheelchair, and Johnson slipped from the device's sling to the floor, breaking her shoulder and thigh. The OHFC concluded that she died from neglect. It concluded that the aide violated the home's guidelines requiring two people to perform lifts, according to a report. It also determined the nursing home had not properly trained the aide to use the lift.  Despite the mistakes and Johnson's death, the OHFC did not cite the nursing home for violating state and federal regulations. The state found neglect in 17 cases statewide since 2004 where residents were seriously injured or died after falling out of lifts. It has issued citations for errors in only three cases.

When a Minnesota investigation finds that a nursing home was at fault, regulators require nothing more of the nursing home if it fired the worker involved or developed a corrective plan before investigators arrived. Minnesota rarely issues fines against nursing homes.  That is why some health care advocates question the OHFC's effectiveness in holding nursing homes accountable for abuse and neglect -- including falls.  They question a regulatory approach in which more than 1,000 Minnesota deaths were attributed to falls in nursing homes from 2002 through 2008, but the OHFC fully investigated only about 75 of those.

Federal officials audit the OHFC's process for evaluating reports of all types of incidents -- including falls -- and triaging them for possible investigation.  In the past two years, the OHFC has not met federal standards in how it selects cases to investigate.  Last year, federal auditors said that in a sample of complaints, OHFC triaged only 60 percent correctly.

In one of the sampled cases, the OHFC declined to do an on-site investigation into whether a nursing home was using mechanical lifts correctly and if the facility was following physician orders for medical checkups after injury. The auditors said the case should have been given the highest possible priority because other residents who were being moved with lifts were at risk.

But Minnesota's practice of not routinely issuing citations has a drawback, she acknowledged. To help consumers shop for nursing homes, the federal government developed a five-star quality rating that uses the number of citations issued against each home as part of the rating. That means that some substantiated cases of neglect are not reflected in the ratings for Minnesota homes.

In 2005, two nurses aides at Viewcrest Health Center were using a mechanical lift to move a resident from a wheelchair to bed. Without warning, the sling tore and the elderly woman fell to the floor.  The fall left her in great pain and her overall condition deteriorated. Six days later, she died. OHFC investigators discovered that Viewcrest was using a sling that had been patched to fix a broken strap, despite the manufacturer's recommendation to discard and not repair damaged slings. Despite the harm to the resident, the OHFC did not cite Viewcrest for violating government rules.

Viewcrest was found at fault in 2006, when the OHFC ruled that the nursing home didn't properly care for a resident, a known falls risk, who fell and broke her neck. The OHFC did issue citations in that case. Two years later, in 2008, the OHFC again cited Viewcrest because it didn't develop a care plan to help a resident who had fallen 11 times. But in the same year, the OHFC determined Viewcrest was at fault when a resident rolled off a bed and broke her leg while being cared for by a nurses aide. The state regulators said the facility did a poor job training the aide to care for the resident. No citations were issued. Then, in 2009, there was another fall-related incident at Viewcrest. The staff left a resident, who was at risk for falls, alone in his wheelchair and did not activate an alarm that would have sounded as he fell and cut his head. For a third time in four years, the OHFC declined to issue citations for mistakes the home made that resulted in falls.

Helen Fellerman, 93, had a rare disease that made her particularly prone to bleeding. She was also unsteady, forgetful and had a history of falls. So alarms were attached to her bed and wheelchair at Stillwater Good Samaritan Center so staff members would know when she was on the move. But when Fellerman tumbled from her wheelchair on the night of Aug. 31, 2005, the alarm did not go off, an OHFC report noted. She had been left alone for about 30 minutes. She died three days later. The fall had caused bleeding inside her skull, made worse by her medical condition.

 

 

 

Should fines be limited to $10,000?

