Settlement in fall/pressure ulcer case

Levin & Perconti reported on their blog that they helped the family of a victim of nursing home abuse in their settlement against the Mercy Health Care Rehabilitation Center, securing a $690,000 settlement for the 87-year-old victim's family.

The victim was initially admitted to the nursing home after suffering a stroke that caused her some left-sided weakness. When she entered the nursing home she required supervision and needed assistance with activities. She was known to be a fall risk. However, despite the nursing home’s knowledge of her fall risk, they allowed her to fall. She suffered a right femur fracture which was treated with a brace. While still in the nursing home’s care, she suffered a skin breakdown from the brace rubbing against her leg. This breakdown still went untreated by the nursing home staff and the victim developed Osteomyelitis. The combination of the fracture and the infection contributed to the victim’s death seven months later, according to the settlement report.

The nursing home negligence complaint alleged that the defendant nursing home failed to appropriately develop, implement or revise a care plan to address the decedent’s fall risk and failed to ensure that the decedent received proper supervision to prevent falls. It also stated that after her fall, the nursing home failed to provide preventative measures to avoid the development of skin breakdown, and failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to promote the healing of the decedent’s skin breakdown.

Verdict in Elder Neglect Trial

The Sacramento Bee had two articles here and here about the jury's verdict against Colonial Healthcare and its parent company, Horizon West of Rocklin.  The jury found that the nursing home committed elder abuse in the death of a woman in 2005.  After deliberating fewer than two days, the jurors unanimously agreed that Defendants were responsible for the death of Frances Tanner.

They awarded $1.1 million in damages for Tanner's pain and suffering and for her daughter Elizabeth Pao's loss of companionship. They also decided that the home's conduct was "malicious, oppressive or fraudulent," therefore punitive damages may be awarded also.  The jury will hear further testimony about the corporation's finances before deciding on punitive damages.

Tanner was 79 years old, spirited and mobile but suffering from mild dementia, when she moved into the home in March 2005. Seven months later, after a preventable fall caused by neglect that resulted in a broken hip, she was dead from an infected bedsore.  Jurors heard evidence of chronic understaffing, poor medical documentation and corporate greed. One former Colonial staffer said he would not place a relative at the home.  Colonial and Horizon put profits before good patient care.

Colonial, which recently changed its name to Hilltop Manor, has a history of problems with state regulators. The Tanner case was the fourth in recent years in which the home was cited in the death of an elderly patient.

"We have a corporate culture here that is callously indifferent to human life," Sacramento attorney Ed Dudensing said in closing arguments this week.  "They value money but not patient care."

Colonial "recklessly failed Frances Tanner in every way conceivable," Dudensing said, including allowing her to endure a fractured hip, keeping poor notes on her care and missing the skin condition that killed her.

One advocate, Carole Herman of Foundation Aiding the Elderly, said lack of proper staffing may be the most critical issue facing nursing home patients and their families.

Here and here are two article reporting the $28 million puntive award verdict.   "The jurors obviously felt that this is what they needed to do to send the message, to attempt to deter future bad conduct," Dudensing said. 

They decided on punitive damages after hearing evidence about the corporation's finances.  Horizon West is worth about $200 million. He suggested $10 million would be an appropriate punitive award for the chronic understaffing and inadequate care that he said led to Tanner's death.

 

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/05/14/2749834/nursing-home-ordered-to-pay-28.html#ixzz0nubuVtAc
 

Punitive Damages awarded

The Philadelphia Inquirer wrote an article on the recent verdict that included punitive damages.  A jury awarded $5 million in punitive damages against Jeanes Hospital and a Wyncote nursing home in the death of a man caused by preventable fatal bedsores.  The damages - $1.5 million against Jeanes and $3.5 million against the Hillcrest Convalescent Home - came two weeks after the same Common Pleas Court jury awarded $1 million in compensatory damages in the case. The damages were awarded to the widow of Joe N. Blango.

Steven R. Maher, who represented Blango's widow, said that in his 25 years of handling such cases, this was only the second time a jury had awarded punitive damages. One reason, he said, was the high standards required to permit punitive damages to be considered. A jury must find that a facility had engaged in "outrageous and reckless conduct," he said.

