Ranking nursing homes

U.S. News & World Report issues the best and worst nursing homes every year based on federal and state inspections, surveys, and required data on staffing.  Here is the most recent article.  The rankings are only as good as the investigators which in most cases is poor.  On a given day, 1.5 million people are living in the nation's 16,000-plus nursing homes, and in a typical year more than 3.2 million Americans will spend at least some time in one. 

 

The U.S. News rankings rely on Nursing Home Compare, a program run by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS analyzes information on all homes enrolled in Medicare or Medicaid.  The homes also receive ratings of one to five stars in each of three areas: health inspections, nurse staffing, and measures of care.

At Nursing Home Compare, you can search for a specific home or for all homes in a particular state or within a certain distance of your city or ZIP code. But you can't assume that all five-star homes, or those with three or four stars, are of the same quality. There are so many homes in each rating—1,855 in the five-star and 3,661 in the four-star categories alone—that the range of performance is bound to be very wide. Nor can search terms be combined if, say, you want only five-star homes within 50 miles of a specific city.

America's Best Nursing Homes addresses these and other issues. Homes are presented in tiers within each star category, based on their total stars in all three of the major areas. The topmost tier, for example, consists only of five-star homes that got 15 stars. The next tier down is five-star homes with 14 total stars, and so on.

Here are more details about the measures that go into the CMS ratings.

Health inspections. Because almost all nursing homes accept Medicare or Medicaid residents, they are regulated by the federal government as well as by the states in which they operate. State survey teams conduct health inspections on behalf of CMS about every 12 to 15 months. They also investigate health-related complaints from residents, their families, and other members of the public. "Health" is broadly defined, as is evident in the 180-some items on the checklist. Besides such matters as safety of food preparation and adequacy of infection control, the list covers such issues as medication management, residents' rights and quality of life, and proper skin care. A home's rating is based on the number of deficiencies, their seriousness, and their scope, meaning the relative number of residents who were or could have been affected. Deficiencies are counted that were identified during the three most recent health inspections and in investigations of public complaints in that time frame. State inspectors also check for compliance with fire safety rules, although their findings do not factor into the CMS ratings.

Nurse staffing. Even the best nursing care is not enough if there are too few nurses to spend much time with residents, so CMS determines average nursing time per patient per day. Homes report the average number of registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, licensed vocational nurses, and certified nurse aides who were on the payroll during the two weeks prior to the most recent health inspection and their number of hours worked. The information is compared with the average number of residents during the same period and crunched to determine the average number of minutes of nursing time residents got per day. 

Quality measures. Nursing homes have to furnish the latest three quarters of clinical data showing the status of each individual Medicare and Medicaid resident in 19 indicators, such as the percentage of residents who had urinary tract infections or who were physically restrained to keep from falling from a bed or a chair. The Best Nursing Homes rankings and Nursing Home Compare display data for each home on all 19. The ratings, however, are based on 10 that are considered the most valid and reliable, such as the two above and measures related to pain, bedsores, and mobility.

 

Use of Antipsychotics

McKnight's also ran an article about the recent studies that prove the off label use and over use of dangerous antipsychotics to elderly and vulnerable patients. Antipsychotic medication use is still widespread in nursing homes, even after the federal government issued a “black box” warning on the drugs in 2005 according to two new studies.

The drugs in question include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine and paliperidone. Doctors prescribe these drugs, which are designed to treat bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, off-label for residents with dementia. Both studies appeared in Monday's issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine.
 

Overuse of antipsychotic

As a follow up to yesterday's blog entry, here is another article about the overuse of antipsychotic medications in nursing homes by Business Week.   The practice can threaten physical health. Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration instituted a "black box" warning in 2005, one study found a 19 percent decrease in the prescription of atypical antipsychotics in elderly people with dementia.  But the researchers found that in 2008, antipsychotics still represented 9 percent of all prescriptions in this group.

"The [2005] safety warning pertained to an increased risk of death among individuals using these drugs, so the public health ramifications of use of these drugs in elderly people with dementia, often in nursing homes, which we consider a vulnerable population, is concerning," said Dr. E. Ray Dorsey, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of Rochester Medical Center and lead author of one of the studies in the Jan. 11 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Antipsychotics are widely used "off label" to control difficult behavior in elderly people with dementia. Indeed, Dorsey said he suspects that the vast majority of the use documented in his research is "off label." In the United States, no antipsychotics are approved to calm behavior.

The second study found that almost one-third of residents in nursing homes were prescribed antipsychotics and that one-third of that number did not have dementia or psychosis.  Newly arrived residents were more likely to receive this type of drug if they were in a nursing home that routinely prescribed such drugs, suggesting that organizational culture and not patients are driving the trend.