The State Journal-Register had an interesting article about how Illinois is challenging a decision by a Sangamon County Judge Zappa that puts a $10,000 limit on nursing home fines, but the ruling already has affected dozens of cases statewide.  Zappa issued his ruling in a case involving Peoria’s Rosewood Care Center, which had appealed a $25,000 fine stemming from the death of 95-year-old Katherine Martin in 2006.  Zappa found that the department violated state law and bypassed administrative rules when it began to impose fines of more than $10,000 several years ago. He barred the department from enforcing fines of more than $10,000 in past cases that remained pending and any future cases.

Public Health officials believe state law allowed them to boost fines to $50,000 whenever they determined that bad care directly caused a resident’s death. The department in 2006 also began issuing fines of at least $20,000 when residents sustained serious injuries connected with bad care.  High fines rightly punish and deter bad behavior, and promote better care.

Fines involving 40 Illinois nursing homes have been reduced, with the facilities agreeing to pay $10,000 or less, since the Feb. 13 decision.  I bet the facilities jumped at the chance to pay less than $10,000.   State officials are considering reducing individual fines that exceed $10,000 in more than 80 other cases going back to 2006.

The Department of Public Health hasn’t decided yet how to proceed in a pending case against Woodstock Residence, now known as Crossroads Care Center, in which the Woodstock nursing home was fined $300,000 — a record level — in May 2008. State regulators have investigated five suspicious deaths there, as well as a former employee who allegedly used drug cocktails on residents.

The article cited a few examples of cases in which fines against nursing homes have been reduced to $10,000 by the Illinois Department of Public Health because of Sangamon County Judge Leo Zappa’s order in February. These cases remain pending, and a final amount to be paid hasn’t been negotiated:

* Maryville Manor, Maryville: Original fine was $40,000, stemming from an Aug. 6, 2007, inspection that detailed a range of problems including multiple bedsores and pressure sores on residents, a lack of recreational activities and a situation in which a nurse’s aide resigned after injectable anti-anxiety medicine prescribed for a resident was found in the aide’s possession.

* Evergreen Nursing and Rehab Center, Effingham: Original fine was $25,000, stemming from a March 22, 2006, investigation into the June 22, 2005, death of an 84-year-old resident who suffocated after becoming caught in a bedrail that had a piece missing.

* Dearborn Court, Kankakee: Original fine was $30,000, stemming from a Sept. 4, 2007, investigation into the alleged physical assault of a 64-year-old female resident by two employees of the nursing home on Aug. 15, 2007. The employees allegedly hit the resident with plastic hangers, tied her up with a belt, punched her in the head and stomach and tried to choke her.

* Peachtree Estates, Jonesboro: Original fine was $20,000, stemming from a July 15, 2008, inspection that said the facility failed to obtain prompt medical attention for a 73-year-old female resident who fell and sustained a head injury June 19, 2008. About a month before that injury, the resident had fallen and broken her left arm; she also fell on June 20, 2008.

 

SCDHEC Administrative Orders and Sanctions

Admissions suspended at Life Care Center of Red Bank

Our firm has a case against Life Care Centers of America for a facility that they operate in Hilton Head, S.C.  I was doing some research about Life Care Centers and ran across this article in the Chattanoogan.com about Tennesse suspending admissions in one of their facilities.

The article states that Tennessee Department of Health Commissioner Susan R. Cooper, MSN, RN, has suspended new admissions of residents to Life Care Center of Red Bank nursing home effective June 17, 2009, and imposed a one-time state civil monetary penalty of $5,000. A federal civil penalty has been imposed at $6,150 a day until the violations are corrected. A special monitor has been appointed to review the facility's operations.

Life Care Center of Red Bank was ordered not to admit any new residents based on conditions found during a complaint investigation and annual survey conducted May 26 through June 9.  During the survey, surveyors found violations of the following standards: administration, performance improvement, physician services, nursing services, medical records, and pharmaceutical services.

