Medicare Certification Lost

The Knoxville News reported Maryland's Colonial Hills Nursing Center will likely lose its status as a Medicare service provider and take only private-pay patients for at least the next six months effective Jan. 7.  CMS has determined that the nursing home "is not in compliance" with its regulations.   More than six months ago, Colonial Hills was added to a national list of "special focus" facilities in danger of losing certification, and as of October, the list said, conditions at Colonial Hills had not improved enough for it to be removed from the list.  Medicare will not pay for the care of any residents admitted after Jan. 7 and will pay only for 30 days' care, through Feb. 6, for residents admitted before Jan. 7.

Beecher Hunter is president of Cleveland, Tenn.-based Life Care Centers of America, which manages Colonial Hills and more than 100 other nursing homes. Hunter blames previous administrator, Rick Sharp, who was "dismissed". Director of Nursing Donia Amburn is serving as interim administrator while Life Care looks for the "best person" to fill the position full time. 

So they blame everything on the Administrator--I would like to hear his side of the story.

 

Poor Quality of Care at For Profit Chains

The University of Alabama at Birmingham is currently studying the relationship between the sale, purchase, and operation of nursing homes by private firms and the quality of care provided by those facilities. The study will compare quality and financial performance data of both private and public nursing homes. The study will show a decreased quality of care in the facilities owned by private firms.

 

Low Staffing and Poor Quality of Care at Nation's For-Profit Nursing Homes

UCSF ran an article on the recent study that proved the nation’s largest for-profit nursing homes deliver significantly lower quality of care because they typically have fewer staff nurses than non-profit and government-owned nursing homes. It is the first-ever study focusing solely on staffing and quality at the 10 largest for-profit chains.  The 10 largest for-profit chains operate about 2,000 nursing homes in the United States, controlling approximately 13 percent of the country’s nursing home beds.

Poor quality of care is endemic in many nursing homes, but we found that the most serious problems occur in the largest for-profit chains,” said first author Charlene Harrington, RN, PhD, professor emeritus of sociology and nursing at the UCSF School of Nursing. Harrington also is director of the UCSF National Center for Personal Assistance Services“The top 10 chains have a strategy of keeping labor costs low to increase profits,” Harrington said. “They are not making quality a priority.”

Low nurse staffing levels are considered the strongest predictor of poor nursing home quality.  The researchers compared staffing levels and facility deficiencies at the for-profit chains to those at homes run by five other ownership groups to measure quality of care. The 10 largest chains were selected because they are influential in the nursing home industry and are the most successful in terms of growth and market share.  The study found that for-profit homes strive to keep their costs down by reducing staffing, particularly RN staffing.

The 10 largest for-profit chains in 2008 were HCR Manor Care, Golden Living, Life Care Centers of America, Kindred Healthcare, Genesis HealthCare Corporation, Sun Health Care Group, Inc., SavaSeniorCare LLC, Extendicare Health Services, Inc., National Health Care Corporation, and Skilled HealthCare, LLC.

From 2003 to 2008, these chains had fewer nurse “staffing hours” than non-profit and government nursing homes when controlling for other factors. Together, these companies had the sickest residents, but their total nursing hours were 30 percent lower than non-profit and government nursing homes. Moreover, the top chains were well below the national average for RN and total nurse staffing, and below the minimum nurse staffing recommended by experts.

The 10 largest for-profit chains were cited for 36 percent more deficiencies and 41 percent more serious deficiencies than the best facilities. Deficiencies include failure to prevent pressure sores, resident weight loss, falls, infections, resident mistreatment, poor sanitary conditions, and other problems that could seriously harm residents.

The study also found that the four largest for-profit nursing home chains purchased by private equity companies between 2003 and 2008 had more deficiencies after being acquired. The study is the first to make the connection between worse care following acquisition by private equity companies.

UCSF is a leading university dedicated to promoting health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care.