Blango went to Jeanes on May 21, 2006, after suffering weakness and confusion. He was 74 at the time and was thought to have suffered a stroke.  Doctors at Jeanes failed to properly diagnose that Blango was suffering from a urinary-tract infection that worsened andcaused the bedsores that ultimately killed him. The staff allowed the bedsores to fester and Blango to go malnourished to the point that he lost 28 pounds.

"This verdict sends a message," Maher said, "that this type of care is unacceptable and will not be tolerated."

 

Seniors for Sale

The Seattle Times had a great article called "Seniors for Sale".  The article discusses the unfortunate plight of Nadra McSherry.   She needed an adult family home and settled on Narrows View Manor in Tacoma, owned by Arlie and Charlene Leno.   They relied on the fact that adult homes were licensed by the state Department of Social and Health Services. 

McSherry paid $3,500 a month for a bedroom, prepared meals and daily care delivered by a staff of aides.  McSherry's daughters had no clue that only weeks earlier, inspectors for DSHS had swept into the home and uncovered 14 safety and health violations. And they had no idea that Arlie Leno harbored a troubling past, one enabled by state regulators.

In 1990, Arlie Leno left his job as a nursing-home administrator and became his own boss, getting a state license to run a Tacoma boarding home with 16 adult residents. He called it Tule Lake Manor. Leno's residents ranged from the bed bound to those with late-stage Alzheimer's disease or Down syndrome. Despite his work experience, Leno got into trouble within a few months of opening Tule Lake Manor.

Inspectors for DSHS cited him for 18 violations including failing to properly train staff, notify family when a resident fell and broke a hip, and obtain medical care for a resident who fell and was injured.  Inspectors found that one staffer had lost her nurse's-aide license for "alcohol and drug issues"; another was on probation for a felony assault conviction and, by law, was not allowed to be alone with a vulnerable adult.

In 2000, DSHS revoked Leno's boarding-home license, citing a decade of abuse and neglect and evidence that residents had "suffered actual harm." Between 1990 and 2000, state inspectors had cited Leno with 135 violations.  He sold Tule Lake Manor for $422,000.

After Arlie Leno gave up his boarding home in 2000, he began taking a more active role at Narrows View.  After that, inspectors cited the home more often for violations including failing to train staff and to screen them for infectious diseases.

In 2002, they declared bankruptcy. They said they netted about $30,000 a year from their business but had $316,000 in mortgage and other debts, including $40,000 in delinquent federal taxes.

More violations piled up at Narrows View Manor: They failed to create a "care plan" for each resident. The care plan is a critical blueprint that tells staff exactly what care each resident requires: what medications to take and when, how often a resident has to be turned to avoid bedsores, what diet to follow, and so on.

Arlie Leno also hired a woman convicted of felony assault to care for the residents. By law, her conviction barred her from working there.

In July 2003, the couple separated and Charlene Leno, then 60, moved out. Their breakup created problems for Arlie Leno as well as for his residents. His wife was listed on the state license as the "provider," meaning she was the owner responsible for overseeing care.

Arlie Leno's solution was to lie repeatedly to inspectors about his wife's whereabouts. For nearly a year, state records show, he told DSHS investigators that his wife was away on vacation or visiting family.  DSHS officials finally discovered the deception.   Leno had lied at least four times so DSHS fined them a measly $400.

That same year, 2004, Arlie Leno sneaked an extra resident into Narrows View. By law, he was limited to six residents, but he added a seventh, apparently to squeeze out more profits.

During a DSHS inspection in July 2004, Leno told a staffer that he had only six residents, five female and one male. The inspector became suspicious when he spotted a second male resident walk out of the staff bedroom, and asked his identity.

In another case, a resident fell on the bathroom floor and broke her leg but the caregiver refused to call an ambulance. "We don't do that here," DSHS records recount the caregiver as saying. "We call the family to take them."   The injured woman's family wasn't called until nearly three hours after she fell, records show. 

Again, DSHS settled for modest fines.

All through this time, McSherry's daughters and other family members visited her nearly every day at Narrows View; daughter Janice McDonald, who worked at a hospital nearby, would stop in after work.  "One might wonder why we didn't see what was going on," Elaine Matsuda would later explain. "There are some things that are so subtle. And what Arlie Leno didn't want us to see is not going to happen while we're there."   The McSherry family knew nothing of Leno's serious violations.