 

Lack of staffing led to death and cover up

Tony Bartelme of The Post and Courier had a great article about Alzheimer's, violence, and a cover up in nursing homes using the story of Dwayne Walls. It is a tragic story and clearly preventable.  Below is a short summary of the article.  Dwayne Walls was a resident of Veterans' Victory House, a large nursing home near Walterboro, who suffered Alzheimer's.  One day, they moved Walls to another room and put a dangerously psychotic patient in his old one. His wife warned nurses that Walls would try to return to his old room. "They said they were going to really watch him. But at midnight, I got a call that he had gone to his room and gotten beaten to a pulp," she said.

One night Walls went into another patient's room and climbed in an empty bed. Moments later, another patient walked in. He was 88 years old and also had dementia.  A nursing aide saw the man hitting Walls with his cane. Walls was on the floor, bleeding and unconscious.  An ambulance took Walls to the emergency room and phoned Walls' wife, Judy Hand. That night and over the next four days, they told her that Walls had merely fallen; they didn't mention the beating. Walls spent the next week in bed, and Hand was at his side when he died.   The nursing home's doctor later would write in Walls' file that his patient had contracted fatal pneumonia after becoming "immobile," but that the beating didn't account for this immobility.

In December 2006, investigators with the U.S. Department of Justice visited the facility: Staff gave patients wrong foods and medications and too often used physical restraints to control behavior problems. They found that the facility was poorly equipped to handle combative Alzheimer's patients.

"There appears to be no formal behavior program for residents diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, placing residents at heightened risk for the use of physical or chemical restraints to control behavior, and placing them at heightened risk of physical assault by other residents who may become frustrated at their repetitive speech or wandering," investigators concluded.

The state Department of Mental Health owns the facility but has a contract with a private company called Advantage Veterans Services of Walterboro to run it. The company is affiliated with HMR Advantage Health Systems, which is based in Easley and operates 26 nursing homes in South Carolina and elsewhere in the Southeast.

Nearly 80,000 people in South Carolina have Alzheimer's, enough to fill the University of South Carolina's Williams-Brice Stadium, and that memory loss isn't the disease's only troubling effect: More than two-thirds will exhibit some form of agitation or combative behavior.  Aggressive behavior is a normal part of the brain's breakdown, nursing homes don't hire enough people to meet the needs of these patients. Many blacklist Alzheimer's and dementia patients with histories of aggression, leaving already stressed families and loved ones with few options.

There is no cure for Alzheimer's, but doctors are zeroing in on its causes. One leading theory involves proteins. Healthy people have stringlike proteins in their brain cells that normally curl like unfurled ribbons. These ribbons help nourish the cells. But in Alzheimer's patients, these ribbons get tangled, destroying the cells in the process, along with a person's memories and functions that control behavior.

 As happens with about 70 percent of Alzheimer's patients, Walls grew more agitated as the disease marched through his brain, though he was by no means the only person in the wing suffering these effects.  In 2008, staff at the Veterans' Victory House documented in his medical records how another resident pushed him to the floor one month, and how a month later Walls hit another resident in the head with his fist. In June 2008, a resident hit another, who fell into Walls and knocked him to the floor. In July, a staff member found Walls in another resident's bed, his fists balled.   By August, a month before Walls' death, staff noted that he was "aggressive to others and himself," particularly when he was scared. But then the storm clouds cleared. Staff noted on the day Walls was beaten that he had no behavior problems and was moving around well.

Walls had fallen and needed to go to the hospital for X-rays, a nurse said. She didn't mention the beating, or that a deputy had been called to investigate.  Hand drove to Walterboro the next Monday morning for a visit. "I walked into the room and gasped. He was black and blue all over, swollen and on oxygen. I ran out of the room and got a nurse. They came and I asked what had happened." Dwayne had fallen, they told her. Throughout the day, the home's employees stopped by to visit Walls to see how he was doing.  Later that afternoon, four days after the attack, she approached a staffer. "I said, 'He couldn't have possibly gotten that from a fall.' She looked at me and said, 'No one told you? He was beaten.' "  Colleton County Coroner Richard Harvey told her over the phone that the beating contributed to Walls' death, but she was surprised when the death certificate listed the cause as natural and didn't mention the altercation. In an interview, Harvey said he did an autopsy but the results showed that Walls died of pneumonia, not from any other injuries.