 

OIG Report on Use of Antipsychotics

Medpage Today reported that companies that administer Medicare Part D drug programs for seniors cannot tell whether antipsychotics and other drugs they cover are being used for medically accepted indications, according to a new report from the Department of Health and Human Services's Office of the Inspector General (OIG). The investigation and report were a result of substantial concerns that nursing home residents are being over-prescribed atypical antipsychotics.

An OIG report earlier this year found that 14% of all nursing home residents with Medicare had claims for antipsychotics, and 88% of the atypical antipsychotics prescribed off-label were for dementia. More than half of all elderly nursing home residents' Medicare claims for antipsychotics were made erroneously, the OIG found.

There are eight atypical antipsychotics approved by the FDA to treat schizophrenia and/or bipolar disorder, including clozapine (Clozaril), aripiprazole (Abilify), and quetiapine (Seroquel). None of them are approved to treat dementia and must carry black box warnings that elderly people who take atypical antipsychotics have an increased risk of death, compared with those who take placebo pills for dementia.

The report found that nursing homes were being reimbursed without documentation whether a drug was used for a medically accepted indication.

Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) asked witnesses at the hearing about the new report -- all of whom were government officials or aging and nursing home experts -- why antipsychotics are being so widely used to control behavior in nursing homes.

One witness, Toby Edelman, an attorney with the Center for Medicare Advocacy, pointed to understaffed nursing homes; high turnover of nursing home staff who don't have time to get to know each patient; and to off-label marketing by drug companies who illegally promote the use of antipsychotics to doctors as a treatment for their elderly patients. Edelman also pointed to a decline in the use of physical restraints in nursing homes as a reason antipsychotic use in nursing homes has increased.

Dr. Jonathan Evans pointed to another more pervasive problem leading to overuse of the drugs among the elderly: The belief among doctors that medication is the first-line therapy for treating elderly adults with behavioral issues.

"There is a firm, fixed belief among many healthcare professionals that difficult or disruptive behaviors are causes for medication and that medication is likely be beneficial for that purpose," said Evans, who is the vice president of the American Medical Directors Association. "That belief is wrong."


 


 

Overuse of Medications in Nursing Homes

In the United States, nursing home residents with dementia are too often prescribed anti-psychotic drugs to calm their disruptive behavior, a costly and risky practice that should end, according to experts. Care should be taken to determine why the resident’s agitation or behavioral issues have increased and treat those underlying causes.

Daniel Levinson, Health and Human Services Inspector General, said recent government audits have raised concerns about the use of antipsychotics by elderly people with dementia in nursing homes, raising their risk of death and wasting money for the US healthcare system.

For instance, more than half of such prescriptions were wrongly paid for in 2007 by government Medicare because the patients did not exhibit symptoms of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, amounting to about 230 million dollars in waste. One audit showed 14 percent of nursing home residents had Medicare claims for antipsychotic drugs. However, nursing facilities' self-reported data indicate that in the third quarter of 2010, 26.2 percent of residents had received antipsychotic drugs in the previous seven days. Facilities reported they gave antipsychotic drugs to many residents who did not have a psychosis, including 40 percent of patients at high risk because of behavior issues.

The practice persists, even though it is against federal law, because of serious understaffing in nursing facilities, high turnover of staff, and aggressive off-label marketing of anti-psychotic drugs
.
Residents are often given these potent drugs for behaviors that have other causes such as urinary tract infections, pressure ulcers, tooth decay, arthritic pain, or simply moving a patient from one place to another can lead to agitated behaviors.

These drugs are used as chemical restraints," said Jonathan Evans, a doctor who specializes in caring for frail elders. "Behavior is not a disease. Behavior is communication. And in people who have lost the ability to communicate with words, the only way to communicate is through behavior," he added. “Good care demands we figure out what they are telling us and help them."

See article at New York Daily News.

Are Americans Overmedicated?