In June 2006, McSherry developed a small bedsore on her tailbone. The daughters arranged for a registered nurse to visit the Leno home and treat her wound.   Once the wound had sufficiently healed, the nurse showed aides at Narrows View how to treat pressure sores. She told the staff to alert her or McSherry's doctor if the sore flared again.

Within two months, McSherry's pressure sore re-emerged, medical records show. But no one at the home recognized its danger and no one in McSherry's family was told about it, nor were her doctor or nurse. The wound remained untreated for more than a month. Aides did rub an ointment on it each day. But the ointment was not suitable for pressure sores. In fact, records show, the ointment made it worse.

After sitting for a month with a painful festering bedsore, she finally said, "My bottom hurts," McDonald recalled.  She undressed her mother, then gasped. "There was a quarter-size hole in the skin. It went to the bone," she said.

A nurse visiting Leno's home at the time examined McSherry's tailbone and was alarmed. It was the worst pressure sore she had seen in 20 years of practice, she later told DSHS investigators. It was a Stage IV ulcer, meaning it had eaten through her skin, muscles and connective tissue, down to the bone.

McSherry was rushed to the emergency room, then admitted to Allenmore Hospital. For nearly a month, doctors unleashed a medical arsenal against the raging infection and the pain. Nothing worked.  She died.

Dr. Richard Waltman, who signed her death certificate, said McSherry died of a heart attack brought on by infection from the bedsore. "It was too much for her body to handle," he said.

"My mother died a horrifically painful death. She weighed 80 pounds when she died. They were giving her morphine that would have knocked out a 400-pound football player," Matsuda said. "She still would scream and yell and cry out in pain and delirium from the medication."

DSHS determined that Leno's mistreatment of McSherry did not warrant revoking his license. It required him, for the first time, to post his violations publicly. And it did fine him $3,200: $100 for each of the 32 days that he failed to provide proper care to McSherry the price of one preventable death.

This infuriated Matsuda and her sisters. Since McSherry's death, DSHS found more serious violations at Leno's home. In May 2007, a female resident was found crawling in the middle of a four-lane street in a busy intersection. The woman, who had Alzheimer's disease, ended up in a nearby emergency room with a head wound.

Finally in May 2007, Janice Schurman, a DSHS supervisor, wrote to her superiors that field investigators felt Leno should lose his license.  Supervisors overruled her.   DSHS supervisors ultimately ruled in favor of Leno, who will be 83 years old this year.   He holds a dubious record: No adult-home owner has amassed as many serious violations as Leno has and still remained open for business.

McSherry's daughters were haunted by their mother's neglect.   Matsuda contacted Seattle attorney Anthony Shapiro, who determined that Arlie Leno had no major assets and did not carry liability insurance.  Shapiro embraced a novel strategy: He filed a civil suit against DSHS under the legal doctrine of "deliberate indifference." He had to prove that DSHS knew that a substantial risk to residents existed at Leno's adult family home and chose to ignore it.

"This was not the only incident in Narrows View's history where pressure ulcers and pressure sores cropped up among patients," Shapiro said. "They had a long history of people having pressure sores and DSHS knew about it and other than noting it, and coming in periodically, the practice at this home really never changed.

DSHS settled with McSherry's family late last year for $565,000. Leno, also named in the suit, reached a confidential settlement with the family.

A Times reporter telephoned a DSHS regional office and, as any member of the public can do, asked about the enforcement history at Arlie Leno's home.   A DSHS staffer mischaracterized the bulk of Leno's history of violations as minor infractions and "paperwork problems."

When she came to the 2006 violations regarding McSherry, the staffer noted that a resident had developed a "little pressure ulcer."  When asked if the woman died from neglect, the DSHS staffer consulted the enforcement computer once again.

Oh, no, she said. "It doesn't show anything about a death
 

Punitive damages for neglect

PRWeb summarized a story from the NY Post about punitive damages against a nursing home in New York.   The New York Post reported that in December 2009, a Brooklyn nursing home was found guilty of negligence in the case of a patient who developed numerous and avoidable bedsores while under the home’s care. The jury awarded the patient’s family close to $4 million for pain and suffering, plus an additional $15 million as punishment for trying to cover up the poor patient care.