The doctor wrote the summary in November, two months after Walls' death, and after an ombudsman hired by the lieutenant governor's Office on Aging visited the home. The agency had received a complaint about "residents that beat other residents," low staffing levels and "residents sitting in soiled diapers."  After the visit, the ombudsman noted the altercation involving Walls but said the agency doesn't investigate resident-to-resident abuse.

The ombudsman nonetheless concluded, "There is a shortage of staff," after looking at the facility's staffing logs. The reports showed the Alzheimer's unit had just one licensed nurse on duty for 52 patients on morning shifts before and after Walls' attack. On one night shift, the wing had no licensed nurse at all. The ombudsman asked the nursing home to follow state regulations, which requires at least two licensed nurses during the morning shift and one on the night shift.

More recently, an investigator with the state Department of Health and Environmental Control made an unannounced visit to the home and found it hadn't properly reported the incident involving Walls and the 88-year-old man who beat him. State law requires nursing homes to report "serious incidents" involving residents who assault others.


 

 

 

Flaws in Medicare rating system

WCCO out of Minnesota had an article about how most violations in nursing homes are under reported.  This seems like common sense since most employees do not want to risk their jobs admitting mistakes, and there is not enough personnel to enforce the regulations or conduct proper investigations. Many complaints are ignored because the nursing home claims the resident was demented.

The system designed to help Minnesotans choose a nursing home for loved ones is under fire. Serious flaws in the system have been uncovered by a nursing home watchdog group.  You might not know about physical and sexual abuse happening inside the nursing home.

Wes Bledsoe, the founder of a nursing home watchdog group, says he can prove that the rating system on Medicare.gov does not show what is really going on in nursing homes.  For example, after all of the well known abuse at Good Samaritan Society in Albert Lea, a report from the Minnesota Department of Health says no deficiencies were noted at the nursing home.

At a different facility in the state, someone saw an employee pick up a nightgown soaked with urine and that worker "shoved it in the resident's mouth and told her to shut up." Again, the Department of Health didn't note any deficiencies.

A spokesperson from the Minnesota Department of Health said "If a facility has taken appropriate steps to correct problems, they may not be cited with deficiencies."  However, when deficiencies aren't noted, they don't show up on the Medicare site, so there's no way you could know if you've only checked that Web site.

Bledsoe said it's happening all the time. He found that 80 percent of confirmed abuse cases in Minnesota in the last four years didn't get reported to the feds.

"I think it's bureaucratic mumbo-jumbo that's deceiving the consumers and the American public about what's really going on in our long-term care facilities," said Bledsoe.

Bledsoe said another big problem is the star system on the Medicare Web site. On a lot of the nursing home Web sites, a lot of the information is not available, so he's wondering how they can give a place four or five stars when there's no information.

How complaints are handled by state agencies

Stephanie Flemmons at sflemmons@acnpapers.com had a great article in the Plano Courier.  The article discusses how a complaint was handled by the state agency responsible for investigating nursing home resident's complaints.  Richard Ward was a resident who received a serious medication error that could have killed him.  The Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services ruled not to take any action against a facility that almost killed him.

“It strikes me as, you may have made a medication error that could have killed someone, but oh well,” Ward said. “We are not working on cars here, we are working on people.”

Ward’s formal complaint stated that the Life Care Center of Plano failed to administer the proper medication, which almost caused a fatal heart attack.  When Ward admitted himself to Life Care, he provided the nursing staff with an itemized list of the types of medications he was required to take, what the dosages were and the actual medications.

Ward said the nursing staff failed to administer his Coumadin.  He became aware days later when his physician conducted her examination.  “When the doctor conducted her physical it was almost too late,” Ward said. “She panicked after the results from an INR test came back normal. A normal level for a person with my heart conditions is a dangerous place.”