"If you enter a nursing home that has a higher proportion of people on antipsychotics, you are also likely to be put on antipsychotics," Briesacher said.
 

Overmedication in nursing homes

NY Times had a great article on the too common practice of overmedicating residents in nursing homes.  Nursing homes often chemically restrain residents because it is easier:  No complaints, no call bells, no requests.   Management can then staff less people on certain shifts especially at night.  Paula Spann wrote a great article.

Within three months of admission, a team of University of South Florida researchers determined, 71 percent of Medicaid residents in Florida nursing homes were receiving a psychoactive medication — an antidepressant or anti-psychotic, or dementia drugs — even though most were not taking such drugs in the months before they moved in and didn’t have psychiatric diagnoses. 15 percent of residents were taking four or more such medications.  Only 12 percent were getting nondrug treatments like behavioral therapy.

The article mentions Victor Molinari, a professor of aging at the University of South Florida and lead author of the study.  He wasn’t startled by those statistics. “They confirmed what I suspected,” he told me in an interview. “And people who work in nursing homes wouldn’t be surprised.  It seems the use of psychoactive medication is trumping the use of nondrug treatments,” Dr. Molinari said.   And given the possible interactions with the many other drugs most residents take, an average 10 or more prescriptions, “it could well be that we’re causing problems like falls, confusion and delirium, and hospitalizations,” he cautioned.

Nursing homes’ reliance on psychoactive drugs has troubled professionals in geriatrics for years.   In many states, residents being admitted directly from hospitals are exempt from screening.  As a result, federal data show, fewer than half of residents with major mental illnesses receive the mandated assessment.  Only half of nursing homes provide weekly patient consultations with psychiatrists, psychologists or other mental health experts; even fewer provide consultations with those who specialize in working with seniors. In addition, staffs are stretched thin and inadequately trained in mental health care. With a pill a quicker and simpler intervention than the alternatives, intentional overuse is the result.   If the aide had fewer patients to care for or if management increased staffing numbers, and more time to soothe one who was agitated, if she’d had better training in responding to behavioral problems, she might be able to handle behavioral issues.  

The Justice Department brought criminal charges against Eli Lilly, accusing the big pharmaceutical firm of illegally marketing its anti-psychotic Zyprexa to doctors who work in nursing homes and assisted living facilities, and encouraging them to prescribe it for sleep disorders and dementia. Its approved use is to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Lilly agreed to pay $1.4 billion in a related civil settlement.

“For years, I’ve had calls from family members saying, ‘Mom was completely lucid when she went into the nursing home, and a week later she no longer recognized us,’” said Janet Wells, public policy director of NCCNHR, formerly the National Citizens’ Coalition for Nursing Home Reform. “Families should question why drugs are prescribed, do some research. A lot of drugs are being used as restraints.”

Paula Span is the author of the recently published “When the Time Comes: Families With Aging Parents Share Their Struggles and Solutions.”

 

Spending on nursing home care rose

Life and Time Health Insurance reported that spending on nursing home care climbed to more than $138 billion in 2008, up 4.6% from the 2007 total, according to federal analysts.  The "good" news is that the rate of increase decelerated from 5.8% in 2007.   Analysts from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have reported those figures in the latest issue of Health Affairs, an academic journal that covers health care finance and delivery systems.

The slowdown in the LTC spending growth rate was due partly to reduced growth in private spending on nursing homes.  Private payers account for 38% of total spending on nursing home services.  Increases in nursing home care prices fell to 4% in 2008, from 4.7% in 2007, and that also contributed to the deceleration, the researchers report.

Meanwhile, public spending for nursing home services grew slightly faster than the year before because of increased growth in Medicaid nursing home spending.  Medicaid, which accounted for 41% of total nursing home spending in 2008, saw spending on that item grow 2.6% in 2008, after growing just 2.6% in 2007 and 1.5% in 2006.

 

Guilty plea in health care fraud case

St. Louis Today had an article about a criminal enterprise masquerading as a nursing home.  Luckily they got caught and the company pleaded guilty to fraud and will pay $1.6 million in fines and restitution.

When the Texas-based Cathedral Rock Corp. bought 11 Missouri and Illinois nursing homes in 2001, owner and CEO C. Kent Harrington told employees that residents were the first priority and would get "extra-special treatment."

The real priority was packing elderly and disabled clients into those homes — including five in the St. Louis area that were understaffed and provided substandard care, according to court documents and federal prosecutors.   Until 2005, the services "were grossly inadequate" and represented "a complete failure of care," Assistant U.S. Attorney Dorothy McMurtry said in court.