Elder abuse is prevalent in nursing homes around the country, and with serious consequences for patients. Older adults who are victims of elder abuse are more than twice as likely to die prematurely as are adults who are treated properly, according to a study published in the August 5, 2009 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Mistreatment can take many different forms, including physical, emotional, psychological or sexual abuse; neglect; withholding food and water; or denying visits from family and friends.  Family members and friends of nursing home residents must be vigilant in looking for signs of possible abuse or neglect.  These can include personality changes, depression, anxiety, unexplained or unusual bruises and injuries, rapid weight loss, poor grooming, and potentially unsafe conditions.
The National Center on Elder Abuse defines institutional elder abuse as “any of several forms of maltreatment of an older person by someone who has a special relationship with the elder (a spouse, a sibling, a child, a friend, or a caregiver)” that occur in residential facilities for older persons, including nursing homes. Its website, www.ncea.aoa.gov, explains that “perpetrators of institutional abuse usually are persons who have a legal or contractual obligation to provide elder victims with care and protection (e.g., paid caregivers, staff, professionals).

Looking exclusively at falls, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention noted that an average nursing home with 100 beds reports 100 to 200 falls each year, representing up to 75 percent of residents. Many falls were caused by environmental hazards like wet floors, poor lighting, incorrect bed height and improper wheelchair use.

A November 2009 report from the University of California, San Francisco, stated that 26 percent of the nation’s nursing facilities were cited in 2008 for poor quality of care, 44 percent of nursing homes failed to ensure a safe environment for residents, 36 percent had food sanitation regulations violations and 33 percent of facilities received deficiencies for failure to meet quality standards.

 

 


 

New GAO Report on Underreporting of Violations

The Government Accountability Office issued a new report titled Addressing the Factors Underlying Understatement of Serious Care Problems Requires Sustained CMS and State Commitment.  Not surprisingly South Carolina is one of the worst offendersReducing understatement is critical to protecting the health and safety of vulnerable nursing home residents and ensuring the credibility of the survey process. Federal and state efforts will require a sustained, long-term commitment because understatement arises from weaknesses in several interrelated areas—including CMS’s survey process, surveyor workforce and training, supervisory review processes, and state agency practices and external pressure.

The conclusions reached include as follows:
Concerns about CMS’s Survey Process.
Survey methodology and guidance are integral to reliable and consistent state nursing home surveys, and we found that weaknesses in these areas were linked to understatement by both surveyors and state agency directors. Both groups reported struggling to interpret existing guidance, and differences in interpretation were linked to understatement, especially in determining what constitutes actual harm. Surveyors noted that the current survey guidance was too lengthy, complex, and subjective. Additionally, they had fewer concerns about care areas for which CMS has issued revised interpretive protocols.

Ongoing Workforce and Surveyor Training Challenges. Workforce shortages in state survey agencies increase the need for high-quality initial and ongoing training for surveyors. Currently, high vacancy rates can place pressure on state surveyors to complete surveys under difficult circumstances, including compressed time frames, inadequately staffed survey teams, and too many inexperienced surveyors. States are responsible for hiring and retaining surveyors and have grappled with pervasive and intractable workforce shortages. State agency directors struggling with these workforce issues reported the need for more readily accessible training for both their new and experienced surveyors that did not involve travel to a central location. Nearly 30 percent of surveyors in high-understatement states stated that initial surveyor training, which is primarily a state activity that incorporates two CMS on-line computer courses and a 1-week federal basic training course culminating in the SMQT, was not adequate to identify deficiencies and cite them at the appropriate scope and severity level. State agency directors reported that workforce shortages also impede states’ ability to provide ongoing training opportunities for experienced staff and that additional CMS online training and electronic training media would help states maintain an experienced, well-informed workforce.

Supervisory Review Limitations.
Currently, CMS provides little guidance on how states should structure supervisory review processes, leaving the scope of this important quality-assurance tool exclusively to the states and resulting in considerable variation throughout the nation in how these processes are structured. We believe that state quality assurance processes are a more effective preventive measure against understatement because they have the potential to be more immediate and cover more surveys than the limited number of federal comparative surveys conducted in each state. However, compared to reviews of serious deficiencies, states conducted relatively fewer reviews of deficiencies at the D through F level, those that were most frequently understated throughout the nation, to assess whether or not such deficiencies were cited at too low a scope and severity level.  In addition, we found that frequent changes to survey results made during supervisory review were symptomatic of workforce shortages and survey methodology weaknesses.