The physician immediately ordered Lovenox injections and Coumadin.  “I felt like I was on the brink of death,” Ward said. “I panicked.”

That night on May 28, Ward received his required Coumadin.  The next day the errors kept occurring. He received his Lovenox the next morning, but did not receive it that night.

“Medication time is at 9 p.m. and I waited until 10:30 p.m. to ask the nurses,” Ward said. “They argued with me. I had to force them to look it up.”   Ward said they realized they made a mistake, but at that point he had had enough.  “I thought these people were going to kill me,” Ward said. “That was their last chance.”

The state agency ruled this claim as unsubstantiated or unverified.

“I am flabbergasted,” Ward said. “I brought them a typed list of every medication that I picked up from the Medical Center of Plano before I admitted myself.”   Ward discharged himself from Life Care.  He reviewed his medical records.  The typed list was no longer in the records.

“They took it out because it showed blatant negligence,” Ward said. “All they had to do was lose one piece of paper and they wouldn’t look so bad.”

Ward’s second complaint alleged that the facility failed to maintain accurate clinical records.  DADS did find that the facility did have his name incorrect, but they did not issue a citation.

“How would they know who they were giving medicine to if they did not have the patient’s correct name?” Ward said. “At some point they gave me medicine, without the correct name on my records.”

Ward wrote prescriptions for 20 years in the Army and as a civilian.  He is concerned that the state agency’s rulings on both claims proves future such rulings could take the life of an innocent person.  “You just can’t make a mistake like this and not have any repercussions,” Ward said. “If they are doing this to someone who is awake and alert and knows how to read medical records, I’m sure they are doing this to someone else. I’m not an isolated case.”

Ward said they never contacted any of his family members or even asked him many questions regarding the claim.   According to DADS annual report, medication errors are No. 8 in their top 10 list for complaints.

 

Bush Administration secret rule related to nursing homes

Last night’s MSNBC Countdown with Keith Olbermann reported on a nursing home rule consumer advocates have been working tirelessly to highlight in the media and correct.   Before leaving office, President Bush silently pushed through this rule protecting the $144 billion nursing home industry. Occurring without any public notice or comment, the rule prevents families from receiving critical information about loved ones abused or neglected when suing nursing home corporations.

 

In addition to the Countdown segment, Bloomberg and Mother Jones have more on this rule that protects negligent nursing homes while leaving patients without details of government investigations into abuse and neglect.

 

The rule designates state inspectors and Medicare and Medicaid contractors as federal employees, a group usually shielded from providing evidence for either side in private litigation.  The restrictions affect about 16,000 nursing facilities in the U.S. and 3 million residents. The practical effect is to force litigants to go to greater lengths, including seeking court orders, to get inspection reports or depositions for cases they are pursuing or defending.

What is the point of an investigation or regulatory enforcement if the information is not made public?

New federal rules make it more difficult to get information

The Capital-Journal Editorial Board had a recent editorial about a change in federal rules on nursing home inspections that restricts access to information about care facilities. The changes were adopted by the Bush administration and went into effect in October.

"It's an extremely troubling development — it puts a lot of information related to nursing-home inspections off-limits," said the director of a nonprofit organization funded in part by the federal Administration on Aging. "I think it's certainly bad for consumers and the folks who represent them."

The change barred nursing home inspectors from releasing privileged information to the public without approval from the director of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. State employees who performed inspections for the federal government have been reclassified as federal employees as part of the revision.

The editorial was based on an Associated Press story which focused on an 81-year-old woman who was transported from a North Carolina nursing home to a hospital in 2006 with pain in her hip.  The woman's family later discovered her hip had been fractured, but no one at the nursing home had told the family anything about an accident.  Her daughter was able to find out what happened, but only by reviewing follow-up reports by state inspectors.