It also settled a whistle-blower civil lawsuit filed by nurses in 2003 that triggered what officials said was a relatively rare criminal prosecution of a nursing home over poor care.

Five Cathedral Rock-owned companies that ran those homes agreed to pay $1 million in criminal fines and penalties, and $628,000 in the civil settlement.  The companies will be formally sentenced in April, likely to some term of probation in addition to the fines and penalties.  So no one is going to jail for defrauding the government, stealing from medicare and medicaid, and directly causing the deaths of dozens of residents!

Among the claims was that the homes' staff doctored patient charts, falsified drug records and failed to give necessary medications. Some residents suffered from bed sores. Others wandered away. One ended up on a roof. One was found days later. One died after falling from a window.  The homes were repeatedly cited by regulators, fined and penalized.   Officials said the homes filed corrective plans but then failed to comply or "misrepresented" their efforts to comply.

"FTB (fill the beds) is everything," read a 2004 e-mail from a Cathedral Rock regional vice president to another executive. "Whereas compliance is important and cost control is as well, CENSUS is to be your primary focus," the e-mail read.

In 2004, Cathedral Rock had 2,600 beds in 25 nursing homes and assisted-living facilities in Missouri, Illinois, Texas, Ohio and South Carolina, Harrington said at the time.

Its website currently lists 1,308 beds in 15 homes in Texas and New Mexico. A spokesman said it no longer operates facilities in Missouri or Illinois.

 

Greedy CEO pleads guilty

The Hartford Courant had an article about another greedy nursing home CEO. The former chief executive of a now defunct nursing home chain pleaded guilty to federal charges that he improperly used money intended for the homes to buy real estate.   Raymond Termini pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and engaging in unlawful monetary transaction.

Termini stole a $6 million loan for private business transactions, and up to $2 million for sprinklers at the nursing homes instead to buy real estate and other purposes.  Termini was CEO of Middletown-based Haven Healthcare, one of the state's largest nursing home chains before it filed for bankruptcy protection in 2007, operating 27 facilities in five states, including 15 in Connecticut.  Termini agreed to forfeit $500,000.  So he steals millions but he "agreed" to pay a measly half a million. 

"Mr. Termini admitted he made some errors," Keefe said. "Otherwise he did a lot of good for a lot of people in that industry."

 

 

Arrests in chemical restraint death cases

ABC News reported a story about the deaths of residents caused by over medication and chemical restraint.  When residents at the Kern Valley Nursing Home complained or annoyed nursing director Gwen Hughes, prosecutors say she chemically restrained them with powerful anti-psychotic drugs. Her methods were so severe, three residents died.

California Attorney General Jerry Brown says that Hughes ordered one patient drugged just for glaring at her, and another for throwing a carton of milk. Some residents were left drooling, dehydrated, and dangerously thin.  According to Brown, "In a couple cases, elderly people were actually held down, restrained against their will, and given excessive amounts of medicine to keep them quiet."

Even more shocking -- Hughes had been fired for over-drugging once before, from a nursing home in nearby Fresno, Calif. The administrator of that nursing home said they told her next employer only the dates she worked there.

Three nursing home officials appeared at a hearing on charges of elder abuse at the Kern Valley facility from 2003 to 2007 -- Gwen Hughes, as well as administrator Pamela Ott and staff physician, Dr. Hoshang Pormir. The three defendants each face up to 11 years in prison, and all have pleaded not guilty. A preliminary hearing is set for March 9, 2010.

Additionally, a former pharmacist at the facility, Debbi Gayle Hayes, accepted a plea bargain on the condition that she testifies for the prosecution.

Experts say over-drugging is common nationwide, and the number of nursing home residents who are given these drugs is rising.   It has been estimated that nursing homes give anti-psychotics to one in every four patients. Some suggest that the drugs are replacing physical restraints, which are now illegal except as a last resort.

Toby Edelman, from the watchdog Center for Medicare Advocacy, says, "They're hiding the restraints. A physical restraint is visible, but a chemical restraint is not."

Using a chemical purely as a restraint is also illegal, but they are so widely used that the lawyer for Pormir, the doctor in the California case, plans to cite the drugs' widespread use as part of his defense.

His attorney, Dennis Thelen, says, "To suggest that using psychotropic medication is contrary to a patient's best interest is just flatly contradicted by what happens every day in the United States, yesterday, right now, and tomorrow."

A Food and Drug Administration official estimates that unnecessary anti-psychotics kill 15,000 nursing home patients each year, including Fannie Mae Brinkley.

There are steps you can take to make sure your loved one isn't at risk. Click the links below for more information.