The medicating of Americans for mental illnesses continued to grow over the past decade, with one in five adults now taking at least one psychiatric drug such as antidepressants, antipsychotics and anti-anxiety medications, according to an analysis of pharmacy-claims data. WSJ's Shirley Wang reports the use of psychiatric medications among adults and children in the U.S. has risen substantially since 2000.  Among the most striking findings was a big increase in the use of powerful antipsychotic drugs across all ages, as well as growth in adult use of drugs for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder—a condition typically diagnosed in childhood.

Psychiatric medications are among the most widely prescribed and biggest-selling class of drugs in the U.S. In 2010, Americans spent $16.1 billion on antipsychotics to treat depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, $11.6 billion on antidepressants and $7.2 billion on treatment for ADHD, according to IMS Health, which tracks prescription-drug sales.

Use of antipsychotics such as J&J's Risperdal and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.'s Abilify grew substantially in the past decade in both kids and adults. The rise, despite increased awareness about potential side effects like weight gain, high cholesterol and diabetes, is worrisome, according to Mark Olfson, a professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University who studies psychiatric drug utilization patterns

Sexual Abuse

West Virginia's WSAZ reported the sentencing of Darren Canada, a nursing home employee, to only one to three years in jail. In December, Canada pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of attempting to commit a felony.  Canada was indicted on charges of abuse or neglect of incapacitated adult and second degree sexual abuse in September 2010.  The charges were the result of an incident involving an 81-year-old female patient at the Chateau Adult Care Facility.

The criminal compliant says that another employee at the facility caught Canada attempting to sexually assault the incapacitated patient.  When confronted, the complaint says Canada exited the building by jumping through a window.  Canada later confessed to the incident  

And he only has to serve a year?  Where is the justice?

The Importance of Communication

Kaiser Health News had an interesting article on how the failure to communicate can have dire consequences in the health care setting.  Medical tests reveal critical information about a person's health, and must be communicated to clinicians and patients.  Sometimes, the ball gets dropped somewhere between the lab or the radiology department and the clinician who ordered the test and the patient.

The article uses Peggy Kidwell's case as a typical example.  A mix-up over doctors' names led to a year-long delay in a breast cancer diagnosis.  After her annual gynecological exam and mammogram several years ago, she got a letter from her doctor saying the results of her Pap test were normal. Her doctor did not mention anything about her mammogram exam. A year later, when Kidwell went back for her annual exam, her doctor, finding no mammogram results in her chart, asked why she hadn't gotten a screening exam the previous year. When Kidwell said she had, the doctor investigated. Five hours later, the doctor called Kidwell to tell her she had found the results and it looked as though she had breast cancer.  The test results had been sent to an orthopedic surgeon at the medical center who had the same last name as Kidwell's gynecologist. The folder had been sitting on his desk for a year, according to her gynecologist.  By that time her cancer had spread to her chest wall. Kidwell had a lumpectomy, chemotherapy and radiation. The following year, the cancer came back and Kidwell had a mastectomy. She filed a lawsuit and eventually settled the case. 

A recent study in the Journal of the American College of Radiology found that annual medical malpractice payouts for communication breakdowns, including failing to share test results, more than quadrupled nationally between 1991 and 2010, to $91 million. For patients, the missteps and mistakes can be life-altering. Patient follow-up could make a difference in many instances. The study examined medical malpractice claims from 425 hospitals and 52,000 providers.

Of the 306 cases in which test results were specifically cited as a factor in a malpractice case, the most common problem — it occurred almost half the time — was that the patient didn't receive the test results, cited in 143 cases. The second-most-common problem was that the clinician didn't receive the results, cited in 110 cases. Other problems included delays and slow turnaround in reporting findings and test results that were filed before the clinician reviewed them.

 

What Nursing Shortage?

The nursing home industry has complained for years that understaffing was caused by the lack of available nurses.  It is a myth.  That's the upshot of a study in the policy journal Health Affairs. The authors, economists from RAND Health and Dartmouth College and a nursing professor from Vanderbilt University, found a significant upswing in the number of young women (aged 23-26) choosing nursing as a career between 2002 and 2009.  Funding for nurse training programs tripled between 2001 and 2010, from $80 million per year to $240 million.