Under the new rules, those documents wouldn't be available except with approval by the head of the sprawling Medicare and Medicaid Services agency. In the North Carolina case, the family learned from state regulators that a nurse's aide had allowed her mother to fall. The aide then got colleagues to prop up the woman in a chair and agree not to report the incident to a supervisor, as required.  This kind of cover up is typical of many nursing homes.

It took more than two weeks for the woman to obtain treatment for the bone fracture. Now, she can't walk.

 

SCDHEC responds to questions regarding nursing homes

The SCDHEC website has an interesting question and answer session where they discuss nursing homes.  SCDHEC is responsible for licensing and enforcing the standards at nursing homes.  They are woefully understaffed and underfunded.  Below is an excerpt from "conversations with the Commissioner.

How many licensing people in DHEC's whole health licensing side? How many are assigned only to Community Residential Care Facilities?

DHEC’s Division of Health Licensing has 45 positions; three are vacant. The division has 29 inspectors. The community care oversight program has 13 positions. An additional inspector position is proposed, but has not been hired. One administrative person from the division’s operation support program is assigned responsibilities of processing CRCF applications for licensure.

How many investigators in DHEC's whole health licensing side? How many are assigned only to CRCFs?

We have 30 investigator positions. Of these, 11 are specifically assigned to CRCF in the Community Care Oversight Program.

Does DHEC need more inspectors and investigators for the CRCF program? How many?

Currently, the DHEC’s Division of Health Licensing licenses 489 CRCF’s with a total of 16,637 beds. We are assessing the CRCF program to determine how best to achieve the goals and responsibilities of the program. We’ll be happy to share the results once the study is completed.

Does this program have annual reports? (DHEC's solid waste division, for example, produces annually a nice comprehensive report.)

No.

How many natural deaths occur each year in CRCFs?

We do not collect that information as it is not required to be reported to DHEC by the facilities. We are to be notified by the facility of a death where there is an unusual circumstance that involves an investigation by the coroner or local law enforcement. We would investigate to determine whether there would be any violations of DHEC regulations that occurred. The investigation into the cause of the death and any criminal charges brought in the matter would be left to the coroner and local law enforcement agencies under their authority.

How many deaths due to staff negligence or inadequate staffing occur each year in CRCFs? (This question includes residents like the wheelchair death of a Peachtree Manor man, who was a resident but he was being pushed down the road.)

We are to be notified by the facilities when there is a death that is investigated by the coroner or local law enforcement. Criminal charges that may be brought would be done by those local authorities.

How many injuries occur each year in CRCFs? What is the nature of the injuries?

The facilities are required to notify DHEC of serious injuries that require hospitalization due to incidents involving fractures, burns, lacerations, hematomas, etc. While that information is reported to DHEC, we do not have the specific numbers compiled.

How many complaints do you get each year about CRCFs? How many are justified? What are the categories of complaints?

For the fiscal year July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008, we received 569 CRCF complaints alleging 2,592 various issues which resulted in 579 citations.

For the current fiscal year from July 1, 2008, we have received 186 complaints alleging 886 issues for which 14 citations have been cited. Some findings for this period are inconclusive at this time as most of the complaints are still open.

Often the citations noted were not associated with the original complaint. Many times we are unable to determine if the complaint was justified.

The complaints are typically taken under the following headings:

Abuse
Accessibility
Activities
Administrative
Animals
Background Checks
Care Plans
Charting/Records
Dietary/Food
Dirty Needles
Dumping
Finances
Fire Code
Housekeeping
Incident Reports
Level of Care
Maintenance
Misappropriations
Oxygen
Patient Rights
Pharmacology
Quality Program
Recreation Staff Unlicensed
Safety
Staff
Staff Training
TB Requirements
How many CRCFs has DHEC closed in recent years?

Within the most recent years DHEC has actively been involved in the forced closure of one facility; Peachtree Manor.