State Agency Practices and External Pressure In a few states, noncitation practices, challenging relationships with the industry or legislators, or unbalanced IDR processes—those that surveyors regard as favoring nursing home operators over resident welfare—may have had a negative effect on survey quality and resulted in the citation of fewer nursing home deficiencies than was warranted.  In one state, both the state agency director and over 40 percent of surveyors acknowledged the existence of a noncitation practice such as allowing a home to correct a deficiency without receiving a citation.  Forty percent of surveyors in four other states also responded on our questionnaire that noncitation practices existed.   Twelve state agency directors reported on our questionnaire experiencing some kind of external pressure. For example, in one state a legislator attended a survey and questioned surveyors as to whether state agency executives were coercing them to find deficiencies. Under such circumstances, it is difficult to know if the affected surveyors are consistently enforcing federal standards and reporting all deficiencies at the appropriate scope and severity levels. States’ differing experiences regarding the enforcement of federal standards and collaboration with their CMS regional offices in the face of significant external pressure also may confuse or undermine a thorough and independent survey process. If surveyors believe that CMS does not fully or consistently support the enforcement of federal standards, these surveyors may choose to avoid citing deficiencies that they perceive may trigger a reaction from external stakeholders. In addition, deficiency determinations may be influenced when IDR processes are perceived to favor nursing home operators over resident welfare.

Recommended Action includes:

Make sure that action is taken to address concerns identified with the new QIS methodology, such as ensuring that it accurately identifies potential quality problems; and clarify and revise existing CMS written guidance to make it more concise, simplify its application in the field, and reduce confusion, particularly on the definition of actual harm.

To address surveyor workforce shortages and insufficient training, we recommend that the Administrator of CMS take the following two actions: (1)  consider establishing a pool of additional national surveyors that could augment state survey teams or identify other approaches to help states experiencing workforce shortages; and (2) evaluate the current training programs and division of responsibility between federal and state components to determine the most cost-effective approach to: (1) providing initial surveyor training to new surveyors, and (2) supporting the continuing education of experienced surveyors.

To address inconsistencies in state supervisory reviews, we recommend that the Administrator of CMS take the following action:
Set an expectation through guidance that states have a supervisory review program as a part of their quality-assurance processes that includes routine reviews of deficiencies at the level of potential for more than minimal harm (D-F) and that provides feedback to surveyors regarding changes made to citations.

To address state agency practices and external pressure that may compromise survey accuracy, we recommend that the Administrator of CMS take the following two actions: (1)  reestablish expectations through guidance to state survey agencies that noncitation practices—official or unofficial—are inappropriate, and systematically monitor trends in states’ citations; and (2) establish expectations through guidance to state survey agencies to communicate and collaborate with their CMS regional offices when they experience significant pressure from legislators or the nursing home industry that may affect the survey process or surveyors’ perceptions

Complaint filed in pressue ulcer case

The Madison Record had an article about a recent complaint filed by Steven Steiner against Caseyville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center and Caseyville Property.  Theresa Mary Steiner died after employees at an Illinois nursing home allowed her pressure sores to deteriorate, causing sepsis to flow throughout her blood.

On Dec. 12, 2008, Caseyville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center admitted Theresa Steiner as its patient, according to the complaint. At the time of her admission, Theresa Steiner had three stage II pressure sores on her buttocks and one pressure sore on each of her heels, the suit states.   However, by the time of her discharge on Dec. 19, 2008, Theresa Steiner had three stage IV pressure sores on her buttocks and multiple pressure sores on her heels, the complaint says.

"Steiner sustained personal injuries, including, but not limited to, development and deterioration of her pressure sores on her buttocks and bilateral heels which, in turn, led to Steiner developing sepsis throughout her bloodstream," the suit states. "On December 19, 2008, Theresa Steiner was hospitalized at Memorial Hospital in Belleville, Illinois, where she subsequently died on January 7, 2009, due to sepsis and acute respiratory failure."

Before her death, Theresa Steiner experienced severe pain and suffering, mental anguish, emotional distress and loss of dignity.  Steven Steiner blames the defendants for a number of negligent acts, including their failure to properly screen Theresa Steiner before admitting her, their failure to have an adequate wound care nurse on staff, their failure to develop an appropriate plan to treat Theresa Steiner's pressure sores, their failure to advise Theresa Steiner's physician of the deterioration of her pressure sores and their failure to adopt appropriate policies to treat pressure sores.