It will be the largest cohort of registered nurses ever observed.  In fact, the 62 percent increase means that the ranks of registered nurses are expected to grow at roughly the same rate as the population between now and 2030. One reason cited by the researchers are accelerated degree programs designed to appeal to people who already have degrees in other fields. These programs can get nurses trained and ready to practice in as little as a year in some cases.

In 2010, according to the study, 55,000 qualified applicants were turned away — up from 16,000 in 2003.


 

Corporate neglect

The West Virginia Gazette had an article about the history of poor care provided at Heartland of Charleston in West Virginia.  Federal authorities revoked its' Medicare and Medicaid funding in September after inspectors cited the home for several serious violations after the corporate owner/operator failed to fix the deficiencies that state inspectors found in June.

"The violations listed in the initial 156-page inspection report ranged from administrators failing to keep notifications of procedures and nurse availability posted to more serious cases where one patient bled profusely from a pressure sore after nurse's aides failed to check whether a blood-clotting test had been performed.  A supplemental report lists several instances where the home's administrators failed to properly investigate allegations of staffers abusing patients, including one case where a patient had accused two nurse's aides of beating him in a shower room."

Other deficiencies listed in the inspection report included:

A resident, labeled as a fall risk, was found face down on the floor six hours after she was admitted.  Nurse's aides had placed a fall mat on one side of the woman's bed.

One resident had an unnecessary catheter for more than two months, while two more residents were not given proper treatment after doctors had declared them incontinent. The inspector found that one of those residents had been sleeping on a bed with a large wet ring stretching across the bottom sheet. 

Some residents were taking medications they did not need. According to the report, nurses continued to give one resident "sliding scale" insulin doses despite a pharmacist's recommendation to stop. The pharmacist noted that the resident's blood sugars were in "excellent control, " and detailed the facility's need to closely monitor the resident's future insulin intake. Staff had not checked the resident's hemoglobin levels in months, according to the report.

Nurses found one resident on the floor at least five times in two months. In January, the elderly patient fell twice in a span of about 12 hours. Staff labeled some of the falls as "attention-seeking behaviors," according to the inspector's notes.

Inspectors found that the home's medications were not properly labeled.

One resident lost seven pounds in three days because staff had failed to provide dietary supplements a doctor had prescribed.

A resident with a right hand muscle contracture (a permanent shortening of a muscle or joint) was not fitted with a device designed to help minimize the loss of range of motion. The resident's care plan noted a need for the device in February -- four months before the June inspection.

Nursing staff took 10 to 20 minutes to answer several residents' call lights.

One nurse's aide was fired after intentionally unplugging a resident's call light.  Administrators did not report the incident to Adult Protective Services.

A resident known as No. 228 was neglected.  The inspector could see dried blood on a cut above the 76-year-old woman's left eye, which was still swollen and bruised from a fall she had while trying to pick up a bag of birdseed at about 2:30 that morning.  The woman's nursing notes revealed that she was admitted to the facility at 8:30 p.m. the previous evening. A doctor wrote on her admission form that she suffered from dementia and had a history of falling.

The fall earned her a trip to the emergency room, where doctors assessed, cleaned and repaired her head wound, according to the inspection report. She was back in her bed at Heartland by 6:30 a.m. with a doctor's instructions for follow-up care.

Since 2006, federal authorities revoked Heartland's Medicare and Medicaid funding three times and have fined the home a total of $232,375.  Toledo Ohio-based HCR Manor Care, Heartland's overarching corporate owner, operates hundreds of nursing homes across the country and lists assets of more than $8 billion. The company, which itself falls under the ownership of equity giant Carlysle Group, has attracted criticism for reportedly hiring too few staff at low pay in order to maximize earnings.

 

 

Click here for older posts
Poliakoff & Associates, P.A., is one of South Carolina’s most respected and distinguished law firms. The Poliakoff firm began nearly 60 years ago by three attorney brothers: Matthew, J. Manning, and Bernard. With a history of believing the justice system...More...