All other closures have been as a result of the voluntary surrender of the facility’s license or closure of the facility as a decision made by the licensee/owner. Our enforcement actions have contributed to many of the voluntary closures.

About how many CRCFs are like Still Hopes (a CRFC in West Columbia) where mostly upper income folks go.

We do not compile information whether a facility is strictly private or whether it accepts residents that receive the Optional State Supplement (OSS) or both. You can contact the S.C. Department of Health & Human Services to request information on those facilities residents who receive the OSS supplement.

The CRCF at Still Hopes is only one part of that overall facility. Still Hopes has apartments for independent living as well as a skilled-care nursing home.

Describe briefly DHEC's main concerns with its CRCF program.

Compliance with the requirements of Regulation 61-84, Standards for Licensing Community Residential Care Facilities. Pam Dukes and Commissioner Hunter can elaborate on this question at your meeting this afternoon.

Describe briefly how DHEC wants to address those concerns.

The Division of Health Licensing is reviewing Regulation 61-84 for possible revision. We are studying possible changes in the programs. We expect to have that process completed within the next 30 days.

Can I attend the 1 p.m. Oct. 22 CRCF meeting at the Heritage Building in Columbia mentioned in Ken Moore’s Sept. 26 memo?

This meeting is for our staff and invited directly affected stakeholders to review the CRCF program and potential regulatory changes. As such, the session is not considered a “public” meeting based on input from the agency’s legal staff as the group does not constitute a public body. Allowing media participation may significantly limit our ability to engage stakeholders in a completely open and frank dialogue. We do encourage you to attend future public CRCF meetings that will be held as we continue this process.

(Question 1 response) You write, “The Community Care Oversight Program has 13 positions.” Q. My questions: How many of these positions are filled with full-time on-duty people?

All 13 are full-time on-duty staff.

How many of these positions with full-time on-duty people are devoted EXCLUSIVELY to CRCFs? (The 489 facilities you regulate).

None of the 13 are devoted exclusively to CRCF.

Of the positions EXCLUSIVELY devoted by CRCFs and filled now by full-time on-duty FTEs, how many are investigators? Inspectors? (This entire question may be most easily addressed on the phone with someone. I just want to be sure we are describing your staffpower accurately. For example, we have a lot more positions in our newsroom than actual workers. We have lost many through buyouts, attrition, etc. Saying you have a position doesn't reveal much about actual staffing.)

The CRCF program staff that inspect facilities are inspectors. The program does not use the position title of investigator.

(Questions 2 response) Does the “Community Care Oversight Program” only concern the 489 CRCFs, or does it include other types of facilities?

The Community Care Oversight program includes 87 Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (MR15 and MR16). There are a total of 1,864 ICFMR beds.

(Question 8 response) You say for FY 07-08 you received 569 CRCF complaints alleging 2,592 issues... etc. (my question: Does this include the complaints forwarded to you by the Ombudsman’s office and Gloria Prevost’s group, Protection and Advocacy, which does about 85 contract inspections of CRCF’s a year for Department of Mental Health and forwards complaints to DHEC?)

Yes, but not all information forwarded to the CRCF program from these groups requires a DHEC investigation. Often, either the findings provided from their complaint investigation or the complaint itself is not within our scope of authority.

(Question 9 response)... Any idea how many closures in the past 3-4 years have been attributable in part to DHEC enforcement actions besides Peachtree?

Approximately 16 since 2004

On a different but related note: How many patients in state nursing homes? How many nursing homes?

For clarification, are you asking how many nursing homes are owned by the State of South Carolina, and how many patients are served in those homes? Or, is your question more general?

The general answer is that in South Carolina, we license 195 nursing homes with 19,647 beds. Most nursing homes in the state operate at over 95 percent occupancy.

If you want to know how many are State of South Carolina owned and how many beds are in those homes, we will need a couple of days to get you that information.


 

Poliakoff & Associates, P.A., is one of South Carolina’s most respected and distinguished law firms. The Poliakoff firm began nearlyMore...