In the six-count complaint, Steven Steiner is seeking a judgment of more than $300,000, plus attorney's fees, costs and other relief the court deems just. William P. Gavin of Gavin Law Firm in Belleville will be representing him.


 

Verdict in pressure ulcer case

The Herald-News had an article about a recent jury verdict against Rosewood Care Center.  The jury awarded $51,000 and attorney's fees.    Resident Catherine Taylor died after suffering a huge bedsore that ate through her skin to the bone causing her death.  Taylor, who was 88 when she died in December 2004, was a resident of Rosewood in July and August 2004, On Aug. 19, 2004, Taylor, a former teacher, was taken to Provena Saint Joseph Medical Center and six days later "underwent a procedure to remove bedsores and treat bone infections brought on by her confinement to her bed and her exposure to urine and other bodily fluids during (her) care," according to the complaint against Rosewood.

"She had a hole in her backside the size of my fist," said Scott Pyles, the other attorney representing Taylor's estate.  And Pyles said the bedsore was the fault of the nursing home staff.

"Rosewood screwed up on 8/18 (2004)," he said. "Everybody who testified in this case has told you about it, and it caused Catherine Taylor's death."

"We feel vindicated that we proved that they did something wrong," said Frank Cservenyak, one of the attorneys representing Taylor's daughter, Mary Pat Barney, who was acting as the administrator of her mother's estate.

 

Staffing ratios as a determinant to quality of care

L.A. Times had an article about the obvious importance of staffing in providing quality care in nursing homes.  The cornerstone to quality care in a nursing home is staffing.  Those with larger staffs tend to have less turnover, more stability and are more likely to meet the needs of all the residents.

"There is some very persuasive data showing staff simply can't perform all of the responsibilities they have unless there is an adequate ratio of staff to residents," says Janet Wells, policy director for the National Citizen's Coalition for Nursing Home Reform, a reform-activist-advocacy organization.  Homes should be staffed to provide at least 3 1/2 to four hours of care per resident in a 24-hour period, says Larry Minnix, chief executive of the American Assn. of Homes and Services for the Aging, a nonprofit organization that represents not-for-profit elder-care facilities. Some may need to offer four to five hours daily depending on the conditions of the residents.

To assess staffing levels, Pat McGinnis, executive director of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, recommends visiting at a time when a facility is most likely to have maximum staff on duty (like at lunch, the biggest meal of the day).  Telltale signs of understaffing include diners with food trays who are not eating because they are not receiving necessary assistance, residents sitting idly in common areas or their rooms with nothing to hold their attention, call buttons going unanswered, and development of pressure ulvers.

Visiting during mealtime is also a good way to gauge food quality. Weight loss can be dangerous to the elderly, so food should look and smell appetizing.  Some of the more progressive homes have buffet lines rather than the "school lunchroom program," in which residents shuffle through with trays, Minnix says. "Food is the most looked-forward-to institution for many people, especially those confined to a home," he says. "You should ask about snacks and what kind of weight loss-weight gain program they have."


 

$700,000 Settlement in neglect case

The Herald-Review.com had an article about Certified Health Care Management Inc (which was the company that once managed Prairie View Care Center nursing home) and Dr. Carl Johnson.  They recently agreed to settle a lawsuit filed after a resident of the home died because of injuries he received there. The $700,000 settlement went to the estate of Donald McCormick Jr., who was only 43 years old when he died Nov. 24, 2002.   According to Levin & Perconti, the Chicago law firm that filed the lawsuit, McCormick was admitted to Prairie View on March 19, 2002. The firm said he suffered impairments and was dependent on nursing home staff for all activities of daily living.

McCormick's impairments also made him unable to communicate his needs to nursing home staff, and from his admission until his discharge on May 12, 2002, he became severely malnourished, dehydrated and developed a massive bed sore.  The wound became so bad that it exposed a bone, and the injuries were caused by the nursing home and a doctor's failure to provide adequate medical and personal care, leading to his death.

Case documents indicated that Certified Health Care Management agreed to pay $600,000 to McCormick's estate, and Johnson agreed to pay $100,000. The lawsuit was filed in Cook County because that's where the nursing home's management company is located.

 

Poliakoff & Associates, P.A., is one of South Carolina’s most respected and distinguished law firms. The Poliakoff firm began nearly 60 years ago by three attorney brothers: Matthew, J. Manning, and Bernard. With a history of believing the justice system...More...