Elder Justice Coalition http://www.elderjusticecoalition.gov

National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse http://www.preventelderabuse.org

National Adult Protective Services Association http://www.apsnetwork.org/

National Center on Elder Abuse http://www.ncea.aoa.gov

National Association of State Units on Aging www.nasua.org

National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys www.naela.org

National Association of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs http://www.nasop.org/

Nursing Home Comparison Tool from Medicare http://www.medicare.gov/NHCompare

Center for Medicare Advocacy www.medicareadvocacy.org

Directory of State Resources from the National Center on Elder Abuse http://www.ncea.aoa.gov/NCEAroot/Main_Site/Find_Help/State_Resources.aspx

 

Disparate treatment based on race/ethnicity?

I saw this press release from Brown University.  Interesting conclusions based on data.

Hispanic senior citizens are living in nursing homes in ever-increasing numbers, but they face a gap in their quality of care compared to white residents, according to new research from Brown University. 

A team led by Mary Fennell, professor of sociology and community health, found that Hispanic elderly are more likely than whites to live in nursing homes of poor quality. These residences are often faced with structural problems, staffing issues and financial trouble.

Details will be featured in the January 2010 edition of Health Affairs. The research follows up and expands upon a landmark 2007 study, also published in Health Affairs, suggesting that blacks are more likely than whites to live in poor-quality nursing homes. Vincent Mor, chair of the Department of Community Health, was a lead author in that study and is a co-author in the new work looking at nursing home care for Hispanics. Temple University was also a partner in the previous research.

Fennell said the paper is the first full-scale analysis of its kind to attempt to look broadly at Hispanics in nursing homes — what kind of nursing homes they live in and how care at those facilities compares to nursing homes which care mostly for white elderly people. She said the data revealed a sharp disparity in care.

"The most shocking finding is the pervasiveness of disparities in nursing home care that are primarily white, compared to nursing homes that are a mix of whites and Hispanic residences," Fennell said.

Fennell said the findings, in part, reflect a departure from prior patterns of elder care among Hispanic families in the United States. Traditionally, the group has used formal long-term care services less frequently than any other U.S. ethnic group. They had also been less likely than white or black residents to live in nursing homes. In Hispanic households, elder care has traditionally been handled by adult daughters at home, but acculturation and financial issues have forced a growing number of young Hispanic women into work outside the home.

As a result, Fennell said, the loss of home caregivers is occurring even as the growth of the elderly Hispanic population rises dramatically. The authors estimate that more than 5 percent of the current Hispanic population is elderly, a number that is expected to quadruple during the next 10 years. That number should rise to 4.5 million by 2010, according to Fennell and her team.

Fennell and her colleagues found that the overall use of nursing homes has declined since 1985, but the racial/ethnic mix of the national population of nursing home residents has shifted. From 2000 to 2005 — the period of data used in the study — the percent of Hispanic residents increased from 5 percent to 6.4 percent, but the percentage of non-Hispanic white residents dipped from just under 83 percent to 79.4 percent.

Nursing home residents are coming increasingly from the lower end of the socio-economic scale, Fennell said, lacking resources for better quality care in assisted living facilities or elsewhere.

Fennell argues that the impact of substandard nursing home care is a complex issue. Residents admitted to nursing homes have often already endured hospitalizations or a health issue that required expensive, high-level care. Once admitted, the individual is then often caught in a spiral of long-term lower quality of life, multiple episodes of poor health and ongoing chronic conditions without a way out.

"People with resources can get into very good places or alternatives for nursing home care," Fennell said. "Everyone else is left with not-very-good facilities that are not performing well."

Fennell is hoping that both federal and state policy-makers pay attention to the data as they shape health care reform policy.


 

 

 

Continue Reading...

Lack of end of life programs in nursing homes

McKnight's had an article about end of life programs in nursing homes.  Fewer than one in five nursing homes provide end-of-life care services, according to new research from the American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging.   However, any expansion would have to deal with the "death panel" demagoguery.  These programs are necessary to assist residents and their families regarding their rights to end of life decisions.

As many as 25% of all deaths occur in the U.S. occur in a nursing home, according to the report from AAHSA's Institute for the Future of Aging Services.  Despite this, less than 20% of nursing homes offer end-of-life programs. Nursing homes were more likely to participate in end-of-life programs if they also offered specialty programs for hospice, pain management or dementia care, according to the report.  

There is also a link between staff training in end-of-life care services and a facility's participation in end-of life-programs, the report showed. Providing appropriate staff training may be the key to expanding program participation, according to Helaine Resnick, director of research at IFAS. The research was published in the online version of the American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care Medicine.
 

Poliakoff & Associates, P.A., is one of South Carolina’s most respected and distinguished law firms. The Poliakoff firm began nearlyMore...